User talk:Timharper068

Nomination of Ryan Hobson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Hobson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan Hobson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk  00:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Gord Perks
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gord Perks, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Peggy Nash
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peggy Nash. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 00:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peggy Nash, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 01:05, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You have added accusations to articles of Toronto politicians, believed to be communists. Unfortunately, you don't back up those accusations with proper sources. That is a violation of the policy on biographical articles. Please add proper sources (including the names) or face the consequences of blocks. Night of the Big Wind  talk''  00:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Let me also warn you about the editwarring policy about 3 reverts (WP:3RR). At least on Gord Perks and Jack Layton you have now three reverts within 24 hours. More then 3 reverts within 24 hours is seen as editwarring and can lead to blocks. Please, don't let it come that far... Night of the Big Wind talk  00:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, that was your second revert on Peggy Nash and your fourth on Gord Perks. Face the music... Night of the Big Wind  talk  01:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
For violations of WP:3RR, you have been blocked from editing. Ground Zero | t 01:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, so as Night of the Big Wind has revised his/her comments from three reverts on Peggy Nash to two, I am hesitantly unblocking this account. I note, however, that this user is aggressively adding content that is only aimed at attacking left-wing members of Toronto Council in violation of WP:NPOV, and is skirting Wikipedia's 3RR. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. This sort of behaviour is not acceptable. Ground Zero | t 01:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid  ( Talk ) 13:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)