User talk:Tikiwont/Archive 20

Martin Coleman (American Football)
Dear Tikiwont,

Before you commented on this article and you stated that it did not meet meet the guideline for notably. "was already said above at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Martin_Coleman_.28American_Football.29: Even if he actually existed and had been part of the team, he still wouldn't meet our inclusion guideline for athletes. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

There has been some new development that would correct this and bring it to the notability standards. In order to complete this the article needs to updated accept by administrator because it was removed as being a hoax. The issue was one of hoax because there sources to collaborate that is isn't a hoax, however I agree with you it was an issue of notability. Please remove it from the hoax list so that it can be correct and brought up to standards. Just add the Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability stub. It could be updated.

http://wearesc.com/news/story.php?article=4268

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.102.193.211 (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * sorry for the summer delay. I'm not seeing anything relevant at the link you gave, so the issue is in any case insufficient verifiable sources for an encyclopedic article. The way to demonstrate the opposite is to write a draft stub actually based on such sources and then contact say the deleting administrator, B. Vague discussions won't get us anywhere.--Tikiwont (talk) 06:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Chess Attack
Hi! Would you mind taking a look at that article's talk page, where I responded to your tagging it. As I say there, I don't have any strong feelings about it, so if you want to nominate it for deletion, that's ok with me, even though the last edition of Pritchard's was published before this variant came to be. But I feel it should either be AfD'ed or the tag removed. Cheers! Asav (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. The notability tag only indicates the current lack of independent sources but I don't know if this can be fixed nor does this imply I should nominate it for deletion.--Tikiwont (talk) 06:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)