User talk:Timmytooltime

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Graham87 (talk) 03:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious. You've just been padding your edit count with edits that range from the reasonable to the ridiculous. You are not welcome here. Graham87 (talk) 03:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I’m not sure how you can say what I’ve edited is suspicious.
 * Today I edited the Jonjo Shelvey page… it showed in each individual competition he hadn’t played a game for Nottingham Forest this season, but the total number of games this season for that club amounted to 8 games so I edited it to say 0 games which 0+0+0 does equal.
 * From the Linden page I removed outdated census information from over a decade ago.
 * For the Redheap page I added the fact that a street in Faulconbridge near the authors, Norman Lindsay, property had been named after the novel… e.g. Redheap Rd. I then noticed I had missed a comma in my edit so I fixed that up.
 * How is any of this suspicious or ridiculous? Timmytooltime (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You removed information about Indigenous people and slavery from various pages saying it was "superfluous". That is ... more than a little bizarre, to say the least. And there's Draft:Greensta One, which is in no way notable enough for Wikipedia and for which you probably have a conflict of interest. Graham87 (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The outdated census information I removed was on one particular racial group when no other races are mentioned. I would have thought Wikipedia would seek to avoid picking and choosing which races to detail, including information on all or none.
 * As for your comment on Greensta One, whether it is notable enough for Wikipedia is open to debate, but accusations of conflict of interest are based on what, the fact that I live in the same area as them and wished to expose an up and coming artist.
 * I also see you have removed correct information about a Local suburb. Is it in the best interests of Wikipedia to include incorrect information on their site and to remove information from their site simply because you aren’t aware of it. The vast majority of information on Wikipedia is not referenced, just because you don’t have the local knowledge, doesn’t make it irrelevant.
 * Perhaps rather than banning people and making unfounded accusations, you should reach out to contributors who have made edits that you disagree with and discuss your concerns in a constructive, respectful and professional manner. Timmytooltime (talk) 07:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Greensta One
Hello, Timmytooltime. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greensta One, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Greensta One


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Greensta One, a page that you created, has been deleted. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
 * It appeared to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)