User talk:Tide rolls/Archive 1

Welcome
I wont template you, because you seem to be well versed in how the plumbing works here. I've replied over at User talk:Jayvdb. If you have any queries about Wikipedia, Wikisource, or any wiki you can find for that matter, I'll be happy to try and assist. John Vandenberg (chat) 16:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

re
no its fine  Here  Ford 17:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Not drowning, just waving
Per Three-revert rule, there are exceptions to the rule, one of which is "Reverting obvious vandalism". Which is what you were doing - I've checked your edits. Do please continue to do the same, so long as the vandalism, as in this case, is obvious. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Having looked more, a couple of observations. First, you did not break 3RR because you only reverted twice. However each revert took you two edits, which makes me think you are trying to revert the vandalism by hand editing, rather than by selecting the last good version of the article (from the history list), putting it into edit mode and then saving it. If so, then I advise that the latter method - reverting to the last good version, is probably a better way to go since the by hand method risks overlooking remaining problems. Here's a revert I;ve done on the article using that technique - you can see the very large number of outstanding issues which your technique did not pick up.
 * But kudos to you for the work you have done, and for asking for input on the possible 3RR. Both are commendable, please carry on. Camille Paglia in particular seems to attract vandals, a couple of whom are almost certainly sock-puppets. Putting her article on your watchlist should provide you with no end of things to do. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * No probs. Nice to have you around. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
D'oh. Yeah, must have buttonmashed accidentally. Sorry about that. – PranksterTurtle (talk) 12:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton Talk · Review  15:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Good luck and well done! Also, thanks for your comment at PranksterTurtle talkpage. just in case you don't know, you can go here: Huggle/Download to download huggle, just follow the instructions. Thanks SpitfireTally-ho! 17:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Huggle
Please watch your Huggles, such as with this edit. Rollback is to be used for vandalism and not good faith edits. Q T C 22:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome (again)
Hope you don't mind a greeting from an Auburn denizen. Always pleased to see another editor from 'Bama. Welcome aboard. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 19:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page. Much appreciated. DanielDeibler (talk) 02:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I see you've the same for me. I appreciate that, too.  Tide  rolls  03:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Hello, nice to see you again, just dropping by to say thanks for the reversion of vandalism on my user-page, cheers SpitfireTally-ho! 05:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You're quite welcome. I'm sure you will have ample opportunity to return the favor.  They've hit me hard this evening.  I'm so proud :)  Tide  rolls  05:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Griffinofwales (talk) 18:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Please Disag
Please disag Skynet in the GhostNet article since you were so quick to revert my unlinking. You must know what it is supposed to link to Two Halves, not logged in... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.182.237 (talk) 20:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Trojan Horse
I am well aware that my edit was vandalism. I am not here to edit constructively. In fact, I am going to abuse multiple accounts from this address. 91.108.220.240 (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

WHY?
why did you take my barnstar away from a more perfect onion. WHY?. I really mean it. It was for that thing "e" did.--Spongefrog 21:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

If there was a good reason just ignore the above--Spongefrog (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you--Spongefrog (talk) 06:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I prefer the Spivak pronoun "e". --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

hello there, what's up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.88.167.155 (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting my talk page and the article me. =) That editor won't be back for a little while. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Re your message: Reverting blatant personal attacks on user talk pages is well within policy. I've seen you around the RC patrol and you have beaten me to quite a few reverts lately, so you're doing fine. =)  One thing I would recommend is that you issue a few more warnings to editors, especially if they are doing blatant vandalism.  When an editor is issued the requisite number of warnings, they can be blocked by an admin.  When you skip over a warning, the vandal might be given the opportunity to vandalize longer since an admin will not usually block until the third or fourth warning is issued. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again. =) Sockpuppet didn't like that I semi-protected his two favorite targets. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

...
What edit are you referring to and what exactly was wrong with it?

Vandalism yourself
Do not censor facts that you do not like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirilovski (talk • contribs) 18:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What are you referring to?  Tide  rolls  18:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Your censorship on Igor Kurchatov. Wikipedia has to report the truth, not some glossy brochure on famous people. I am sick and tired of the homophobia in Russia, why can people not accept that gays can be famous and successfull. Kirilovski (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I checked the article and saw I had reverted the entry of the word "gay" into the article. I don't care if the man is/was gay.  Homosexual references are a common vandalism tactic.  If you want to insert a reliably sourced fact into an article, please...go ahead.  Without a verifiable source your edit may be reverted again.  If my reversion was in error, I apologize.  Tide  rolls  18:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, but I added a short paragraph and a source in the same edit. You probably did not see that. Seems ok now, maybe this fact is not essential for his career and shouldnt be in the lead, the paragraph at the end discussing his personal life is then enough. Kirilovski (talk) 19:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your patience. If you discuss this edit with editor on the article talk page, I'm sure that they will be able to help crafting the edit.  Good luck.  Tide  rolls  19:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Sheffield
hai guy, have you ever been to sheffield? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.83.75 (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Nope.  Tide  rolls  19:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * LOL. Thanks.  Tide  rolls  19:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for this.  Wacko Jack O   14:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Keep Up The Good Work

 * As far as i can see 12345678910 You are Doing great :-) Maen. K. A. (talk) 17:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Unjustified attacks on armless gimps throughout history
Your recent vandalism of the Thayer and Schindler articles will not stand. I have contacted my attorney, Herr Ludwig Armless-Gimp Wittgenstein, and he will see to your ousting from Wikipedia!

Good day, sir! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.239.19 (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please provide a diff for your sources on this info. I hate making mistakes and would want to revert my edits as soon as I can see the sources.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  17:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't feel bad. I'll provide the sources shortly. Thayer's Life is the source for the claim about Schindler and the notes of Elliot Forbes provide the source for Thayer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.239.19 (talk) 17:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If I could make a suggestion; it might be better to take the sources to the editors on the talk pages of the respective articles and open a discussion on adding your edits. Getting a concensus there would help you address the concern of encyclopedic style.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  17:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

How can I help?
Noticed you were reverting a lot of vandalism on Twitter. How can I get more involved reverting vandalism? --Kevphenry (talk) 04:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * This would be a good place to start: Cleaning up vandalism. Let me know if you have any more question.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  04:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanking with white keys
Thank you for all you have done. Do you know if there will be IDO coupons? Linguistixuck (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

My user page
Thanks for reverting the vandalism. Leave  Sleaves  14:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Lol, the IP who reverted my edits is a friend of mine who is a diehard Tatu fan. I was just screwing with her, and I apologize to you and Wikipedia for doing such. 24.226.32.183 (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Huggle Lite?
Did you ever get Huggle Lite working? DanielDeibler (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I finally got the main version to work after getting some help from the HG Feedback page. So, I haven't tried the Lite version.  Have you?  Tide  rolls  21:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Issue with 71.112.197.95
Turns out 71.112.197.95 was simply looking for the phone number to the station. Also, nice work with WP:HG. Judicatus | Talk | Contributions 21:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I tried to help by putting a link on their talk page. I wonder if Yellowbook.com is down? LOL  Well, enough comedy...back to work.  Thanks for the compliment, too.  Tide  rolls  21:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Lol Jimbo clogged the tubez to yb.com, it's information is invalid you know! Happy editing ;-) Judicatus | Talk | Contributions 21:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Drama Judicatus | Talk | Contributions 22:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Never boring. :-\  Tide  rolls  22:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Not sure if it was intentional or not, but you revered this edit,, then you reverted your own edit. I rv'd to the last edit by me. Just though I'd let you know. Thanks, Ono (talk) 22:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

IP edit
Thank you for your assistance, Mr. Rolls! Keep fighting the good fight!128.6.175.20 (talk) 22:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Thanks
Of course, I did not think you would agree with that kind of template edit Lol. Judicatus | Talk | Contributions 22:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

1 Beat me to it! Judicatus | Talk | Contributions 22:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Recent edit to the page Polygamy
This is regarding your message at User talk:75.72.217.46 regarding this edit to the page Polygamy. I am obviously new to editing and while reading the article came across a typo so thought of fixing that. I did not give a detailed description as the fix was self evident but after getting a message from you I re-edited and this time I gave a detailed edit description. But now I notice that the page has been reverted and I am given a warning. I would appreciate if you could could look into the page and see for yourself that I was just trying to fix an error. Cheers :) Umnmathtutor (talk) 03:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Thanks
No problem - just happy to help! - Fastily (talk) 06:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Systems analysis
Hi. You're up to the max number of daily reverts on Systems analysis. Let me do it next time. And I'll have him blocked? Regards, Piano non troppo 14:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Thackerville, Oklahoma
Hi! I noticed that you reverted a vandalized version of that page to another vandalized version. I've done it myself. Just try to be a bit more careful. (Side note:User:Magog the Ogre beat me to fixing it) Thanks,  Genius 101 Guestbook  18:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It's no problem: as I said we've all done it. Thanks,  Genius 101 Guestbook  18:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting vandalism to my userpage. Cheers, JNW (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Uncivil
But it is the truth and I can cite references - Our Glorious Leader..Duckdad (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Duckdad

How is it vandalism?
In almost every episode of Family Guy, Peter's fat does block view of his Penis. It's a very common repeating gag in Family Guy. Loosechang (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Put it back in. I won't revert again.  Tide  rolls  20:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. But another editor removed it.  -sigh- I don't understand whats so bad about that, especially in a Family Guy article.  This is ridiculous. Loosechang (talk) 21:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It isn't a question of bad. Or being true. Have you engaged with the editors on the talk page of the article?  Perhaps they will be able to aid you in your editing.  Plus you can go here: List of policies and learn more as well.  Good luck.  Tide  rolls  21:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry I misunderstood your statement. Thank you, that link seems helpful. Loosechang (talk) 21:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Jbollong
The user had created a page and then blanked it, so the blanking wasn't vandalism. It is better to use the series of templates such as uw-delete1 instead of the usual vandal warning templates when content is removed without explanation, as sometimes there is a valid reason. — Snigbrook 21:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I've never used Huggle so I don't know what options are available, if it usually gives a "one author" warning maybe it didn't on this occasion as another user had added a notability template to the article (which may have been the reason for the blanking). I agree that blanking without explanation appears to be unconstructive, and is often vandalism, but new and unregistered users don't always use an edit summary (I've often noticed this with edits by the author or subject of the article), and sometimes don't know about the edit summary box (I've occasionally seen comments placed in the article instead). — Snigbrook  11:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Message on talk page...
...did you really put this message on anyone's talk page? nneonneo talk 02:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I just thought this user might be reposting something you wrote. Assuming "CU" meant "Checkuser", I wonder what you would need one for? Anyway, I reverted the edit -- I figure he shouldn't be impersonating messages from an established user, as that could lead to confusion. nneonneo talk 03:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * User talk:129.97.134.14, User talk:129.97.134.36 and User talk:129.97.134.80 are all assigned to the University of Waterloo Computer Science Club, and I personally know a few of them who like causing trouble on Wikipedia. Also, as for the message, it's not their welcome message (their welcome message consisted of several templated warning messages, culminating in a level-4 warning) -- my guess is this user wrote it himself, though for what reason I can't possibly imagine :) Thanks for your speedy work reverting these guys, though. nneonneo talk 04:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Just a quick note..
About this revert The IPs edit was not really vandalism... just VERY poorly worded text that should have been incorporated into the article properly rather than blanking the existing text to add the newer content. Angus Young does in fact use an amplifier built by Wizard Amplification based in Cornwall Ontario. Just so you know in case you want to rm the vandalism warning and replace it with something more appropriate. The Real Libs-speak politely 19:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Your warning at User talk:209.212.47.11
I replaced it by v4im. This IP has only been used for vandalism, these were the first edits after the lift of the previous block. If this is a problem, feel free to revert me.LeadSongDog come howl 16:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I was relying on the automated warning so no problem whatsoever. I appreciate the heads up.  See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  16:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for dealing with that vandalism on my userpage. Was I on your watchlist or something. You found it quite fast. Ill get a barnstar in a minute.--Spongefrog (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Bologna sausage
I'm guessing this edit to Bologna sausage was in error. --Salix (talk): 23:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!
Hey Tide rolls. Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism on my user page. Happy editing to you and your kin.  Flying Toaster  13:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

i don't understand why my edit to the Rio Rancho High School page keeps getting deleted. Who cares if it isn't constructive? ITS THE TRUTH!! PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfawver (talk • contribs) 18:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem
Hey, no problem.

Just helping a fellow anti-vandal! Keep up the good work! -- Riotrocket8676  You gotta problem with that? 21:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Re. vandalism
Note - you may want to consider archiving your talk page in the near future =p. Ayrton Prost sign 12:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Why would u block me?
Why would you block me--Fuzzmunky82 (talk) 04:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I cannot block you. Only an administrator can block you.  Section blanking like this:, and this:  appear to be vandalism.  These edit may not be vandalism.  I notice you have made no contributions to the talk pages at the articles you have edited.  You may find it helpful to engage the other editors at those talk pages to help you with your edits.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  04:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

You dont know how fucking important I am do you? --Fuzzmunky82 (talk) 04:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I tried. That's all I can do.  Please do not post here.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  04:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm confused
Please check these edits: ,

I don't understand why this ===Hi I'm ROxBO and I'm a bender!=== was not reverted and I do not know how to revert it. Thanks for any assistance.  Tide  rolls  14:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm? You reverted it in the second link you gave. Doesn't seem to be a problem. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what it looks like to me too. Thanks,  Genius 101 Guestbook  14:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. My cache must not be purged 'cause it still shows in the article for me.  Please excuse my panic.  Coffee must've been too strong:o\ Thanks for the quick response as well.  Tide  rolls  15:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Userpage protection
I requested that your userpage be protected since anon IP's keep vandalising your page. See here at RFPP. Keep up the good work dealing with vandals. Momusufan (talk) 03:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Userpage protection
Alright, I've semi-protected it for one week, since that seems to be the most effective option. Regards, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

user page
Thanks for the clean up yesterday on my user page! happy editing Ottawa4ever (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hey, thanks for the rollback on my talk page. I appriciate it! Icestorm815 •  Talk  20:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for cleaning up my user page. I haven't really been blocked, have I? What have I done that would get me blocked? WadeSimMiser (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

re. User talk:12.69.49.51
Hi, re. edits to my subpage by - please disregard; it's a test of an issue we're trying to resolve for a user with problems editing Wikipedia. I've asked the user (on IRC) to perform those edits, so pls disregard any further edits. If you're interested, join IRC #wikipedia-en-help quickie Java version. Cheers!  Chzz  ►  02:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. Thanks for watching my back tho - I do appreciate it :-)  Chzz  ►  02:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Boze
Ouch. I'm not sure what I've stepped into, but i certainly didn't mean to. I thought I was removing old, irrelevant stuff. I apologize if it is/was something important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sassy Sylvia (talk • contribs) 02:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Reversions
Please supply a custom edit summary when performing a reversion such as this one (the removal of an addition that was not vandalistic or otherwise patently inappropriate). Thank you! —David Levy 21:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I see the point you are making concerning vandalism vs improper or poorly constructed edits. I would like to say, not in defense of my revert but explanation, I noticed that Majorly had just reverted the same editor and the editor was was not adding to their own post.  It looked like graffiti to me.  Of course, one can never be too careful so I will endeavor to be more careful. Thanks for the heads up.  Tide  rolls  21:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for your thoughtful response! I also dropped Majorly a note, which was met with a substantially different reaction.
 * I agree that this type of edit to someone else's user page ordinarily would constitute graffiti, but Jimbo actively encourages other users to edit his user page (in that very section, in fact), so I would provide a custom summary for the reversion of anything not nonsensical or malicious.
 * Thanks again! —David Levy 21:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You're missing where it says that all edits should be made within our policies and guidelines - the edit clearly was not. Unlike Tide rolls, I'm an experienced rollbacker, and take issue with being spoken down to like a piece of dirt, as you did on my talk page. So perhaps consider why you received a different response. In any case, I don't see any issue with the way I replied to you.  Majorly  talk  21:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * 1. What policies or guidelines were violated? Ordinarily, it's inappropriate to edit someone else's words on his/her user page, but the text in question is the product of the collaborative editing (such as this, this, this and this) that Jimbo encourages; it wasn't writen by Jimbo alone.  And while I agree that Jspence80's edits didn't improve the prose, they made linguistic sense and didn't alter the meaning.
 * 2. I don't know why it seemed that I was speaking down to you like you were a piece of dirt, and I'm very sorry that you felt that way. —David Levy 22:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, Tide rolls. The edit was patently inappropriate, so rollback was perfectly acceptable. I don't know what David Levy is talking about.  Majorly  talk  21:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Why are you ignoring the fact that Jimbo encourages people to edit the page...in that exact section? —David Levy 21:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * He doesn't encourage inappropriate edits, which the edit clearly was. It does say that, in that exact section, if you'd care to read it.  Majorly  talk  21:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * What made the edits in question "inappropriate"? The only rationale that you've cited is the fact that they were performed to someone else's user page.
 * Keep in mind that I don't regard these edits as beneficial. I agree that it was appropriate to revert them, but I believe that custom summaries were warranted (because they appear to have been sincere attempts to improve the page, so this was a content dispute).
 * But as I noted on your talk page, I didn't mean to imply that this was a big deal. I wish that you were willing to accept well-meaning advice in the manner that Tide rolls did.  —David Levy 22:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry Tide rolls, I don't think you did anything wrong with that revert. Chillum  22:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Help please
Re: this edit. My first inclination was to undo the edit, leave a weloming message with a suggestion to contact editors on the talk page of the article. The edit is weirdly constructed, non-grammatical and appears to be heavily OR. I think it was posted in good faith, though. The editor obviously has put a lot of time into the edit and I would not like to antagonize or dissuade the editor from contributing further. Any advice would be helpful. Thanks.  Tide  rolls  12:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Howdy. Adminhelp not needed by the way, for this one a normal helpme would do.


 * I understand what you're saying, and yes, your plan of action seems OK, but, what would be even better would be if you fixed their edit a little, and used a diff to show them the problems, and how they could be fixed; if you can find a reliable source etc, then even better.
 * I note it's the ip's first contribution, so a nice gentle message would be good, and perhaps suggest they get an account so they can help us more.
 * If you want any further help, you could talk to us live.
 * Thanks for being considerate to the new user,
 * Best of luck,  Chzz  ►  12:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I was afraid that might be the answer. I'll take a look at copy editing the article even though I think it's way above my pay grade.  I won't take any drastic steps without being sure it's an improvement.  Sorry for ringing the panic button but I didn't know who might be online that could help.  Something's wrong with my Java version so IRC won't work at the moment.  Another item for my "to-do" list.  Thanks for the quick response.  Tide  rolls  12:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Highwaymen
Hello,

You gave the user a level one warning, so I changed it to a level 3 as he already has a level one and two. Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 14:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message. Good work, too.  Tide  rolls  14:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi tiderolls,For your info, This IP address 194.254.210.83 just vandalised your talk page just after you gave him a level 4 warning --Jamesooders (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

:D
No Probs :D --Jamesooders (talk) 15:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

86.167.217.244
You've given a fair few warnings to this user already about unconstructive edits. It appears that they are continuing and is repeatedly editing Foals to say that the band have broken up, despite the fact that this cannot be verified on the internet anywhere. I can foresee an edit war, so as an admin who has dealt with the person before I'd appreciate if you could review the situation. Cheers, --Nimoranthu (talk) 21:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Haha okay, sorry. I presumed you were an admin. Thanks for looking anyway. I haven't yet mastered the protocols on this sort of thing. Good luck. :) --Nimoranthu (talk) 00:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

re Advice requested
Good question. Just as for me, I generally don't refactor or modify any other user's comments unless it is something like a serious blatant personal attack (even then I'd usually rather report it) or an actual form of harassment or posting someone's personal info or something like that. Cirt (talk) 12:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Jackass
Thanks. Can't edit the page to add the shared ip tag unless someone creates my talk page for me, and the fastest way to do that is unfortunately to vandalize. Incidentally, you may want to look into archiving that talk page, it was 85 kbs when I blanked it. 129.108.228.193 (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
My usertalk page was vandalised recently, Thanks for cleaning that up.. --<em style="font-family:Impact"> Frankie 0607  19:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009 #2
In what way was my edit unconstructive? I replied to a notice left by another editor? --Drogonov (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Why did you remove Drogonov's comment from my user talk page? —mjb (talk) 20:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

re the above
Thanks for cleaning up my userpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Thx
Thanks for the revert,  Chzz  ►  23:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

You seem very popular
You seem to be very popular with the vandals/trolls on your userpage. Would you like me to semi-protect it for a week to give your busy social schedule a break from these uninvited guests? Chillum 00:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Weird ClueBotArciver edits to my (and others') talkpage
What the hey? Thanks for reverting that. Tonywalton Talk 18:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Unblock request by Yoda written was. Tonywalton Talk 20:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

:(
Unfortunately, Tide rolls, I have recently been forced to re-add you to the Shame List. A user with rollback rights should know better.--Please don&#39;t look at my real username. I hate it. (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you…
…that was quick :) -- Avi (talk) 04:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I've tagged him on the AIV page for blocking. Richard Harvey (talk) 18:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. I had seen that same user make very dubious edits just moments before, so I had some confidence you wouldn't mind me butting in.  Thanks for the positve feedback.  My compliments on your user page, BTW....good work.  Tide  rolls  18:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Nate Kelley article
Hi, it looks like the subject of this bio doesn't wish to have her info on display, so maybe we should wait for what she has to say before reverting her changes. I've asked for some more info on the help desk: Help_desk. Laurent (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up. I saw the edit summary, but I've seen that kind of thing before.  I'm in no hurry to revert what may be a legitimate situation. Good work on the recent changes, btw.  See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  16:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks and you're welcome. I'm glad you have no problem with me butting in. It wasn't a major bit of vandalism, but I didn't know when you might be back online to take care of it yourself. See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  17:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...
..for watching my User page. Regards, Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 04:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Always good to hear I haven't over reacted by messing with someone's page. I know you could've made the reversion, but I never know how often users log in.  You're welcome.  Tide  rolls  04:06, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks!
Thank you for helping out with the IP who was screwing around with my user page. I'm not sure what the grudge was, but I suspect it was some work I did on the Driscoll Catholic High School. Again, thanks for not only reverting the vandalism, but for following through to the block ... LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. If you read the posts above you see I'm reluctant to interfere with others' talk pages.  Thanks for letting me know you're ok with it.  Hopefully, your fan will get bored and find other forms of entertainment.  See ya 'round.  Tide  rolls  06:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Silverton, Colorado
Clearly you do not recognize a magnificent piece of research when you see it. The edits I made to the Silverton, Colorado page were all very accurate and well researched. I feel that your oppression of the truth is rather unwarranted, and leads me to question Wikipedia's site governance. I can only hope that this is not some internet conspiracy to hide the real world while you pull a Matrix on us.

I would appreciate it if you would allow me to keep the edits, as they were done in good taste and can prove to be very valuable as references in the near future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.10.184 (talk) 06:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * So, your definition of "well researched" is an apartment ratings comment from some anonymous person? Maybe you're right.  The best thing for you to do would be to take your information to the regular editors on that article and get some feedback from them.  I wish you well in your future editing and welcome to Wikipedia.  Tide  rolls  06:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Barn Stars
Hello again Tide rolls, long time no see, anyway, I noticed that you have a barn star section on your page now, at the moment if I hover over the barnstar the pop out box tells me the image name.

This code will make the pop out box say the barnstar name, just replace your current table with this if you want to:

Heres the difference:  and

Hover over them and you'll see what I mean, the first one is what I am suggesting the second is what you have at the moment. In anycase do not feel inclined to change it just because I suggested it, and if I'm not making sense, just ask. Finally: well done for all the barnstars, You definitely deserve each and every one SpitfireTally-ho! 08:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * A pleasure. Thanks a lot for the barn star, its hugely appreciated :). Your edits are as commendable as any that could be found on wikipedia so never feel that they aren't ;). All the best to you. SpitfireTally-ho! 22:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

David Cameron edit reverted
Sorry, I should not hve vandalised that wikipeda article and compromised the fab reputation of this famed web encyclopedia of fun. Also,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.105.61 (talk) 17:40, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Why did you remove my comment on the UTAS page mate? Ur an idiot. It was all fact. Do u just sit on the computer all day and send people warning emails? Dont you have anything better to do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.6.9 (talk) 07:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Black Ops article
Man, did you read the summary? Can you honestly say that an expression such as "cost eating" is encyclopedic enough? I mean, instead of mindlessly reverting an edit you could take the time to correct yourself what was wrong in the first place, if you don't like the solution that was offered. Seriously. Waiting for your reply, godspeed. 190.55.101.189 (talk) 07:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I read the summary. Fortunately, I also read your edit:  My revert was not intended to endorse the version of the article before you inserted your edit.  Nor was it "mindless"...a personal attack which only lessens the underpinings of my good faith.  The foundation of which was initally eroded by the fact that you had not contributed to the discussion of the article on its talk page.  No, I will not be visiting that article to offer any "solution".  Feel free to contact the regular editors of the article yourself and acquaint them with your ideas for improvement, though.  I'm sure you will be able to obtain the help and guidance sufficient to make your contribution to the article.  Good luck and welcome to Wikipedia.  Tide  rolls  16:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, buddy, calm down. I didn't mean to sound aggressive, didn't think you would take offense. I know we probably won't be able to become friends now but well, sorry anyways. So, in an hypothetical situation in which I would have made my edit to warn editors about a present issue but didn't really want to contribute with more than that (i.e. a pleasant correction), you think I should have just left it like that, neglecting the knowledge to the editors right? By your standards, that would have been bad/neutral faith if I'm not mistaken? Thanks for taking the time to read, kind regards 190.55.101.189 (talk) 19:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
For reverting the edit on my userpage.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Thanks for letting me know I didn't overstep.  Tide  rolls  17:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Women in Engineering
Thank you for your edits to the Women in Engineering page. The user whose edits you reverted has been persistently vandalizing the page over the past week. Please feel free to participate in the discussions on the mediation page. Tricia20 (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, of course, and I appreciate the kind invitation. Having active editors on an article is helpful in that I can get informed feedback on major edits like the one I reverted.  I will check out the mediation page even though I may not bring much to the table.  Tide  rolls  15:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Smashdakrap
Hello Tide rolls. As you do a lot of RC patrol you may come across this again. See WP:LTA. No need for warnings - straight to AIV and say "Runtshit". -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up.  Tide  rolls  18:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much
Hi I wanna say thank you to help me out and pull everything back. This person edit my links in non working links or delete it with no reason. But Thanks that you will help me out, I really didn't know how I must do that. I hope it will stop. Or if he don't please help, I don't know what to do, I contact Wikipedia already

Danielle aka Black Identity —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlackIdentity (talk • contribs) 18:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry too much about it. There are many people watching edits as they are being made so most are discovered quickly.  You may find it helpful to check on the articles you edit to make sure we haven't missed anything.  Don't let the people that change your edits affect how you feel about contributing.  They will get bored and go away after a short time.  Hang in there, Wikipedia needs all the good faith editors available.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  19:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

How can you report this user cause he delete and edit links over and over again... I'm really tired of this person —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlackIdentity (talk • contribs) 18:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * If it were me, I wouldn't consider reporting the editor that is undoing your contribution. The essence of the problem is a content dispute...content disputes must go through a process that doesn't actually include any kind of "report".  The first thing you want to try is contacting editors on the discussion page of the article.  I didn't see much activity there so that will probably not give you quick results.  Please try anyway.  It will help you in the long run to show that you are trying all available options.  If you do not get feedback within a day or two, go to WikiProject Biography/Members and try to contact editors there that can help you with your problem.  You may need to scan the list and determine which editor(s) would be best suited for this task.  Any editor you contact there would be able to get you further along in the process should that be necessary.  I know it can be frustrating to have to go step by step....please be patient, though.  There are policies that forbid edit warring and you do not want to hurt your chances of getting your contribution added by breaking any rules.  I hope this helps.  Please contact me if you need more info.  Good luck. (I'm copying this post to your talk page in case you're not watching this one)   Tide  rolls  18:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...
for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Some people obviously don't have enough to do. <font color="#ee3366">Lady <font color="#229922">of <font color="#0095c6">Shalott 19:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Wow....you're a member of the Alabama project...and there's a Scots wiki....I really need to get out of the Huggle cacoon more often :)   Tide  rolls  19:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a wide, wide, WikiWorld! lol <font color="#ee3366">Lady <font color="#229922">of <font color="#0095c6">Shalott 19:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Found the Scots wiki easier through your userbox than the "See complete list" link. Tecknolergie isn't my strong suit :o\   Tide  rolls  20:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Ta
Ta very much for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. :D Tresiden (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I kept waiting for you to change it. LOL, You're so fast...you must've looked away for a sec.  Anyway, you're welcome.  I know you'd do the same for me (if you haven't already.)  Keep up the good work.  Tide  rolls  20:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Leshan Grand Open
This article is not a test page, so I've removed the speedy tag. However, it appears to be a hoax, so I've nominated it for deletion. If you would like to participate in this deletion discussion, please comment at Articles for deletion/Long Island Ping Pong League. Regards, Cunard (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

WTF!
Hey... screwup... read the notes... like '' <-Geologic time scale#Terminology (insufficient half-assed coverage--->


 * Epoch is time units coresponding to series... Shit like this is why I don't bother helping this site much anymore. NO ONE should have to waste time twice because of a BOT and dumb editor. FIX IT! // 24.62.190.234 (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * re: Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Epoch (geology). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 14:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Get your facts straight before making unfounded accusations. My first edit here was 2004, my 10,000 not long after in 2005. Hint hint. // 24.62.190.234 (talk) 14:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I did read the notes, and "half-assed" is what caught my attention. Perhaps you would consider your adjective choices in the future....just a suggestion.  You would benefit from a bit of research as well.  Any person checking the recent changes makes mistakes and I have made my share.  After more than 20K edits my mistakes amount to around half a dozen.  I also have no problem recognizing them, attempting to learn from them and making whatever amends that are possible. Your manner of address has lessened my enthusiasm in this instance, I will simply say that my reversion was not helpful.  Since you have reverted to your original edit I'll consider my well intentioned, but mistaken reversion handled.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  15:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * In checking I see that you did not revert my change. I have attempted to make the redirect as you had it.  I found I didn't agree with your opinion, so I have put the redirect as you had it and will be going to the talk page of Geologic time scale to solicit input from the editors there.  Thanks  Tide  rolls  15:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

About IBA cocktails
My edit was due to the links on God Father and God Mother leading to a dead redirect-bookmark (the # part), which have nothing to do with the drinks in question. Changing the links then to dead-links with the correct name encourages someone that knows about these drinks to create those articles.

So please re-revert. 80.203.33.182 (talk) 20:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You broke the links with your edit. If the links were linking to an incorrect article in your opinion, have a go at correcting them.  But, just to red-link them is not a solution. Thanks.  Tide  rolls  20:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd rather have a dead link than a wrong link. A wrong link is not likely to be fixed. I havent got enough of a clue to make the articles in question, unfortunately. 80.203.33.182 (talk) 20:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * That is unfortunate. I'm wondering, then...how do you know they're incorrect?  Tide  rolls  20:33, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Because the link is called God Mother, links to Amaretto#Godmother, and a text-search in the article for 'mother' yields no result. Being a smartass helps no-one, and reverting edits because it is fun, without checking them out is detrimental to wikipedia. 80.203.33.182 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC).


 * I regret that you interpreted my inquiry as "smartass". I was trying to find out if you had some sources or citations that would support your position.  If you have some sources I would be happy to help you with your edit.  I'm of the opinion substituting red links for working links is detrimental to the project.  That's the reason I reverted the edit. Thanks.  Tide  rolls  21:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * As a general point I agree that red links are preferable to wrong links, at least a red link is not misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.0.54 (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks lots. I see your name on many reverts that my HG is too slow to load. So I'll be visiting your page soon. Till then, thanks for your help.  Tide  rolls  21:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the cleanup...
I hate trolls. 00:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Mmm...that would give them form and substance....trolls I here abjure :) You're welcome.  Tide  rolls  04:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Huggle
Say, what version of huggle are you using?  Rami R  17:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm using the "heavy" version. Why do you ask?  Tide  rolls  19:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I meant the version number. I'm asking because you gave via huggle a level 1 warning to a user whom I gave a level 4 warning one minute earlier. Having my warnings ignored by huggle isn't new to me, and it has been suggested that this is because of huggle users using old versions of huggle.  Rami R  20:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh...mine says 0.9.0 I haven't checked your diffs yet. I'll check and see if it means anything to my extremely non-technical brain.  Tide  rolls  20:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I am at a loss. I remember the revert I did but there was nothing special in my choice of action.  I simply let HG auto pick the warning.  I don't remember the warning level of the user before or after I reverted, though.  If you get any helpful feedback let me know (if it's no trouble). Thanks.  Tide  rolls  20:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sure, no problem.  Rami R  05:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks. You're doing good work as well...gives a n00b an idea of how things should be done.  See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  20:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, I try my best to help in cleaning up vandalism on Wikipedia. Are you a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. -- <font color="#0000ff">Michael  (Talk) 21:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I can't type today, Endways, I hope its ok with you... I add you to my friends list on my user page. Talk to you soon.-- <font color="#0000ff">Michael  (Talk) 22:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Why, haven't you responded? -- <font color="#0000ff">Michael  (Talk) 04:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Because I have very limited powers of concentration..LOL...Sorry, I have not conquered all the intricacies of HG operation and that means I'm probably taking 15 minutes for a two keystroke action. Once I get started it's difficult for me find a stopping point. As far as your friends list, yeah of course....it'd be an honor.  I've tried to read up on the Counter-Vandalism Unit and I think it would be great....especially from a feedback aspect.  So many edits I see look like they need reverting, but because of my inexperience on community standards I have reign in the reflexive urge.  If there is some type of discussion page there I would definitely have to visit regularly.  Thanks again for your help.  Tide  rolls  04:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Steven Foster
Excuse me, I am adding sourced material to Steven Foster. Not vandalism.--Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your polite post. I see no sources here...there are cites here, but ref name=doodah?  Oh...and I tried your links and they didn't load.  I'm going to assume good faith and attribute that to a technical problem with my browser, processor or sunspots maybe. Good luck and welcome to Wikipedia.  Tide  rolls  01:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Rick Fox
The edit is valid. Please LOOK before you revert. 70.108.108.246 (talk) 03:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The source you gave does NOT match what you say. <font color="Brown">Momo san Gespräch 03:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

What doesn't match? His son's name? His son's age? His son's mother? 70.108.108.246 (talk) 04:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Resolved, see my talk page. <font color="Brown">Momo san Gespräch 04:15, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Ælfheah of Canterbury

 * I need all the blessing that comes my way :) Thanks.  Tide  rolls  14:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Repeated thanks!
For the repeated rescue of my vandalized userpage! -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Looks like you've developed quite a fan base LOL  Tide  rolls  17:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism paging system.
This is designed as a (somewhat rudimentary) way to alert ME of high levels of vandalism.-- <font color="#0000ff">Michael  (Talk) 05:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello again
Are you an admin yet? You should try and get Adminship. Unless you don't want to. --Spongefrog (talk) 19:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC:


 * There are too many shortcomings in my resume at the moment. That you would suggest it is complimentary and much appreciated.  Thanks.  Tide  rolls  20:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

My edits to Meep
OK. Meep. —Preceding undated comment added 22:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC).

[warn]
Do you list warnings in order--if someone has a level 1, give them a level 2--and so on?  Elm-39 - T/C/N 18:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've been letting Huggle choose an automated warning. Have you noticed some problem with it? I have had some limited feed back on glitches...nothing serious yet.  Tide  rolls  18:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * None at all, so far. I was just wondering whether you picked a warning level in order.  Elm-39 - T/C/N 18:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's supposed to work that way. Since it's automated I'm always on the lookout for feedback.  If you see anything hinky, you'd be doing me a favor to let me know. Thanks.  Tide  rolls  18:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought, but I tend to find myself alone in the matter. Usually it has to do with time or month changes.  Elm-39 - T/C/N 18:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Time or month chnages within an article? Unless those arevery obivious they're hard for me to pick up.   Tide  rolls  18:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

A Message
Did You Know that you have the 1679th most edits on Wikipedia. Just thought you would like to know (plus this gets my edit count up) in case you don't know already. --Spongefrog (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I didn't know that. 99.999% vandalism reverts, too (a few mistakes in there for good measure).  That's a lot of grafitti.  Tide  rolls  03:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Message you sent me
You sent me a message about editing a page and how it was reverted afterwards, I have never done such as editing a wikipedia page. Ever. So why did you send that message? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.217.108.192 (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Preceding edits
Hi, thanks for huggling Shane today. You missed a preceding bad edit on that one, but I guess was probably just by chance -- I can see you are doing a lot of good work! - Fayenatic (talk) 18:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I only saw the latest bon mot on my Huggle screen. Thanks for the backup and the words of enouragement.  Tide  rolls  19:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Reactorsaurus
'''You have reached an archived discussion. Please do not edit this page. If you wish to contact User:Tide rolls you may do so here: User talk:Tide rolls Thank You.'''

Read the BBC news article that is being referenced. An article on the nuclear waste removing robot is in the works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.156.133.162 (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That's the point of my edit summary. I cannot get the the link you list to work.  Please post it here for me so I may read the reference. Thanks.  Tide  rolls  20:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Here you go: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/highlands_and_islands/8033763.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.156.133.162 (talk) 20:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Many thanks.  Tide  rolls  20:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

No problem
No problem David0811 (Talk) 23:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)