User talk:TimTimBoBimBim

November 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 09:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Edit warring
Please do not engage in edit wars on Wikipedia, as they are harmful to all parties (see WP:EW). An editwar, especially one break the three-revert rule (WP:3RR) could lead to you being blocked from editing entirely. As and I have already pointed out, your added content is not supported by any sources, not even the ones you added. If you wish to have something insterted that is disputed by other editors, discuss with them, either on their talk pages, your talk page, or the article's talk page, but leep WP:STATUSQUO for the time-being. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 10:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Lordtobi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Right, of course and I are employees of Bethesda. That you're vandalising our user pages in response makes perfect sense now.  soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Is your disruptive editing, insertion of improperly sourced and unencyclopedic content, false claiming of being an administrator and experienced editor, user [talk] page vandalism, and constant removal of warnings also a product of Soetermans' and my employment at Bethesda? I wonder. P.S.: Your removal of Soetermans' comment concerning your unblock only adds to the preceding list. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 11:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)