User talk:Tillmo

Welcome to the Wikipedia
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:


 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library

For more information click  here . You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.



Sam Spade 16:21, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Institutional model theory
I'm afraid I proposed it for deletion. The article only makes claims as to the usefullness of the (meta-)theory, without providing enough details for even an expert to verify, and the reference is to a 2006 journal article with limited peer review. Perhaps it should be merged into Institution (computer science) for the momemnt. I doubt the usefulness of that term, as well, but your sources seem to indicate it's been around for a while. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 16:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Imaginary relativity
I am confused about the Imaginary relativity article. If WSEAS is SPAM and not a valid scientific journal, why not remove the entire second paragraph?



This idea first was published “Journal WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMMUNICATIONS, Volume 9 Issue 2, February 2010” by Mehran Rezaei.

There are several other sources in the article, but none of them are inline citations. Are these reliable sources? If so, it would seem that inline citations could be created from at least some of them, and the no references tag could be removed. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I do not know if the other sources are reliable. Anyway, it seems that the article has been deleted in the meantime... --Tillmo (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, the article is still there. It seems to me that all the other sources are only background literature about relativity theory, but with no direct relation to imaginary relativity. Maybe we should move this discussion to the talk page of the article? --Tillmo (talk) 13:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * My suspicion is that either this is a hoax, or just an article by "Mehran Rezaei, Bachelor of Electronic Engineer, Esfahan Azad University, Shahinshahr, Isfahan, Iran" to promote a non-notable theory. In either case, I will tag the article appropriately. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I have asked for assistance on the Physics\Relativity page from someone who knows physics.--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Here is some info about WSEAS: Articles_for_deletion/Wseas, indicating that WSEAS publications are not notable. --Tillmo (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

WSEAS
Appearantly, some individual is trying to delete all my critical remarks about WSEAS. I will answer this with even more critical remarks. More info about the nature of WSEAS (including their aggressive practices) can be found here: --Tillmo (talk) 14:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/12/05/wseas-and-naun-two-publishers-and-conference-organizers-to-avoid/
 * http://wseas-mit.blogspot.de/2009/06/bogus-conference-organizers-bogus.html
 * http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/frers/blog/?p=998

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Oriented Point Relation Algebra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oriented Point Relation Algebra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oriented Point Relation Algebra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 19:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)