User talk:Tinkero

Welcome!

 * }

Anonymous
Dear Mr Tinkero. Please remember to sign all your comments to talk pages or user pages using four tildes, like this ~. I don't think Mr Reedy is attempting to "destroy" the page on the film Anonymous. Please read the relevant policy pages to get a clearer idea of the protocols within which we work: WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:V. There are also specific rules relating to the Shakespeare authorship pages. I have added links above. Paul B (talk) 12:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Well. Mr Orloff, you can of course add your response to Shapiro if it is reliably sourced. I didn't see where it was sourced to, but if you just say you are Mr Orloff we can't simply accept your word. Even a reply on a blog would be insufficient, since anyone can claim to be you. This is for your own protection. It would have to be published in a reliable newspaper or other outlet which has fact-checking. As for the "blank verse" issue, though it is true that the acting troupe do add a comment that some bits are not in verse, the whole scene presents the claim that writing a play entirely in blank verse is something amazing and unprecedented, when in fact it was utterly commonplace. So we have to distinguish between what are minor and major issues of accuracy here. BTW, I am an academic with a special interest in this topic. I will be giving a public lecture on your film and the history of "Prince Tudor" theory next month. Paul B (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

You have to follow wikipedia rules. I am merely informing you of them and making some specific comments about a particular point that came up. Where have your views on PT theory been published? Paul B (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the information. Paul B (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

A topic of interest to you is covered by discretionary sanctions under an Arbcom case
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Shakespeare authorship question if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question. Tom Reedy (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

You were mentioned
|here. Follow the link. Smatprt (talk) 03:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Those 30,000 images
Regarding those 30,000 pictures of every Tudor building they could find that were scanned into a computer: what is the plan for those? That would be a tremendous resource for scholars, and if they were donated to a prestigious university it would piss a lot of academics off, which I would pay to see for the amusement purposes alone. (Of course, what would be even better would be to donate them to Wikimedia Commons, but then I'm prejudiced.) Tom Reedy (talk) 14:23, 16 November 2011 (UTC)