User talk:Timsheridan

Hello! Welcome to my talk page. Please leave messages here, I will read them eventually.

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * Read the tutorial and learn how to edit a page.
 * Experiment in the sandbox.
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset.
 * Try to edit from a neutral point of view.
 * Use talk pages to communicate with other editors.
 * Be bold in updating pages.
 * Eventually, read the Manual of Style and learn about the Five Pillars of Wikipedia.
 * And most importantly, have fun!

If you need any help, see the help pages and glossary, add a question to the help desk, or ask me on my talk page.

I hope you will enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Good luck! — Bcat

Owned. I phjeer.
0wned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.75.124 (talk • contribs)
 * I got owned!?!? I'm phj33ring! - Timsheridan 14:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

wikEd


Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus:• syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • morefixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages• convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjustthe font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Usually it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 21:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Digital DawgPound
Digital DawgPound, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Digital DawgPound satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Digital DawgPound and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Digital DawgPound during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --- tqbf 17:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Radio FreeK America
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Radio FreeK America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Radio FreeK America. --- tqbf 22:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Binary Revolution Radio
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Binary Revolution Radio, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rtphokie (talk) 10:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Binary Revolution Radio
I have nominated Binary Revolution Radio, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Binary Revolution Radio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 13:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Birth Certificate
Since you linked to the article birth certificate, I would suggest you actually read that article. By the second sentence you should realize that you are, in fact, incorrect. What Hawaii calls a "certification of live birth" is what is commonly known as a birth certificate (just as a Driver's License often says "License to operate a motor vehicle" or something similar, but is still what we call a driver's license). Further, the change you are attempting to make goes against the already established consensus on that page. Rather than edit-warring, you may want to discuss it first, but any questions or objections you raise will likely have already been answered in the talk archives. --Loonymonkey (talk) 01:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Also, when you claimed that it isn't his "birth certificate proper" because of the wording on the title, then you apparently are claiming that nobody from Hawaii (or the 20 or so other states that use variations of that wording) actually has a "birth certificate proper." Clearly, that's preposterous. Your reasons for this edit are suspect, seeming to have more to do with pushing debunked fringe conspiracy theories and less to do with accuracy. --Loonymonkey (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Loonymonkey (talk) 01:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monster Player Kill


The article Monster Player Kill has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for reference found a single published (gBooks) WP:RS mention in Geektionary: From Anime to Zettabyte, an A to Z Guide to All Things Geek, Adams Media, 2011 . Given the 2011 publication date it could well be sourced from this long unreferenced article. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)