User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2014/8

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:07, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Sunday August 17: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Request for arbitration
Hi Timothy, would it be possible for you to arbitrate on this issue?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shudra#Scholarly_referenced_content_on_this_page_is_being_removed.

As you can see here I have made repeated requests to the editor not to use the offensive word "untouchable" to describe Bhim Rao Ambedkar, the man who drafted the Indian Constitution. The use of the derogatory and racist word -- which has no relevance to the article -- has been rationalized with some incredible "racist" logic. Also, every statement I have made in the article is backed by research evidence, some of which I had provided in the citation to the article, and some of which I have provided on the Talk:Shudra. But instead of discussing my edit my version has been repeatedly reverted and I have been given a 3 revert warning. Since I have taken the discussion to its logical conclusion it would be nice if the arbitrator could come in and resolve the matter.

This was my edit, with citations and hyperlinks, which was reverted to a "racist" and "biased" stub with no citations. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shudra&diff=next&oldid=621626375

I had posted this issue on the dispute resolution board (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Shudra) but the other editor had it closed saying, perhaps correctly, that dispute resolution, at that stage, was premature. I have tired to post there again but since my summary of dispute didn't show up after saving the page I thought I would ask you. If this dispute doesn't come under your purview I would appreciate it if you could guide me to the right place. Thanks. -Spark121212 (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)