User talk:Timi422

Nomination of Abimbola Ogunnowo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abimbola Ogunnowo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abimbola Ogunnowo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Nigeria
Hello Timi, since you are involved with Nigerian articles, could you add your username to the participant list to keep abreast of information surrounding the WikiProject? Regards. HandsomeBoy (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * How do I, do that HandsomeBoy?--Timi422 (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Its very easy, follow this link then add your username to the participants list. You add your account by using the four tildes that is normally used to sign your posts. You seem to learn things quite fast, as your first article was very well written for a completely new editor. All things being equal, I am confident if you continue at that pace, you will be a huge asset to WikiProject Nigeria. Welcome to Wikipedia once again. HandsomeBoy (talk) 08:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Laura Ikeji for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Ikeji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laura Ikeji& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Abimbola Ogunnowo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abimbola Ogunnowo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abimbola Ogunnowo& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Kentalky (jockey)


A tag has been placed on DJ Kentalky (jockey), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The editor  whose username is Z0 13:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Z0 Please explain why the article was nominated for speedy deletion and also I just saw this Articles for deletion/Dj Kentalky an it was in 2016 when the article lack alot. This is 2018 and the article now meet Wikipedia guideline for WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO which it fails as of 2016. How can I apply or rather appeal for a restoration on the article recently deleted?

Please explain, am new here--Timi422 (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The article was nominated for speedy deletion because the new version was similar to the 2016 version, which was deleted via the AFD process. Maybe you could ask the admin who deleted the page for more information. The editor  whose username is Z0  11:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Odunsi (The Engine) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odunsi (The Engine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Odunsi (The Engine)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

SPI case opened
Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Timi422. HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note that this has been archived at Sockpuppet investigations/Oluwa2Chainz and the original case deleted. SpinningSpark 08:43, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock
I have checked around block request it's 1% chance getting your account back unless you got temporally blocked, so me submitting an appeal wouldn't change anything. Either they reply to your request, you don't understand the reasons you got blocked for and deny your request..


 * It doesn't seem like you understand the reason behind your block. To be clear, you were blocked because an administrator believes you're the same person as User:Obari2Kay. If that's true, you'll need to appeal from that account (and only after careful consideration). If it's not true, that's the first and biggest thing you need to address and convince us of here. Right now, whether the articles you contributed to met GNG or not, and similar content-related issues, is wholly irrelevant to any unblock. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 06:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I clearly understand the word sockpuppet Kevin and I understand they think am the same person that why am been disabled and blocked from editing, even on the investigation Risker made a statement as quoted "I note that there are a fair number of differences between the previously deleted articles and those versions created by User:Timi422" that to show you guy's am not whoever you mistaking me for, i also checked Obari2Kay and tracked it to Coal Press Nation Archive an saw mixing word's up was the main problem an that has always been the complained of User:Versace1608 as written on the talk page and I don't have same issues that is a more clear explanation.--Timi422 (talk) 09:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You said - "...even if few of my edit's had case of COI edits which was made some years ago due to they where case of WP:TOOSOON...", can you shed more light on this by explaining where you have COI connections? If you come out completely clean, disclosing the sock accounts, I'll intercede on your behalf to get unblocked as you've been civil in your discussions. HandsomeBoy (talk) 11:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * HandsomeBoy you clearly said "you continue to create/significantly contribute to topics that are targets of same set of COI editors!" that lead to me saying "even if few of my edit's had case of COI edits which was made some years ago" and as for the word "WP:TOOSOON" was pointing on the first AFD "DJ Kentalky", "Odunsi (The Engine)" got which was a clear state of WP:TOOSOON. Hope you get me clear, so you don't get confused.--Timi422 (talk) 21:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Please stop fighting with one another. Risker said that an admin with behavioral comparison experience should review the case and make a determination: I did, and I came to the belief that the evidence suggests you are this editor. I’ll be more than happy to show any reviewing admin this via email per WP:BEANS. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * That was a false claim that all am saying, you can't shut me out just like that and expect me to accept being a sockpuppet of someone I never knew exited if not for the investigation that was opened would never had come across such name "Obari2Kay". It not my fault the article was deleted and the editor was disabled and blocked, the only thing we have or had in common is we both got interested in creating same article. No sockpuppet business and no eligible prove that show's am a sockpuppet so I don't understand how you carried out your behavioral comparison TonyBallioni please explain further.--Timi422 (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Also as for HandsomeBoy I have a strong believe the reason for the investigation was to remove my vote from Odunsi (The Engine) as a blocked sock which can only be achieved by opening an investigation and making me look like a sockpuppet to achieve an SPI Case. All I have to say is what main to stay on Wikipedia would stay with or without me contributing as long as it met the necessary criteria which we both know. Also for the unblock request when is this going to be reviewed?.--Timi422 (talk) 15:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Could you email me your analysis, please? Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 20:37, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ygm. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:42, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * As above, I will email any admin the diffs that led me to block and I emailed Kevin, but I stand by this block and I won’t be explaining to an exceptionally deceptive sockmaster how I made the decision to block. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * For the avoidance of doubt, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia on any account or IP address – even if, as you assert, this is your only account, the block is still valid against you as a person until an appeal is successful, and any new account you create would be a violation of policy. I would suggest that any administrator who affirms the block on review of this block appeal also revoke talk page access. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 07:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I’ve gone ahead and revoked it as their last edit was essentially taunting the blocking and last reviewing admin. Offer above still stands to email any diffs for the outstanding unblock and any WP:UTRS appeal. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to take a look over your evidence, so please feel free to send me an email. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:45, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Kentalky (November 4)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:DJ_Kentalky Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Frayae was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

&mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)