User talk:Timostaurus

Proposed deletion of Scott Wornow
Hello, Timostaurus. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Scott Wornow, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Scott Wornow to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ♦ Tentinator ♦  22:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Wornow


A tag has been placed on Scott Wornow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Frmatt (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timo Ti
Sorry, but that's just not how we roll; jokes and nonsense are fine, but not when they're in the space reserved for real articles. I've nominated your page for speedy deletion as a hoax; you can contest the deletion at the talk page here, but it's probably better to just let it go. No worries, these things happen; we just like to keep at least a little bit of decorum here. Happy editing! 68.48.34.96 (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 01:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Walnut Creek, California has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Walnut Creek, California was changed by Timostaurus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965922 on 2013-09-10T03:46:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Wornow


A tag has been placed on David Wornow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dudel250 (talk) 03:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)