User talk:Timsar81

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Ghobad
A tag has been placed on Ghobad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RobJ1981 08:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. RobJ1981 08:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .
 * I have deleted Ghobad because it gave insufficient context (CSD A1) and did not reasonably assert notability (CSD A7). If this is a mythological character, there should be reliable sources naming him and describing his role in mythology. If those sources are cited, and the article can be properly written to describe the subject, the article may be recreated. Kafziel Talk 14:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have now redirected the Ghobad article to the Shahnameh article. I have done the same with the articles on Ghaaran and Sarv. Please take a look at the other articles linked to from List of Shahnameh characters to see what is expected. Thanks! Kafziel Talk 15:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)