User talk:Timur narkuziev

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Efficiency science) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — T aggard  ( Complain ) 22:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Obvously, besides such laws as gravitation and relativity there are other laws that are frequently are not thought of while they DEFINE everything icluding the very gravitation itself and are manifested in all systems and processes be it in physics, biology, chemistry, psychology, lingustics, art... This is the EFFICIENCY LAW(S). It's not very clear though what criteria define EFFICIENCY as such. A supposition can be made that anything that exists is efficient as long as it exists, and once inefficient it quits existing as the world removes it (at least removes it from being manifested in the material world). So in a way, the nature (subject) changes its' "shape" thus requiring every ting in it (its objects like human etc) to either fit into this change or die. If so, we can say that one (being, thing or process) can be efficient only because there is an existing CONTEXT within which an object exists (in this case we call this context - nature). Then we face a new question: in what context does the nature exist as an object? If human perception is the ultimate-END/final-sub-context which the nature (hyper-context) forms and impacts and where it (probably?) ends in a way, then another question is: what would be a hyper context for nature? And if take further... what is the very beginning, the super-context that shapes it ALL? And what are his/its' criteria?

Also, how is it possible that nature so obviously striving for efficiency would create HUMAN, a creature of endless desires, which is so inefficient?

How does efficiency interplay with endless desires?

Does efficiency have any negative sides or is it synonym of perfection?