User talk:Timstickley

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:WBR 06 Swansea.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:WBR 06 Swansea.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 21:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Dave, I'm having a few problems with uploading pictures - I keep recieving messages saying I haven't properly sourced or copyrighted my pictures - I think I may have had some from other people too. They are created by me with my digital camera, and I don't know how to edit them for sourcing/copyrighting now I've uploaded them. I also don't know what to put once I CAN edit them for sourcing/copyrighting! I'm new to this - can you help please?! Thanks, User:Timstickley


 * The license tag you've added now is fine - that's the main thing that was needed. For completeness, I would recommend adding an explicit statement to the effect of "I created this photo myself" to the image page; it's not absolutely necessary right now, but if someone transfers it to Commons (to include it in other wikipedias), that can become a bureacratic sticking point.  Also useful, if you want to take the time, would be to use the Information template, to organize the details.  --dave pape (talk) 05:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

SURC
Hi Tim. I noticed that you had a spot of trouble with this page. The trick is to convert the redirect, which can only have one target, into a disambiguation page. I have done so and believe it does the job. Favonian (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Superb - you're a hero, thanks! Are you an editor? If so, I'm having a few problems with uploading pictures - I keep recieving messages saying I haven't properly sourced or copyrighted my pictures. They are created by me with my digital camera, and I don't know how to edit them for sourcing/copyrighting now I've uploaded them... Cheers anyway! Tim


 * I blush :) As for the title: we are all editors, but I'm not an administrator, so I don't have any special privileges.  Regarding the image issue I'm woefully (or blessedly) lacking in experience.  I can see that you added a licensing tag to the image about which you had received an admonishing message.  If you want to be on the safe side, you should probably ask the editor who left you the message.  Favonian (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Me again. Couldn't help noticing that you left your the message for Dave on your own talk page.  It's probably better to leave it on User talk:Davepape.  That way, the next time he accesses a Wikipedia page, a bright orange banner will notify him about the message.  Favonian (talk) 23:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * When you upload a page use the "own work" option. Then there is a licencing scroll down menu which you have to use to avoid the rude messages. It is best to select the option that is recommended - cant remember which it is but it is obvious. For the ones already loaded, just go in to edit the picture and copy in the bit in sqiggly brackets that the message suggested. If you plan to add lots of pictures, you may want to load them onto Wikipedia Commons so they can be used on other language versions. Apart from the hassle of switching into commons, which can be done via the main page, it is exactly the same process.  Good luck Motmit (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to wikipedia!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Tomahawk (snowboarding trick)
Please reference your articles. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 06:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tomahawk (snowboarding trick)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tomahawk (snowboarding trick). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Tomahawk (snowboarding trick). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumpstart (drink)


A tag has been placed on Jumpstart (drink), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 01:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumpstart (drink)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jumpstart (drink), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. John from Idegon (talk) 01:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Moyles Court School moved to draftspace
Howdy - I see you are in the process of expanding this, but I would suggest doing so in draftspace. If an article that is so unfinished and undersourced is in mainspace, the likelihood that someone will take issue with it is very substantial. Please do move this back into mainspace once there are at least sufficient refs to demonstrate notability; you may want to have a look at this guideline. Cheers -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Timstickley. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Moyles Court School, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. per:,  A S U K I T E   17:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)