User talk:Tinia flab

March 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Many teams have not won the Stanley Cup so placing it in the article isn't needed. Yosemiter (talk) 02:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Information_orange.svg @Yosemiter Hello. I was unaware that we were in the business of removing basic, widely-known facts from the website. If the purpose of the website has changed from education, then please accept my sincerest apologies for this egregious transgression.  Thank you for your use of a stock response template on my talk page. Tinia flab 01:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It is not a serious transgression. It is just far more notable when a team wins an award (any award) than to list when a team doesn't win. The only way that it would probably be notable would be if the team was one or two of the only teams to have never won it and there were secondary sources covering that fact. But in reality, 12 of the 30 current teams have not won the Stanley Cup (probably making the Blues the only current notable non-winner since they have been around the longest without winning, but the notability is the duration not the fact that they don't have a championship). Also the info box clearly shows when teams have won the Cup so by inference, it also says when teams have not. Yosemiter (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)