User talk:Tim!/Archive 20

Years in fashion
Hi Tim. Can you go through Template:Red carpet fashion and Category:Individual dresses (and sub categories) and create categories for each year in fashion e.g Category:2005 in fashion?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  22:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Can you create a Category:Years in fashion to link em all?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  15:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Can you split Category:Populated places in Sudan and Category:Populated places in South Sudan by state?

Music venues in England/in Buckinghamshire?
Whilst I can understand you changing The Stablesto 'in Buckinghamshire', I don't understand you changing the National Bowl, which is a national venue. You haven't given any reason for the change. Would you explain please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:22, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * On its web site it says "WELCOME to the Events section of the official website for The National Bowl, Milton Keynes, the UK's premier outdoor concert destination. " so maybe it should be in instead. Tim! (talk) 05:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Category: Draughts competitions
Hello Tim! There are two more pages for category, probably same for xiangqi, if you are satisfied your today's solution.

See Talk:Draughts at the 1st World Mind Sports Games where I can't resist sending you (and where I mis-spelled your surprising user name). --P64 (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism spree
Your hitherto rather subtle vandalism efforts over the years have very obviously been designed to go under the radar. Your brash efforts above the radar are clearly a last gasp. --Mais oui! (talk) 19:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:VANDAL and WP:KETTLE before accusing me of it. Tim! (talk) 20:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Bogus "removing supercats" edit summaries might be more convincing if you weren't regularly caught adding supercats, eg: The hypocrisy is truly staggering. --Mais oui! (talk) 20:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BP&diff=555091529&oldid=554977703
 * Any more personal attacks for me? Tim! (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * When you have just linked to WP:KETTLE, is it too much to expect that you might actually have read the linked page? Playing the offended innocent just won't wash with your horrific history. The lack of self-awareness is truly frightening.--Mais oui! (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Trolling for fellow edit warriors to help you break 3RR is profoundly unwise
3 or 4 years ago this might have worked. Unfortunately for you, and fortunately for the Wikipedia project, User:Owain seems to have matured and mellowed with age. You really ought to take a leaf out of his book. --Mais oui! (talk) 20:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You are failing to provoke me. Tim! (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Err... you have just prodded me with a shitty stick for several days, and somehow it is supposed to be me provoking you? Lord preserve us. --Mais oui! (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Honestly leave this user alone. The Grand Cenobite (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Pattern of disruptive behaviour: arbitrary removal or addition of supercategories at your own whim
This is precisely the type of behaviour which makes you such a disruptive User: In that bizarre edit you have simultaneously removed one supercat (Category:Chemical companies of England), but also, astonishingly, managed to actually add another supercat (Category:Wikipedia categories named after companies of the United Kingdom). And, as it standard with your editing, there is zero attempt to explain this inconsistent behaviour in the Edit summary. Combined with your penchant for rude and/or condescending edit summaries and your total failure to engage in dialogue, there is only one reasonable conclusion to draw. You are deep, deep into very difficult territory Tim!. I strongly advise you to read, extremely carefully, WP:INVOLVED, WP:HOUNDING, WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFY, and then to have a long, calm reflection upon your behaviour over the last few years. Just take your time and have a good long think about it. Hasty action and reaction will not serve you well in the long term.--Mais oui! (talk) 09:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Imperial_Chemical_Industries&curid=15176960&diff=555325578&oldid=555102913

User talk:Mais oui!
I have started a discussion at User talk:Mais oui! in an attempt to defuse this situation and get a better view of what exactly is happening here. Feel free to present your version of the facts there as well. If possible, it would perhaps be better if you would temporarily cease the actions Mais oui! is upset about (assuming you have any idea what these actions are); this doesn't mean that there is or isn't a problem with these actions, just that continuing them now will probably make any attempt to solve this peacefully a lot harder. Fram (talk) 09:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for taking the time to look into this issue, I have now responded at User talk:Mais oui! and agree to your suggestion of steering clear of the edits which are the locus of the dispute. Actually it took me so long to compose the reply that I am too tired to make any further edits to wikipedia tonight. Regards. Tim! (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)