User talk:Timmaliyil

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Haakon (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Articles for deletion nomination of Alertboot
I have nominated Alertboot, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Alertboot. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Haakon (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Haakon. Not sure where I'm supposed to post my responses for the discussion.  Looks like in 3 different places?  I was planning on editing the article more this week.  Apparently, my starting point isn't so great.  You have questions about the notability of the software.  How can I assist here?  I initially tried to mirror what Alertsec (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alertsec_Xpress) did in their article.  (And I know I'm discouraged from referencing other articles when discussing this article.)

So, what are your suggestions? I've read the rules, but I'd appreciate your guidance about how to proceed. Thanks - Tim Timmaliyil (talk) 08:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * There is really only one approach, which is to add references to places where the product has received significant third-party coverage from reliable sources as described in the general notability guideline. I have attempted to find such coverage, but came up empty. Haakon (talk) 08:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies, but that's still a little vague. What constitutes "significant coverage"?  I've added a link from another company who references us. Should I include third-party references/reviews to Sophos here?  Again, I hate to say it and I'm sure you hate to hear it, but that previously mentioned article/company offers comparable notability and references.  Yes, I know you're looking at this article independently, but since they're the Coke to our Pepsi, it's a worthy comparison for notability.  Thanks for the help so far. Tim Timmaliyil (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Significant coverage is defined by WP:GNG as: "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material. As per the same guideline, coverage has to be reliable and independent. The other article you reference is really no better, and I've taken the time to nominate it for deletion. You should not use our encyclopedia to battle for marketshare; as president of the company you should not edit Wikipedia on any matters relating directly to your company at all, as you have a very significant conflict of interest. Haakon (talk) 09:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alertboot


A tag has been placed on Alertboot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Alertboot and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Codf1977 (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)