User talk:Tikiwont/Archive 12

Rosenkreuzstilette page
Can you please bring back the Rosenkreuzstilette page? We have a site with legitimate information about the game here: - http://rks.wikia.com/wiki/Rosenkreuzstilette_Wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnubisOracle (talk • contribs) 16:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that is just another Wiki. We're looking for what we call here reliable external sources on RosenkreuzStilette. Please check that link and enjoy the game in any case.--Tikiwont (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

EZ Shopper
I had just finished rewriting my EZ Shopper page as I had been told I would be given time to do. When I tried to save the changes I got a notice that my page had been deleted. What's up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GratefulDave (talk • contribs) 17:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, there might have been a conflict. I've looked at a version of 17:02, but deleted one of 17:10. So i'll restore that to your usrpace under User:GratefulDave/EZ Shopper for further improvement in as far this is possible. If after reviewing our guidelines you think it fits, you can move it back, otherwise please mark it yourself for deletion.--Tikiwont (talk) 17:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GratefulDave (talk • contribs) 17:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It's been hardly improved with contact reinserted so its has been deleted in article space and I'm undoing the userfication. Bets starting form scratch, but as pointed out by others, it seems that neither is now the right time nor are you the right person to so.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Could you bring back The Pop Culture Guy
I wasn't given a clear reason for the deletion of the page but advertising but we weren't advertising. We were telling about the pop culture guy. To talk about him who had to mentiona few things about him and the site he run. This doesn't make sense not one bit. Review over the last changes we ever made and tell me how is that adverising! Roberts.delano (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Roberts.delano
 * I've deleted The Pop Culture Guy as it did not indicate sufficiently that the article may meet our guidelines for inclusion. See also WP:BIO. And how would writing about and extensively quoting yourself not amount to self-promotion? (I'm now off for the night)--Tikiwont (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

SOMEONE STOLE MY STUFF
THANKS TO THIS STUPID THING I HAVE TOT ALK TO YOU ON SOMEONE DELETED MY BLOG AND CHANGED MY PASSWORD! I'M ANGRY I HAVE THIS STUFF ON PRIVATE LIKE AN EMAIL! GOSH! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberts.delano (talk • contribs) 18:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry to hear that you're distressed but it isn't clear to me what you're referring to now. I tried to answer your previous query regarding a deleted Wikipedia article above, but I sincerely hope nobody deleted or blocked your actual blog and if so, there isn't anything I can do about it.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks but
Thanks for the message on my talk page but I don't fully agree. For example Varilux So I am the second to tag it as DB-G11 which means at two users think it is spam, therefore I don't think that the tag should be removed and the issue should be put up for debate. To me it still reads as commercial rather than encyclopaedic and I don't think that you have the right to remove the tag without a further debate.

Both ParaYoga and Thenpandi Singam carry no citations or references to make them encyclopaedic. I might give in that a speedy deletion isn't totally relevant but again I feel that there should be discussion on the articles, not just one person deciding that they are not ready to be deleted.

Happy to discuss or take for AFD. RichardLowther (talk) 21:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

A LITTLE CONFUSED
Um, I've been adding stuff to Wikipedia for a while now. Not sure why I'm getting this greeting now. Davidamescurtis (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)davidamescurtis

Historical inaccuracies in the film Zulu
Thanks for your mesage. It was my first Merge and after I'd done it I went out and realised while I was walking around the shops that I hadn't left a record of the previous decision! I'll watch that next time. Jack1956 (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome message
Yes, thanks. Wikipedia is a rare & possibly unique contribution to humanity. I shall always do my best to comply with the spirit thereof so, if I do break any of your rules, you can be assured it will be wholly unintentional. --Dendropithecus (talk) 01:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Videogames
Thank you for your notes regarding the speedy delete tags I placed on several video games that did not seem notable. Based upon your note I understand that speedy deletion A7 does not apply to video games. What is the proper wiki procedure to follow when spotting a new page for a video game that does not appear notable, or that should only perhaps be included on the company page for the company that produces it? Is there another speedy deletion criteria that applies? Or is it AfD only? Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * AfD would apply to most and that page also lists possible exemptions and alternatives such as Speedy deletion in case of copyright problmes (G12), blatant misinformation (G3) or spam (G11) that apply to all articles. A7 does apply to browser games, though. Another alternative is proposed deletion for rather uncontroversial stuff. Merging is also an alternative to be considered before deletion, but I'm having the impression that Wikipedians are in this case here more focused on the games than the companies. WikiProject Video games might be a helpful address.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick reply. I figured it was AfD.  I'll utilize that in the future when the pages don't fall under G12, G11, or G3.  Thank you! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

General Webb
Well done - wikipedia at its best! Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Harry Benjamin
Hi. I've noticed you're processing the AfD when I've closed it already. Feel free to alter my decision. Greetings. --Tone 19:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, I'll just close the RFD that led me there.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for closing Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_September_19. Could you remove the RfD notice at Harry Benjamin Syndrome? Normally I'd just do it myself, but I want it to be clear this was procedurally completed by an admin per consensus, and not a unilateral decision by one editor. Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 12:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. I merely forgot and it was protected anyways.--Tikiwont (talk) 17:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)