User talk:TiffanyTran

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello TiffanyTran! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Hasna Xhukiçi -

Dear Wikipedias users: Please add reliable sources for Hasna Xhukiçi whom I create an wikipedia for in 2009. Its been truly hard for me to find any good sources on Hasna.

Blocked as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 02:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Might not be a sock
Hi. Could someone take another look at the TiffanyTran unblock request? I am the editor that started the SPI that got her blocked, and I didn't include her. I did at one point think she was a sock. The sockmaster and the obvious socks were making an edit that asserted a man named Al Maiman took 2nd runner up in the Mister World 2010 contest. Here's an example of the edit the socks made over and over --  It was false. After the sockmaster was blocked, TT came onto the article and added different information about Al Maiman's place in a different contest. At that point I thought she might be a sock. I found sources for what I could of her edits, and warned her about including unsourced information about Al Maiman. . She edited Mister World 2010 several more times after that, but never added back the information about Al Maiman. . She made this edit at Manhunt International 2010 and unfortunately didn't provide a citation. She has made numerous edits since then, and none of them have left information about Al Maiman in an article. This is a very different editing pattern than what the sockmaster and the obvious socks exhibited. The fact that she didn't re-enter the information that I deleted from Mister World 2010 is behavior very different from that of the sockmaster and supports her statement that she isn't a sock. It's true that she didn't start editing the article until after the sockmaster had been blocked, but she does have a prior history of editing similar articles about pageants. I think this is a case when AGF is in order. Susfele (talk) 21:10, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have requested a review of the block at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive241. –MuZemike 21:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've unblocked. Fences  &amp;  Windows  15:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Advice
Hello Tiffany. It was unfortunate that you got caught up in the fall-out from another user getting blocked. In future I would suggest that you only add information found in reliable sources to Wikipedia, rather than information found on forums or other informal websites - Wikipedia articles should be verifiable. Always cite your sources. To help you in your editing, you might wish to have a more experienced editor mentor you, you can find someone to do this at Adopt-a-User. Fences &amp;  Windows  15:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank You Admins for helping me be unblocked, and 'Fences' for your advice! Tiffany Tran ♥


 * No problem. Could you please go into "My preferences", go to the tab "Editing" and untick "Mark all edits minor by default"? You're marking edits as minor that aren't. See Help:Minor edit. Fences  &amp;  Windows  13:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Please take care of the minor edit issue, as all of your contribution is still minor. Please ONLY use "this is a minor edit" check-box when making a minor change, like a comma or space or dot..etc. Good luck and happy editing :)  AdvertAdam   talk  08:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Mister International 2011, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Man of Steel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)