User talk:TikTokJournalist

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeshua Oneal (July 31) =  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Loksmythe were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeshua Oneal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeshua Oneal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jeshua_Oneal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loksmythe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jeshua_Oneal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Loksmythe (talk) 00:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Azazus has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Azazus. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 04:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeshua Oneal


A tag has been placed on Jeshua Oneal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeshua Oneal


A tag has been placed on Jeshua Oneal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeshua Oneal


A tag has been placed on Jeshua Oneal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Azazus


A tag has been placed on Azazus, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Reply To Decline: Please read my statement below. I do not have two accounts. Its all explained below. But you all would rather accuse me of something without me even having a fair chance at proving what Im saying is true. I dont understand. I stated below what happened and everything I say it true. A simple google search of azazus or either myself Jeshua Oneal will show what I said below is factual. This is beyond me..

I DO NOT HAVE MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS
IT IS BEING SAID I HAVE MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS. THIS IS FALSE ALLEGATIONS FROM ASSUMPTIONS. I DO NOT HAVE TWO ACCOUNTS NOR HAVE I ABUSED THE SYSTEM. SOMEONE PLEASE ALLOW ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO STATE MY DEFENSE SO I CAN BE UNBLOCKED AND GET MY PAGES BACK... PLEASE.
 * If you don’t have multiple accounts, why was another account (named Azazus) making the same edits you did To try to make an Azazus article? only (talk) 22:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

All due respect, before accusing people of false allegations do yall investigate? Look at my email. If you can. My email says Jeshua in it.. Hence I'm Jeshua Oneal. He's Azazus. We both are in each others Articles. We were assisting each other so our articles would not be bias in no means. We both are of celebrity status but did not want our pages to be biased. Maybe we went by it the wrong way but I can rest assure you that I am who I say I am. And Azazus is just that. Azazus. We know each other. IF you look at the articles you will see that I am being truthful. I am a very honest individual. I do not partake in doing anything that would get my page banned. We were just trying to get our articles done the proper way. Now all of our hard work is gone. I honestly feel like crying. You may not understand but see I have a family to feed and this wikipedia was the last piece of our brands. Everything we said in the articles were factual. And everything we sourced was accurate. I sat here for hours working on the articles and so did Azazus. I have no issue giving you our emails or phone numbers or what ever needs to be giving to prove my identity and to also prove to you what Im saying is true. Azazus and I both need our pages and our pages back. Atleast tell us what we did wrong with the pages so we can fix it. But deleting our pages and banning our accounts for something we didnt do doesnt fix anything. Its not right and its unethical. I am asking you to please allow me the opportunity to prove myself. Thank you. (TikTokJournalist (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)).
 * I think you're misunderstanding Wikipedia's purpose a bit here. You say You may not understand but see I have a family to feed and this wikipedia was the last piece of our brands.  Wikipedia is not a place to advertise yourself and promote your "brand."  It is an encyclopedia.  Currently, it doesn't seem that the subjects of the articles meet our Notability (music) criteria.
 * We have very strict rules against editors editing with conflict of interests. If you were unblocked, what articles do you plan to work on that are not Jeshua Oneal, Azazus, or Laeno?   only (talk) 23:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

I would work on other articles pertaining to music or entertainment since that is my profession. Now may I ask a few questions? I dont want to get banned for doing so... You seem to be more understanding then others. According to what Notability (music) states since Azazus and myself are both associated with Major labels and are also associated with major artists. I myself for almost four years. How do we not fall into the said category of notability? I saw someone earlier deny the man who introduced us to the late XXXTentacion and his page was cited and sourced just as ours were... Im beginning to believe that this is deeper than what we think. I truly dont believe the previous administrators came for me because of issues on my page. I looked on his page and there are so many complaints of him being bias and discriminating towards people and going on uncalled banning sprees. Conflict of interest did not play a part into the articles. Everything was factual and fully notated.

As you can see here everything on my page was completely relevant and cited correctly. Just as other TikTok stars and musicians are. With the same sources. I have already checked and documented that and can provide the list if needed. So why is it that others can "break the rules" per se but then when it comes to me and Azazus we get singled out for actually doing what was asked of us but everytime we corrected something... something else got added to the dilemna. this doesnt make sense to me. As I just stated I have a list full of entertainers, some big, some small that did exactly the same as we did when it comes to sources. Also.. I even came across pages without any cites or sources at all. One even had a source with their name spelled completely wrong. So how is the in anyway truly about what was originally stated? Now you see why I say this is bias and quite discriminating if you ask me. I just dont get it.

My page example below - Along with Azazus -

Jeshua Oneal Crook (born March 2, 1993), better known by his stage name Jeshua Oneal, formerly J.O. Crook is an American rapper, singer, songwriter, DJ, actor, and entrepreneur. He rose to prominence in 2018 when his single "This and That " was picked up and distributed by The Orchard a parent branch of Major Label Sony Music. Jeshua has released a stream of popular singles, including "This And That", "Own Way"  & more. Jeshua has opened up for various major artists, including but not limited to, Just Brittany & Rich Boy. In 2020 he made his impression on the TikTok community as a influencer, accumulating over 20K+ followers.

Jeshua Oneal is also the founder of record label Laeno Entertainment, established in 2008.

Early Life
Jeshua was born and raised in Foley, Alabama. His name "Jeshua" derives from the Hebrew Biblical name, "Yehoshua"

Musical style
His musical style is unique. The pitch-correcting audio processor Auto-Tunes is used at times. Grammy Award winning artist T-Pain is among one of the influences of Jeshua's music.

Early life
Walton Jr was born in Mobile, Alabama; but raised in Foley, Alabama. His musical alias "Azazus" is a combination of two biblical figures: Azazel and Jesus. Walton Jr was brought up in a Baptists household. His father, Dennis Lee Walton Sr, was a traveling independent Gospel musician. He got his first taste of entertainment business when he and Jeshua Oneal auditioned for a record deal at Foley Civic Center at thirteen years old. Shortly after graduating Foley High School, Walton Jr relocated to Gainesville, Florida. At age nineteen, Azazus turned his bedroom into a home music studio, using laptop, a USB mic, and homemade pop-filter.

Musical style
Azazus incorporates pitch-correction and ambient reverb in his sounds, inspired by famed musicians such as T-Pain, Drake, Kayne West, Ty Dolla Sign, and Blackbear that use Auto-Tune to process their vocals.

August 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. only (talk) 02:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Location of dispute Jeshua Oneal

Dispute overview Yesterday, My pages and all of my edits were trolled by users discriminating and lying against me and what I stand for as a person. I understand the job of the administrators. I also understand my rights. The way that they trolled me yesterday was uncalled for and completely unnecessary. My page was full of sources and actually credible. The subject I wrote about fell into the guidelines of a artist for this site due to the relationship with a major label and also being on the charts in the UK on BBC radio. All of which were sourced. It started with one administrator and ended up with numerous ones attacking my work that I worked hours making sure it was perfected for Wikipedia to publish. Then I was lied on without hesitation or proof but from a very bad assumption. It was said I was being a "sock puppet". Which was far from the case. I have proof of everything. Yet when I stated my response to defend the accusation of which I was accused of... No one had anything to say. That is when I contacted people higher up at Wikipedia and my attorney. This is not ok. The same sources I used are those of which alot of people who have been on this site as recording artists have used. and I have proof of that. Sites that are said not be credible apparently are credible with those of some administrators choosing. I even went to see comments on some administrators pages and I see there are many repeat offenses of this type of action. I have my rights and will stand up for them. I would love someone to make this situation right so I really dont have to go through all of this. I have let people lie on me and run me over my whole life. This stops today. I am a nice human being and I have a kind spirit. So yes it hurts to see people treat others in this manner or let power go above their had. I am asking a sincere look over with this situation. I also asking that the blocks be released and my pages atleast be put to draft so someone can give me valid reasoning of the issue.

Users involved TikTokJournalist, only, QueerEcofeminist, GPL93, JPGORDON, Materialscientist

Resolving the dispute Previous steps to resolve the dispute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TikTokJournalist I have also had my attorney contact the Ms. Maher & Mr. Wales in regards to this issue.

How you think we can help resolve the dispute? Unblock my account and atleast bring back the draft of my page so someone can assist for it to be published. Although the sources are already credible and the page is of a public figure who falls under the guidelines for music artist on wikipedia. The page states "atleast one" of the guidelines. The page "Jeshua Oneal" that I had up fit 2. So how is this justified or is it just plain discrimination? I would like a valid response into why I was treated that way yesterday and lied on and slandered

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. only (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Laeno


Hello, TikTokJournalist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laeno".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)