User talk:Timsj

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:


 * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try How to edit a page.
 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use 	 ~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes).
 * You can experiment in the test area.
 * You can get help at the Help Desk
 * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Neutral point of view, Civility, What Wikipedia is not
 * If you made IP edits before creating a user account, you can attribute your IP edits to your account at Changing attribution for an edit.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop a note at New user log.

-- Utcursch | Talk to me

C. S. Lewis
Hi. Wikipedia has an article on C. S. Lewis. It seems that you created an article called C.S.Lewis (note there are no spaces after periods), so probably, it was speedy deleted. utcursch | talk 07:47, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)


 * I've made this a redirect. 66.92.237.111 19:32, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Jesuit Alumni
Hi I've put something on the articles Talk Page. You're right. My previous move was not really satisfactory.

JASpencer 17:39, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Religion in the United Kingdom
Thanks for the comment. It seemed to me that perhaps the role of Henry VIII of England was overstressed in an article about Religion in the United Kingdom - his influence in Scotland, for example, being less than crucial. Further, there is a question as to the extent to which Henry led the demands for reform of the Church (remembering that he was Fidei defensor) or finally climbed on a long-rolling bandwagon for dynastic and political reasons. I'd leave the wording fairly neutral so the reader may refer to articles such as History of the Church of England. Man vyi 15:06, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Roy evans.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roy evans.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. -- SCEhard T 23:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Copyright
Your original version of the Ceiriog Valley article contained a lot of material lifted from http://www.ceiriog.com/, with no assertion of permission. After removing some of it as being biased (which is OK on its original site, but not on wikipedia) I have rephrased the rest. Please don't insert copyrighted material into articles. Thanks. Arbitrary username 11:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Vatican2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vatican2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vatican2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vatican2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Stpauls jarrow.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Stpauls jarrow.jpg, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SteveMcCluskey (talk) 19:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Benedict_biscop.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Benedict_biscop.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Edmund Campion
Hello, Timsj. Is the following information from Waugh's biography of Campion? Someone is requesting a citation. Thanks. "By the time the Queen had left Oxford Campion had earned the patronage of the powerful William Cecil and also the Earl of Leicester, tipped by some to be future husband of the young Queen. People were now talking of Campion in terms of being a future Archbishop of Canterbury." --  Kenatipo   speak! 19:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Holy Name, Manchester
Hi Tim, great to see you on Wiki. I wanted to update the Holy Name liturgy section as it is probably out of date. Do you think it still needs changing? Also, do you know where we can find references for the Construction section? It has almost no citations. Best wishes with everything, Peter nSJ. Pjposullivan (talk) 22:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mamadou Sakho, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)