User talk:Tikmok

Welcome
 Hello Tikmok, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Tikmok, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 06:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reticular formation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coronal and Medulla ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Reticular_formation check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Reticular_formation?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Depersonalization ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Depersonalization check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Depersonalization?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Stress, General population and Trauma
 * Lorazepam ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lorazepam check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lorazepam?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Refractory period

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Depersonalization, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stress, General population and Trauma ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Depersonalization check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Depersonalization?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Thought disorder
Hello Tikmok - I've been going through the page and see that you have done quite a lot of work. There does seem to be many problems with defining and presentation on page. I've only just been looking at the Word Usage section and been made aware of just how much confusion there is. My initial thought was to change the page name to Formal thought disorder but ngrams favours thought disorder. Something is very amiss when the definitions used by APA are different from those used in DSM-5 and elsewhere. The later articles that I've been using from 2018 Lancet and a 2019 review are more relevant to Formal thought disorder perhaps an overview later after further edits. Best --Iztwoz (talk) 15:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Iztwoz. Thkx for the heads up.  It seems pretty clear from the psychiatric texts that this word isn't sharply or commonly defined; therefore, the article should present as such and makes it clear which one the section/paragraph is talking about.  I personally prefer neither terms, but note that even if the article is changed to "formal thought disorder", this confusing situation still has to be presented somewhere else.  Since the academics don't agree, I don't think all the wikipedians will agree either.  Whichever way seems fine to me, as long as we present the confusion in an article, or in multiple related articles.  Maybe a possible threshold for splitting into multiple articles is when the materials at hand shouldn't be all in one place. --Tikmok (talk) 05:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bitwarden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Core values.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)