User talk:Tikisim

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Tikisim, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Low-level laser therapy have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I must have forgotten to cite the actual journal I got the quote from, and only cited the ones that the article relied upon. Next time I will be more cautious with my quotation marks as well. Tikisim (talk) 04:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Toxic shock syndrome
Hello, thanks for your edit to toxic shock syndrome. However, I have adjusted the citation style you used; it would be better to use the Visual Editor's automatic citation system, where you paste in the DOI/PMID and it does the rest of the formatting work for you. See the relevant section in the VisualEditor user guide. Also, I've replaced terms like "pyrexia" and "hypotension" with plainer English words; see the technical terminology section of the medical manual of style. Graham 87 02:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I noticed that your Edit summaries are so short ("Added content") as to not be informative. Please consider a bit more information, for example what section edited and what you did, for example "Added text and references to Diagnosis." David notMD (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Papaya, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:MEDRS and use reviews as sources for medical content. Zefr (talk) 04:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Anterior cingulate cortex. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''This edit is a mess. Please slow down and review the Manual of Style. On several articles where I have reviewed your edits, you are using formats (not needed) and ignoring conventional formatting of WP:MOS. See WP:CIT for citing references and using correct formats.'' Zefr (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Citer
Citer is a useful tool for formatting sources. Use the DOI, URL, PMID, PMC or ISBN (books) ID from the upper left pick list, click "submit", then copy the resulting formatted reference into the article. Also, observe WP:REFPUNCT - the punctuation comes before, not after, the citation. Zefr (talk) 04:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chili pepper, you may be blocked from editing. Your edit here was an egregious overinterpretation of lab studies (which we don't use in sections entitled "medicinal", "health effects" or "nutrition" because they are too preliminary to be interpreted for an encyclopedia. Use WP:MEDRS reviews. Further, stating the chili pepper consumption had effects on cardiovascular disease or cancer was also beyond the actual conclusion from the authors of the review - read the article. They point out the studies were of poor quality and only 4 studies out of thousands could be used. Your edits have potential to mislead non-scientific users. Zefr (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Patellar dislocation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Don't use "emerging" sources - that is usually primary research too preliminary for an encyclopedia. Use WP:MEDRS reviews.'' Zefr (talk) 21:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

August 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Tannic acid, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. ''Read WP:MEDRS - none of the sources you added come close to meeting that standard. You seem to be ignoring prior warnings about putting misinformation from non-MEDRS sources into articles.'' Zefr (talk) 03:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry for any troubles I caused. If you have time, could you tell me which sources you disagreed with and explain why they are unreliable?Tikisim (talk) 03:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You are a concern for editing medical content on Wikipedia because you have diverse activity across many topics, but your addition of dubious content from unreliable sources is suspect, as it does not adhere to MEDRS. Take the time to read the whole guideline, paying particular attention to WP:MEDASSESS which defines the hierarchy for choosing high-quality sources.
 * In the tannic acid article, you added sources from chemistry (not MEDRS), alternative medicine (unreliable for medical content) in a Hindawi journal (listed as low-quality and unreliable on WP:CITEWATCH), and a phytotherapy journal (not MEDRS).
 * You also often refer to emerging trends. Do not do this, as it is your opinion, WP:SYNTH, unless it is stated in a MEDRS review article.
 * Also, repeatedly in several articles, you do not adhere to WP:REFNAME. Once a source is used and formatted with a name, the next time it is used should not include the whole reference again, but rather its refname is applied. Your edits need to be screened for accuracy by other editors, consuming time unnecessarily. Please learn and follow the refname procedure. Zefr (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)