User talk:Tinsman

Bernard Cohen
When I did a rather superficial polish of this page I couldn't determine where the balance lies between Cohen's claims and the rebuttals of Puskin, Smith and Field. I see that you have reverted from they "argued" to they "demonstrated" that Cohen is wrong. It seems that you have done better than I in tracing this source: would you consider citing it in the article? Best --Moonraker88 10:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. I'm going to format them as footnotes, just for consistency through the article. Regards. --Moonraker88 06:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

African American
Hi. I just wanted you to know that I removed your edits concerning the University of Iowa from African American. In general, it is considered inappropriate to promote a school, business, or organization on Wikipedia. (See, for instance, WP:NOT.) I realize you probably didn't know this — no harm, no foul.

You're adding some great information to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy being part of the project! --Wayne Miller 17:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: It is a duplicate of NIOSH which is a far more comprehensive article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Radon Good Article review
If you've got time, could you please help resolve the issues at Talk:Radon/GA2 – especially the issues regarding references, because I am not as familiar with the article as you are. Thanks in advance! Gary King ( talk ) 05:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to R. William Field has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to R. William Field constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to R. William Field. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Proposed deletion of Daniel J. Steck


The article Daniel J. Steck has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable, advert

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 207.69.137.24 (talk) 02:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tinsman! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Dan Krewski -

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles F. Lynch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles F. Lynch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charles F. Lynch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)