User talk:Till

UKchartsplus.co.uk
If you are trying to clean those out, this link shows every article.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
--Pine✉ 04:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
— AARON  &bull; TALK   11:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Pink's So What = the word "dance-pop" appeared on the main section?
Hi, Till. I just want your help, and I'm afraid that User:Widr don't give other editors permission to revert, especially music genres. Pink's 2008 hit "So What" is actually a pop rock song (as in the infobox and composition section), but suddenly the word "dance-pop" appeared on the main section, it doesn't make sense. Thus, I don't think it has "dance-pop" influence, because it has not supported by citation (does not support genre notes). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.177.33 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * You are right - it should be pop rock instead of dance pop. Till  08:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you :) Till  01:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks Penguin, and thanks again for going through the entire article voluntarily :) Nice to see you back from a well-deserved break too. Till  03:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
— AARON  &bull; TALK   14:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Push the Button (Sugababes song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Change (Sugababes song)/GA1
See Talk:Change (Sugababes song)/GA1 review. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  20:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks Till  01:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welkom. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  11:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks :) Till  12:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Change (Sugababes song)
Allen3 talk 22:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Re:Angels with Dirty Faces (song)
Ok, here's the issue. You're right that "The topics seem to be closely interrelated and relevant", but wrong that this means that NFCC#8 is met. If what you're saying is true, then you would be, for instance, justified in using a non-free image of a dead singer in every article about their music or a non-free image of a dead author in every article about their books- the topics are clearly closely interrelated and relevant. In fact, in most cases, what the singer/author looked like is not going to be relevant. NFCC#8 requires that an image is "used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." The question is this- does knowing what that character looks like significantly increase reader understanding of the topic? No, certainly not. Would readers be unable to understand the article without the image? Yes, clearly. Further, you've added the image to the article again, and again you've not even attempted to write a rationale for the use of the image. I've seen users blocked for doing that. I'm going to remove the image again- while I'm happy to discuss the inclusion, could you please not add it back- the NFCC explain that the onus is on you to demonstrate that the image should be included, and so until you have, it should stay out. J Milburn (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * We have to use reasonable judgement, and reasonable people may disagree, but in this case it's pretty clear. Sure, someone may never have watched the PG, but this article isn't actually about the cartoon, it's about a song. The fact that you're citing the picture of the Grammy in Cry Me a River (Justin Timberlake song) shows that you really are not clear on what the issue is here. That's a freely licensed image, unlike the one you're trying to insert, and so is not subject to the same, deliberately strict, rules. You're welcome to use free images pretty much wherever and however you like. The case with non-free images is not even close to that. If you had a freely licensed image of the character, I would have no problem with that. If you're keen to have an illustration, you may be able to find a free image of the character's voice actor or of the show's creator. J Milburn (talk) 10:09, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Little Mix
Hey, random question? Are you a fan of Little Mix? Do you perhaps have the CD liner for their DNA album? - littlemixlove (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Just a Little Bit (Mutya Buena song)
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Just a polite notification
I've restored Phoebe Brown because she is notable for more than one event and thus cannot be redirected.-- Laun  chba  ller  18:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Angels with Dirty Faces (song)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

European Hot 100 cut
It's still there for older dates, but no new entries have been added for quite a while. A lot of charts got dropped on the latest overhaul.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited She's like a Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stronger (Sugababes song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

re: Sample
Hi, with regard to your post on my talk page, I have fallen away from doing audio samples for about the last year or so. Maybe a little longer. Much of what I was doing involved cleanup of non-standard uploads. I did that heavily for about six months and then sporadically for another year or so, and I have all the tools to do it still, and I don't think I'm totally done with it, but for the last year or so I've been heavily involved with article creation especially with WikiProject Earthquakes. It's been taking all my time, aside from maintenance, on WP. So for now, I will keep it under consideration, maybe down the road. Or, if you're feeling adventurous, there's some discussion on how to do the samples here. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000   01:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That is fine and thanks for considering. Till  09:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Help
I set my Twinkles preference to not keep a log of my CSD tags but it has not changed. Till 09:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe you have to bypass your browser cache for the change to take effect. See Bypass your cache. Huon (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Too Lost in You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Taio Cruz discography/archive1
Hey, Till. I currently have an FLC out for Taio Cruz discography, but reviews have not been pouring in, to put it mildly, and since I can only have one open nomination at a time I'm struggling to get other projects finished (it has been out for nearly two months now). I understand you're a busy editor, but would you able to give me some comments at the FLC, so I will know how to improve it and hopefully finally get it passed? Your ideas and time would be greatly appreciated. I Am Rufus  &bull;  Conversation is a beautiful thing.  16:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Opinion
Could you opine on this matter? Regards &mdash; Robin   (talk)  14:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Notifications box replacement prototypes released
Hey Till; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Re:NFCC
I'd be inclined to say that both are violations- there's also potentially problems in both articles with excess cover images. Unless the bonus covers are in some way significant in their appearance, their use probably doesn't add significantly to the article, and so they fail NFCC#8. As for getting the images deleted quickly- if you simply remove them from the article, they'll be tagged as orphans and deleted within a few days, providing nobody reverts you. J Milburn (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Re:Call the Shots
Fair- thanks for your note. The lead length isn't the biggest problem in the world, and the Discogs sources (which I did notice) are used only to report that the song appeared on particular releases- a long way from controversial information, so I was happy enough to let it slide. The YouTube problem I missed, and I wasn't aware of the badchart point. Thank you for bringing them to my attention; I will add to my review. J Milburn (talk) 15:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Cœur de pirate discography FLC
Hello. The Cœur de pirate discography is currently at FLC. I have worked extensively on it and hope that you can leave some comments to help it reach Featured List status. Thanks! :) – Underneath-it-All (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Man (Jade Ewen song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for New Year (song)
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your reverts of my edits
I'm trying to work out why you object to my edits, and exactly what "This wrongs the references" means. I presume you objected to me removing the 'publisher' fields, this is actually done in line with the practice laid down in Template:Citation/doc, which states " " Other facets of the edits is the italic rendering of the publications. You will find that the italicisation or otherwise are in line with WP:ITALICS, as well as the styles adopted for each of the publication per their Wikipedia articles. I'd like to understand from your viewpoint how this makes the references "wrong". Regards, --  Ohc  ¡digame!¿que pasa? 08:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Your "edits" are not fixing the articles at all. Many reviewers at GA are adamant that the references should include the publisher with the work, so no, your removing them is not helping. And the page you cite says that they're normally not included, not prohibited. Till  09:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks Robin ^^ Till  03:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  18:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
On hold  —  AARON  &bull; TALK   14:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for List of awards and nominations received by Sugababes
Gatoclass 00:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
I've reviewed the nomination. — AARON  &bull; TALK   16:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

S&M
Hi Till, Some time ago you commented (and opposed) at FAC on the S&M (song) article. The article is now back at Peer Review, having gone through something of a good copyedit by me, and a further ce/review by Cassianto. The original nominator Aaron is still very much involved in the process and we would both be delighted if you would give any comments you could at the PR, prior to the next attempt at FAC. Many thanks if you are able to help. - SchroCat (talk) 20:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * As per the above, the article is now at FAC. If you have the chance we'd be delighted to hear your comments. If you're too tied up with other bits and pieces, then it's not a problem at all. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soul Sound
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Soul Sound you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 10:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soul Sound
The article Soul Sound you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Soul Sound for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 16:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soul Sound
The article Soul Sound you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soul Sound for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 15:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Irish Cert prior 2005
Hi

I saw you were once looking for data for irish certified prior 2005. Did you find a source? Szaboci (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Missing Wikipedians
Saw you had a lot of contributions to Wikipedia but haven't been here since June. I've added you to the page above, but if you come back, please remember to take your name off it, or alternatively, you can undo the edit with a summary that you don't want to be listed (that way it'll be there in your edit history for anyone else who becomes tempted to list you there). God bless,  Lazy Bastard  Guy  17:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

A year and a half after you opposed my RfA
I am inviting you to leave me some feedback, 18 months after you opposed my RfA. Do you still believe I am not fit to be an admin? Do you believe I have been able to improve past the concerns you have brought up? Do not be afraid of being too harsh, I am specifically welcoming criticism as I believe it is the best way to improve and I am always looking to learn from my mistakes. I am particularly looking for feedback as to whether you have objections to myself lifting the self-imposed 1RR restriction I had agreed to towards the end of my RfA. If you don't have time to comment, don't fret it either, this is nothing I'll lose sleep over. :) ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sugababes - No Can Do screenshot.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sugababes - No Can Do screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of So Fresh: The Hits of Spring 2012


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on So Fresh: The Hits of Spring 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ilovechristianmusic  (Tell Me Something!)  23:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Someone like You", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — Llywelyn II   17:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Today's featured article/May 24, 2016
Hi, I'll start work on this one today. You nominated the article at WP:FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 13:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Precious
We miss you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

New newsletter for Notifications
Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hey Girl (Justin Bieber song) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hey Girl (Justin Bieber song). Since you had some involvement with the Hey Girl (Justin Bieber song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 17:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Tempt, Tease and Touch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tempt, Tease and Touch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tempt, Tease and Touch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aoba47 (talk) 19:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)