User talk:Tinaiyer1976

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:EKhichdi.com (June 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SuperHamster&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 17:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Kirin13 (talk) 03:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at User talk:Rameshnta909. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''WP:BLP applies on talk pages too. Please refrain from denigrating any living person.'' Neil N  talk to me 18:45, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Maria_Sharapova. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. here and here  NQ    talk  21:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

So naïve. It is me who is threatened with all this policies but does not that same applied to you all as well? All I am doing is trying to make you ppl understand that the content need be to be impactful and now useless. Which is the case with Maria controversy. And yes please if you want to block go ahead and block me!--Tinaiyer1976 (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop before you're blocked
Hello, Tinaiyer. You're not going to get your content included in Maria Sharapova by repetition and attrition, because there's consensus not to include it. Please stop beating a dead horse on Talk:Maria Sharapova and stop insulting people, or I will block you for tendentious editing and disruption. You're not allowed to bloat up the talkpage with endless reruns of the same argument, and you're also not allowed to attack article subjects nor other editors. Also, I see you have recently attempted to push your agenda by a trolling request on Talk:Sachin Tendulkar, based on a misunderstanding, whether deliberate or not, of NeilN's argument. Just stop. I see you invite admins to block you if they want to, but I thought I'd give you a final warning first. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC).


 * Please go ahead and block me of that the decdsion you all have made on so called free speech platform. I stand by my views even if that requires you blocking me. Please let me know what you need from my end for you to block me--Tinaiyer1976 (talk) 14:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * What free speech platform is that? Wikipedia is not a vehicle for free speech, it's a private website. It's an online encyclopedia, not an internet forum. All I need from your end to block you is that you continue to misuse the site to push your agenda and to bloat up discussion pages with repetitiousness and trolling. Checking… all right, I see you have continued in the same vein. OK, you have been blocked indefinitely for wasting too much time, per my final warning above. Note: I'm not sure if you edit in good faith and simply don't understand our policies and principles, or if you're deliberately flouting them. It doesn't actually make any difference to the end result. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:53, 5 July 2014 (UTC).

Private website of some administrator!!! --Tinaiyer1976 (talk) 17:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * You're not allowed to create new accounts to edit, either. They will simply be blocked per WP:DUCK. The block applies to the individual, not a particular account. If you try to evade your block again, you'll simply ensure that you'll never be allowed to edit this site. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC).


 * And technically, yes, Wikipedia is the private website of the Wikimedia Foundation. They're pretty liberal with who they let use the site, though, as long as they follow the rules. The community of users is generally left to enforce the rules, and as you've noticed, the community will block users who persistently break the rules. —C.Fred (talk) 13:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)