User talk:Till/Archive 1

Veet
Hi there - it was not wrong of you to nominate Veet for deletion. I feel as you do - that a damn shampoo does not warrant a page in an encyclopedia, but the rules of wikipedia take some learning. I hope you will continue to contribute here on Wikipedia and not be put off by the failure of your Veet Afd. - Its mostly fun here but it has its occasional confusing moments. :) Mark   Dask  14:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Choker(film)
I invite you back to the AFD and the article, as my google-foo is in high gear.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your revisiting. Thanks.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:45, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Penno
Hello. Regarding your demand for a reputable source for the above, I really think you are being a little pedantic. I grew up in this district and it was always Penno, or West Penno, just as Normanhurst was always Normo. If the issue was controversial it would be different, but in Wikipedia, as in life, inflexibly applying rules rarely leads to a satisfying outcome. Rumiton (talk) 15:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Megan Fox
Hello, Till I Go Home. Mind weighing in on the above linked section, since it has to do with two edits made by you? Flyer22 (talk) 21:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, again, Till. If you aren't still watching the talk page, I wanted to let you know that I replied again about the fear of flying information. Flyer22 (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

inre Michael Ray Bower
Though we're lacking SIGCOV on this actor, it is verifiable that he meets WP:ANYBIO in that when younger he did receive a notable award for "Best Young Actor Co-starring in a Cable Series" for Salute Your Shorts, and his body of work is itself verifiable. My thought is that even if a topic might fail WP:GNG, the instructions at WP:N allow that "A topic is also presumed notable if it meets the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right"... sending us to the subject-specific WP:ENT and its criteria of "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." I know SIGCOV is the easiest way to determine notability... it's just that guideline does not mandate it as the only way by its offering alternatives. The article is being edited to address requirements for sources verifying his acreer and award.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for taking the time to provide feedback. This is an important distinction you have made; that there are other ways to determine notability of the subject in question. While it is apparent the article meets WP:NACTOR, I feel that with references added to the article since being nominated for deletion, the subject does indeed pass the WP:GNG as well. I've used strike-through to withdraw my !vote because of this. Till I Go Home (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Heidi Montag, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Maxim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Angels Brought Me Here, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello Till I Go Home, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 09:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Acalamari. I will ensure that I do not misuse this privilege. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

"Angels Brought Me Here"
I've finished my major edits at "Angels Brought Me Here" and believe the article has been improved sufficiently to retain its GA status. If you have additional concerns could you reply at the appropriate venue. Aside: I noticed that you created a GA page at Talk:Angels Brought Me Here/GA1 (usually made for assessing an article's original GA nomination) whereas I would have gone for a GAR page, e.g. Good article reassessment/Angels Brought Me Here/2. In any case the final decision is yours, my vote is Keep.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Aside: ignore those comments I now see Good article reassessment/Angels Brought Me Here/1 was closed as a procedural because of GAN missing. Sorry about that.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Good to see its kept its GA, thanks for raising the concerns re:its previous status. Its been a pleasure working with you on this.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * And thank you to you, for the major cleanup you undertook to maintain the article's GA quality. Till I Go Home (talk) 07:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited About a Girl (Sugababes song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Heidi Montag
The article Heidi Montag you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Heidi Montag for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Sitush (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Heidi Montag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anchor Blue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited About a Girl (Sugababes song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Get Sexy
Hi ! How are you? Sorry for stopping the review, but I had a family dead case. I will probably continue the review tonight, or early morning. Thanks for understanding. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  17:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I am done. You have 7 days to resolve the issues. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  21:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi! That's OK. It gave me time to work on some other articles. I think I have addressed all the issues. Till I Go Home (talk) 01:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I passed it. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  09:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yay! :) It's been a pleasure working with you on this. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your first GA?:) — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  09:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup lol. My first GAN failed. I'm working on About a Girl now. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep the good work. I am thinking of taking "Whiplash" for review. I am working on "Don't Stop the Music". I nominated "Unfaithful" and "Hate That I Love You", but nobody reviewed them, still. :S — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  09:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 20:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! Till I Go Home (talk) 11:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * About a Girl (Sugababes song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Robert Orton


 * Get Sexy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Capital FM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Kim Kardashian
I reverted your deletion of the talk section because I feel it serves to document G90025's editing history. I do understand that it also throws accusations at you personally, and I am sympathetic to that. I made the decision because the community itself immediately backed up your edits and began to investigate User:G90025 instead. This talk is a classic WP:BOOMERANG. Coffeepusher (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * MelbourneStar has just reverted my edit, making this conversation a moot point. Have a great day.Coffeepusher (talk) 15:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Get It (Havana Brown song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Digital download


 * Ugly (Sugababes song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to ARIA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Who Says
Hi, I don't know if you were the one who removed my name from the nomination of Who Says for GAN, but I see that you have made a lot of changes in the article in preparation for its second nomination, but I did write most of the article, therefore that is why I added my name as well. Candy o32  17:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You abandoned the first review which the reviewer failed so I fixed the article and renominated it. Till I Go Home (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I did not abandon the first review, I was unable to get on Wikipedia and devote time to the changes. I did plan on fixing them. And you may have fixed the article, but you did not re-write it, and much of the article is the product of my long, hard research and writing of the article. It is unethical of you to try to take credit for all of the article. Candy  o32  15:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And it is unethical for you to question my contributions to the article as not significant. YOU abandoned the initial review and even the reviewer points this out on the review page.. "I notified the nominator that the article was on hold. (S)he has made edits since then, but not in response to my review." And your list of contributions seem to indicate this, with edits made during the dates of 6 December 2011-8 December 2011. What policy says that if a user has not "re-written" the entire article, they are not eligible to nominate it for GA? I'm sorry but I think it's time for you to take responsibility for your own negligence of dismissing the first review. Till I Go Home (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I have never questioned your contributions to the article as not significant. I'm just saying my contributions to the article are still there! I'm saying that you didn't do anything to the article, you improved it. But I did as well. I know I did not follow-up on the review, but that does not mean I did not write the article. We both worked on the article for the nominated state that it is in today. Candy  o32  19:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't mind if you get credit for the article. But the edits I made actually took a very long time and if they weren't significant, it would be different. Till I Go Home (talk) 10:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course. I never tried to minimize your contributions. I had just said that I had contributed a lot to the article as well. Candy  o32  16:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Southgate, Sylvania
The difference between a "relist" and a "no consensus" close is that an NC means that the closing admin thinks even if we sit here and talk for another week, we can't come to a conclusion; in contrast, a "relist" merely says the discussion is overdue, and the closing admin isn't entirely convinced one way or another.

So here's the answer to your question: my indecisiveness. However, the discussion was already 3 days overdue when I relisted it, so you can equally blame the other tens of admins who handled AfD closures between 5 Feb and 8 Feb for not deleting the article. If the article really deserves to be deleted, we'll come to the same conclusion a week later, and that couldn't really hurt because the article's been around for almost 5 years already. Deryck C. 09:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited About a Girl (Sugababes song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louboutins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Liberty Walk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Who Says GA Review
I will be reviewing the article.  Toa   Nidhiki  05  19:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Sugababes
Hi, can I ask why you don't think Popjustice can be considered a reliable source? The website is edited by Peter Robinson, who's written and reported for the likes of The Guardian, NME, Time Out, Stylist etc.&mdash;see Peter Robinson (journalist). Extraordinary Machine (talk) 14:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually I think this would be more appropriate on Talk:Sugababes so I'll post it there. Extraordinary Machine (talk) 14:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, some more reports have come to light recently, I've not edited the article but your input on the talk page would be appreciated. Cheers. Extraordinary Machine (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Liberty Walk
Finally, |I reviewed it. Sorry for waiting this much. You can start fixing the issues. —  Tomica   (talk)   16:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you add done under every fixed issue? In that way I would be aware what was fixed and what no. —  Tomica   (talk)   11:28, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Congratulations. I passed the article. —  Tomica   (talk)   21:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks :)— Till I Go Home (talk) 22:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing "Do Ya Thang". I fixed most of the issues and explained on some of them. :) —  Tomica   (talk)   09:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Sample
I uploaded that Sugababes sample that you wanted. Hope it's OK.  S ' D ' 5  19:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much :D Till I Go Home (talk) 00:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ugly (Sugababes song)
The article Ugly (Sugababes song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ugly (Sugababes song) for things which need to be addressed. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 22:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * My Love Is Pink (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Digital download


 * No Can Do (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Madonna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey
Sorry I'll do it today. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 14:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks. Till I Go Home 16:37, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Roc Me Out
... believe I addressed most of the issues. Also put some responses to the queries :). —  Tomica   (talk)   15:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Boys Like You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to ARIA


 * Denial (Sugababes song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Change


 * Push the Button (Sugababes song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Electronic


 * Ugly (Sugababes song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Red Dress

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for the Heartbreak
Hi, about that article. I redirected the article to the album the song is on, as it doesn't satisfy the notability criteria. WP:SONG stipulates that a song which has not been released as a single should be redirected to the relevant article, which is what I did. I meant no offence, but please don't revert again. If you have further questions, just let know. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 15:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm already familiar with the criteria for songs-- however I do have information for the song in reliable sources so that I can expand it, meaning that it would also pass the GNG and thus be eligible for inclusion. THanks. Till I Go Home (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if the article was pages long and full of verifiable information, that wouldn't make the subject any more notable. If you have information about the song you want to add, then the correct place to do this is the Sweet 7 article. Try editing there instead? Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 15:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you should read the criteria, again. Till I Go Home (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Also taken directly from WP:SONG: Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notice how this song doesn't fulfil any of those criteria. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 15:36, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * READ THE ENTIRE CRITERIA. A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album. I'm trying to write the article and you keep reverting, so let me finish!. Till I Go Home (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I would suggest it is you who needs to read the entire criteria. But if you must, then go ahead. I'll take another look tomorrow, and if it would still be better off as a redirect then I'll revert and you can add the material to the album article. Fair enough? Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 15:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Fine. I've expanded the article but I'm NOT done yet-- off to bed. I'm going to try to look for more sources tomorrow. Till I Go Home (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia: Wikiproject Rihanna

 * Since you are fan of hers, and here and there edit Rihanna's articles. ;)

Merge proposal
A proposal was made to merge Justin Bieber on Twitter into the Justin Bieber article. As a regular contributor to the Justin Bieber article, your opinion would be appreciated. --LauraHale (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Wear My Kiss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Tie and Metro


 * Red Dress (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Bow Wow

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)