User talk:Timothy Robinson12345/Archives/2016/December

Your RfA
Hello T.R. Have you thoroughly read Advice for RfA candidates? If so, could you reconsider the RfA and please request deletion of it per G7? Thanks, Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Adminship
It is true that we need more admins here, and I hope that you are able to attain this position in the fullness of time. You have at present only 315 edits under your belt, over a two-month period; I do note your comment in your aborted RfA regarding previous anonymous edits. There is no fixed rule here, and editors do set themselves varying barriers for acceptance or rejection of admin requests. Broadly speaking the community here likes to see a minimum of three thousand good quality edits, ideally manual ones, and at least one year's experience. A sizeable number of editors look for five thousand edits - it is an area where individual preferences can be demonstrated. A clean block log with no serious historical conflicts is good but not obligatory. When you re-apply it is fair to mention your IP editing, but I have to say that it will not carry much weight. And I suggest that you read through some RfA applications to get an idea of the correct way to make your request when the time comes. Happy wikying. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice it is much appreciated --Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 13:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

inappropriate edit
Your edit here was entirely inappropriate. Please don't attack or bite new users in this manner. Theroadislong (talk) 13:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Just to add onto this, this is an internet website and we don't know what is said on here is true. That user might or might not be a lieutenant in some country's military forces.  The username is in compliance with our Username policy so we shouldn't be asking them to change their name.  On the same token, we don't know you are a 2LT in the USAF, we have you saying you are, but that doesn't prove anything.  I didn't know there was a 16th Air Wing in the USAF today.  There used to be a 16th Air Expeditionary Wing based out of Aviano but that was deactivated in 2003 and the 401st Air Expeditionary Wing took its place.  Where is the 16th Air Wing assigned?  - GB fan 14:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I used to be in the 16th air wing but when it was deactivated I moved to Massachusetts and joined the 102nd NWS--Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I took this "I am a U.S Air Force second Lt in the 16th air wing" to mean you are currently in the 16th Sir Wing, since you said you are a 2LT in the unit.  So did you do what you were accusing LieutenantJames22 II of doing, faking what you actually are?  - GB fan 14:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I am it was just improper context I forgot to make it plural--Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You are what? You should have made what plural?  That sentence is very confusing.  (also you do not have to leave a talk back on my talk page.)  - GB fan 14:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

wow I am an idiot lol --Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you are talking about, you say you are a 2LT in the 16th Air Wing. Then say you left the unit when it was deactivated 13 years ago and moved to Massachusetts and joined the 102d NWS (part of the Rhode Island National Guard). If you are still a 2LT that is a long time to get promoted.  - GB fan 14:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * First of all, let me make it clear both to you and to any talk-page stalkers showing interest that you are under no obligation to reveal any personal data of any kind here. Having said that, if you wish to clarify your serving status in the US forces, which is stated somewhat ambiguously, it may satisfy other users to whom this appears to be important; it is not important to me. If you wish to make no factual resonse here, you are wholly entitled to do to. And GB fan, please note that you are not allowed to seek any kind of personal information here. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , I didn't ask for any personal info. He stated that he was a 2LT in the USAF and part of the 16th AW.  I thought the 16th AW was deactivated.  All I asked was where the 16th AW was based.  That is not personal info.  Everything else he volunteered on his own.  I didn't want any personal info from him, I was talking to him about what he put out on Wikipedia on his own accord.  - GB fan 16:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess you could have been talking about this question, "So did you do what you were accusing LieutenantJames22 II of doing, faking what you actually are?" That was probably the wrong question to ask, I was just making a point not really asking if what he said was true.  - GB fan 16:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Dooars Animal Savers Organization
Since you declined the speedy deletion on this article (without an edit summary -- poor form for someone seeking the mop), I've taken the article to AFD. Please feel free to make your feelings known at WP:Articles for deletion/Dooars Animal Savers Organization. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The speedy deletion of this article has not been declined; only an admin can do that. The speedy tag has been removed, which is wholly different. Had it been admin-declined then replacement of the speedy tag would not be allowed;it would be entirely proper here for the tag to be replaced, or if you wish you can let the AfD, which I anticipate would come to a "delete" decision, to proceed. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Per WP:Deletion policy, once a page has been speedily deleted, and another editor has objected to the speedy deletion by removing the template, there exists the assumption that the page does not ambiguously meet the speedy deletion criteria and therefore a deletion discussion is required. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)