User talk:Timdyson

Text 100
A tag has been placed on Text 100, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Leebo 86 23:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Text 100, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 23:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Bite Communications
A tag has been placed on Bite Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smoove Z 23:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Bite Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 23:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Next Fifteen Communications
A tag has been placed on Next Fifteen Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 23:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Please don't remove the speedy deletion tag when you add a hangon tag. Corvus cornix 00:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Bite Communications
A tag has been placed on Bite Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Butseriouslyfolks 01:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Text 100
I'm going to be honest, it's not easy to write neutral, non-promotional articles for large corporations. First of all, you need to cite some sources when you talk about the companies. It's not enough to just give their websites, because one of the standards for company notability is that the company has been the focus of multiple non-trivial written publications. There was no indication in any of the articles I saw that the companies met that standard. That's not to say that they don't, but the burden is on you as the one who wants to include the information to assert the notability. Verifiability is a core policy, and it's very difficult without sources cited. Most of the articles were deleted as advertising (especially the first I saw, which went so far as to use promotional, first-person language). However, Text 100 has been nominated for deletion (see the discussion here) mostly on the basis that notability has not been asserted. Leebo 86 04:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * When I say notability, I'm referring to the guidelines described here. There are guidelines on what makes something notable for most topics (music, people, software, etc.). Read the guidelines and assert in the article that they are satisfied by the company in question. Typically you can do this by citing the sources you have. Leebo 86 04:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. You're a CEO in the group of the corporations. In that case, I'm going to have to strongly recommend that you do not create or edit any more articles related to the company or group of companies, as this would constitute a conflict of interest. Wikipedia strives for neutrality, and it has been found on nearly every occasion that authors have great difficulty writing neutrally about subjects with which they have a close relationship. It is suggested that you wait until a neutral, independent third party decides to write the articles related to your companies. Leebo 86 05:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:N15.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:N15.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't remove AfD tags
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are however welcome to comment the deletion on the appropriate page. Leebo 86 19:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

No need for the hangon tag in AfD
It's a dicussion that will last for 5 days, there's no need to put a tag saying you're contesting it. Just argue your case and work on the article. The hangon tag is for contesting speedy deletion, which your article is no longer eligible for. Leebo</b> <sup style="color:#B22222;">86 20:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Text 100.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Text 100.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:N15.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:N15.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Text 100.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Text 100.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Next Fifteen Communications for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Fifteen Communications is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Next Fifteen Communications& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)