User talk:Tintin1107/Archive17

Orkut
My Question on orkut is 5 days older now. You are the only person who looks like to answer. Please proceed Sir ! Bharath628 (talk) 07:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

look like the Turtle had fell into the sea :P, Rule 3 it sir! ;-) Bharath628 (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Please change this (remove the sentence the highest for any player finishing on the losing side). Robin Smith's record have been over took by Matthew hayden :-) Bharath628 (talk) 13:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

The page is also not showing your archives. Here it is and do tell me what went wrong! Bharath628 (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Back to chennai then???????Bharath628 (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Why Not Online On Orkut??, i'll keep a Question ready :-) check the community after 10 minutes :-) Bharath628 (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

i am a active member :-)))))))) LOLzzzzz Bharath628 (talk) 08:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC) Replied to mailBharath628 (talk) 10:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Have left another mail for you sir, please reply as quick as you can Bharath628 (talk) 16:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Your reply didn't helped at all, can you give me a exact name please. . . . ?Bharath628 (talk) 06:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

i tried your link and also this, but nothing worked Bharath628 (talk) 06:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

will like to join again. . .?  :-) Bharath (talk) 06:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Thanks Bharath (talk) 06:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Tintin saab, you have a mail Bharath (talk) 13:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Good day SirBharath (talk) 08:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Louis Hall
I am familiar with the Hawke anecdote, but it is not the source of the trivia in question. I shall make the necessary changes immediately I find it. Kindest, Robertson-Glasgow (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Patsy Hendren
I hadn't heard that he coached South Australia. It sounds unlikely on the face of it, but the source seems reliable. JH (talk page) 17:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Thanks for the thing about the Mumbai PC guy. I don't think he is notable enough since he wasn't a former FC cricketer -was he?  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 02:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

12th man
Is there any rule that the 12th man has to be male. Just wondering. It would have been amusing to have SRK and PZ out there fielding in the IPL. lol.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 01:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Bradman poll
Hey, it'd be good to have your input there too, esp if you do agree. As I suspect this will be one of those PEREN arguments and it'll be helpful to have overwhelming consensus to point to. Not that that'll stop 'em. I'm thinking Bill O'Reilly and requested page moves --Dweller (talk) 10:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Cookie
You said me not to award you a barnstar, well atleast i can give you this! Thank you for all your help :-) Bharath628 (talk) 13:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Can we add First-class Cricket's Anniversaries here. . . .? I am Good at this--Bharath628 (talk) 17:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Can i/Should i ????--Bharath628 (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

No Sir here, i have another Good Reason to use Tintin sir instead of Tintin, But i can't Write here :-((( --Bharath628 (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

See This, How On earth did Sandeep Patil scored 15 Runs in 1 ball and got out LBW while facing the same ball ???? --Bharath628 (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

You haven't Replied me for last 2 Qs :-(((((((((((((((((((((((((( Bharath628 (talk) 10:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Please read your e-mail sir. Bharath628 (talk) 17:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Phew! I was worried, i thought you left this wikipedia world Bharath628 (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Since you didn't reply me, i asked this here and got my answer :-) Bharath628 (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that Orkut answer, Mr.Richard will be suprised to know that there are two such incidents ! Bharath628 (talk) 16:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Are you this person or are you using your tintin pro for orkut. . . ?Bharath628 (talk) 16:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, Sir!Bharath628 (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Good Morning Sir, today is 18 june. The 264th anniversary of first class cricket !, Miracle #1, The first ever First class match is played. Kent beats England by 1 wicket http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Scorecards/0/1.html Bharath628 (talk) 06:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

You always use the Word Later, but that "later" never comes (the mail for an Example) :-( Bharath628 (talk) 07:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

"Irritate"
Your kind of irritation I can always handle. --Dweller (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello sir, Guess who am i. . ? ;-) :P ==)) Bharathtintin (talk) 14:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * If that's addressed to me, I've not a clue. --Dweller (talk) 15:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Nah, it is Bharath628's earlier incarnation :-) Tintin 03:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Caught :-(((, Sorry Mr.Dweller for the Confusion, But i hope you agree that Irritating Tintin is a Good Thing to do after all, "ROFL" :P Bharath628 (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Tintin sir, are you online??? Need help :-( Bharath (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tintin sir, Check your mail :( Bharath (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you tell?Bharath (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes i know :-(( Bharath (talk) 12:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Didn't receive my mail ??Bharath (talk) 06:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the last Email, BTW i am Not Red anymore Bharath (talk) 08:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

re : retired out
i got your idea and it's clear now. but there should be a reference to it. right? people who haven't seen the dismissal would be misunderstood.thanks a lot.Chanakal 06:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Agreed about Hobbs. JH (talk page) 09:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

all right pals your moves clear to me now.check this out Radella Cricket Grounds tell is there any thing to edit.Chankal 11:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Ian Johnson
Thank you very much for this edit. I would never have thought to look for links. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 07:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I am Blocked :(
Someone has Blocked the whole Opera mini Browser, as you know even i use my Mobile-Opera for editing. can you please help? Bharath628 (talk) 17:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you sir, i have asked them for Help, Did you keep me in your watchlist? Bharath (talk) 17:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * In south africa, the pitch curator was awarded "man of the match" in one of the match. I Can't remember the Details, any Idea Which match?? Bharath (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Surprised, You used Cricinfo Instead of CricketArchive :-O Bharath (talk) 17:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * @This Edit, Believe it or Not, i once wasted 2 Hours to find such match in CricketArchive, But i didn't find :( Bharath (talk) 10:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * WOW, How on earth can You Like those Boring Movies? :P--Bharath (talk) 10:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You must Create an article on Bradman Ediriweera (Cricketarchive says bradman whereas Cricinfo says bradmon), played 99 first class matches, deserve an article Bharath (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * i am Not Good at Creating, who do you think i am ? Dakshinamoorthy Swami? --Bharath (talk) 16:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * DoneBharath (talk) 11:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Errm, Help Bharath (talk) 10:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * and again Bharath (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Check you mailBharath (talk) 15:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * New Gmail, kindly check Bharath (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed that CN tag Bharath (talk) 08:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * When will you come back ? :( Bharath (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello Sir Bharath (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Bharath here... Please check your email... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.225.138.119 (talk) 19:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

The Doc
I've heard that story before, or one very like it, and the fact that the precise match is identified - unusual with such stories - suggests that it may be genuine. However, a quick look in Rae's biography didn't produce a mention of it. I couldn't find the match on CricketArchive, but that's not conclusive if it wasn't a f-c fixture. (The immediately preceding story in our article strikes me as being even more dubious. That story has been told about Grace, but I think it's also been attributed to other cricketers (Thornton?), and I doubt that it's genuine. However that the story is told may in itself say something about the person to whom it's attributed.) JH (talk page) 09:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I already have an online copy of the Memorial Biography. I at one time put a tribute by AA Thomson in the lead, but someone (I can't recall who) replaced it by the CLR James one. When I protested at this having been done without prior consultation, their response was to the effect that since James was a more significant figure than Thomson his tribute was to be preferred. Simon Rae's biography of Grace quotes (p395) the Bishop of Hereford as saying in 1895 that if Grace has been "born an ancient Greek... the Iliad would have been something different. They would have heard not only of Ajax and Diomed, but they would have been adding a third name - that of a hero who would have had the pleasure of killing a great number of people and of being sung in immortal verse! If he had been born in the Middle Ages, Dr Grace would have been a Crusader, of course, and would have been lying with his legs crossed in one of those niches in Bristol Cathedral." So whilst, like you, I am sure that the "national institution" remark long precedes James, it doesn't seem to have been the Bishop of Herford who said it, or Rae would surely have quoted that as well. JH (talk page) 09:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Indian Cricket
Saw on Nigej's talk page you were looking for early editions of Indian Cricket. I've got the 1st edition and a all of the copies from the 80s if that is of any help. What in particular were you after? Wisd e n17 15:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Centuries
Yes, the permutations are a booby trap when you compare these totals. I've changed it to say 124 (or 126) and 197 (or 199) with a reference to the variations article. Hope you're keeping well, Tintin. Best regards. BlackJack | talk page 08:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Invitation
Hi, I gather that you are interested in cricket related articles. Currently, I am engaged in copy editing biographies of various cricketing personalities. I invite your valuable suggestions. OoOpS 16:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Abdul Aziz
Thanks for that, the 'myth' was there before I tidied the article (it had been copy vio'd from here I think (not particularly reliable though). As I couldn't find any RS either was, I left it, but have now changed it to "Some scorecards record it is "absent dead"" (or similar), and referenced it to the Lynch article. Are there any RS actually proving the "absent dead"? A decent ref would be nice. I don't think it crept into Wisden, although I may be wrong.

Also I was going to ask at WT:CRIC about the style guide for Pakistani cricketers (first name, second name) etc, but didn't get round to it. I bow to your knowledge!

Best wishes, –MDCollins (talk) 11:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks –MDCollins (talk) 11:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

FAR for Cricket
Cricket has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. - auburn pilot   talk  02:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Bill Brown
Thanks for spotting the errors. I've updated the article.  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 06:48, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Real Help
This will be a Real help, Mailed that Bharath (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Are You Alive :/ ? Bharath (talk) 16:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

BTW i Bought the latest Book from andrew ward "Cricket's strangest matches" Very interesting Bharath (talk) 17:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Atleast you could have Replied me :-( Bharath (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Governors of Tamil Nadu
Tintin, Can you please take look at List of Governors of Tamil Nadu and give your suggestions on how to improve it? I would like to take it to FL. Thanks, Ganeshk  ( talk ) 01:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

mikha singh
I've restored at your last edit of Nov 2006 jimfbleak (talk) 11:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

EM and WG
Ah, yes, I do believe you're right. Correction on its way. Thanks for pointing out the link. There are presently several WG books available on eBay: I've just bought Darwin's for a quid plus postage but my better half has seized it and insists that it solves the problem of one of my birthday presents next month!! ---BlackJack | talk page 10:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Lumley
Looking at my 'usual' sources: Hansard - as was its way - Captain Lumley but the click over reference is Mr Lawrence Lumley. Its quite possible and common at the time for a formal use of one name and a private or social use of another. I'll see what else I can find. AllsoulsDay (talk) 16:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Corridor of Uncertainty
Fascinating find! I'm in two minds. Should we modify the page to say "but there is some evidence of the term's earlier use" and cite link to that video? Or, because it's Merv's memory -- and sadly not "recorded" that Border said that to him -- do we ignore it? Thoughts? --shannonr (talk) 11:36, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * See my talk page for more on this. --shannonr (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Fingleton's cricket writings
Since you recommended Brightly Fades the Don for the Invincibles project a while ago and know a lot about cricket stats and the Bradman era, I was wondering if you found Fingleton's accuracy to be a bit amiss. A great writer and analyser, but I think he might be a bit careless sometimes which I document here I was refraining from posting it on-wiki just in case I violate BLP by sledging a certain cricket writer.  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 08:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Hope to see you fixing all the errors I make again!  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 05:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

How to use this top Indian Wikipedian list for effective collaboration
Hi, I have added a section 'How to use this list for effective collaboration' on User:Tinucherian/Indians WP page to see if we can put this list to really good use, pl give your thoughts on the same and we can take it further from there. Thanks. Vjdchauhan (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC).

Kanjivellam
Since the AfD discusion for Kanjivellam closed as "keep" despite a total absence of any reason to think that Kanjivellam is not just gruel made with rice and water, I have asked those that didn't favor deletion or redirection to provide reliable sources with which the article could be expanded beyond a dictionary definition.

If you have further reliable sources, or other information about how this article can be developed without simply redirecting it to Gruel, please leave a message at Talk:Kanjivellam. Thanks for your help, WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Ponsford
Hi Tintin. If you have a spare moment or two I was wondering if you might spare them to cast an eye over Bill Ponsford, especially the facts and figures. Relying on secondary sources for some claims can be fraught with danger and you have nearly always been able to identify an error or a myth in articles I have written. If you have any suggestions for material that you think should be included I would be delighted to hear them as well. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 22:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the little fixes. One thing I have noticed, my source claims that Ponsford broke Victor Trumper's record for the highest score in an interstate match. If Trumper held this record, what was the record held by Clem Hill (365) against New South Wales? Or is my source just flat wrong and Ponsford beat Hill's record? As I said above, secondary sources on scores and records are a bit hit and miss. Thanks. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Bearders' Beard
Thanks for your message. I think you're right, it would be much better to have a proper source (it's a shame the BLF doesn't appear to have an operational website) and I agree that the BBC sources are quite weak, considering the more precise sources you've found for the years in question. I'll have another look for a decent source but it would be best to remove the text from the article. Thanks! BunnyDust (talk) 08:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Hutton - Bedser trap
"After the day's play, former Australian Test leg spinner Bill O'Reilly and former teammate of Bradman, now a journalist, consulted Bedser on his use of leg theory. O'Reilly had much experience in attacking leg stump in his career and devised a plan to ensnare Bradman.[46]"

Do we have any other source for this that it was O'Reilly who suggested it ? The anthology The Joy of cricket contains a piece from a book by Alec Bedser. I don't remember what book it was but this four page chapter was titled Even Bradman had battles to fight and is about him bowling to Bradman. It does not contain a word about O'Reilly. Bedser said that they had noticed even in the 1946-7 tour that they could keep Bradman in check by bowling on a leg stump line. From what I remember, Bedser seemed to suggest that it was Norman Yardley and himself who planned it. It has been a decade since I last read it, so my memory could be faulty but it may be worth a check (Joy of cricket is a popular book). Tintin 04:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The Bedser book was Cricket Choice. Tintin 04:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, a lot, because a lot of them cut and paste Fingleton all over the place, and Roland Perry's book of the tour is basically a rip-off of Fingo and then inflated to 3X the size with inane mumblings. The leg trap one is definitely in there but the article has now been changed to saw that O'Reilly help to refine the plan. Bedser of course already got Bradman with it once in 1946-47.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 05:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Good to see you back again. All books have errors so you're needed. Even the Frith and Haigh book on Cricket Australia's archives published in 2007 has a few. Said that ENG/Aus declared at 8/68 and 8/32 in the Brisbane sticky of 1950-51, and that SRW's men won 7 in a row in WC99, they forgot about the tie....Fingo has a few, saying that Loxton debuted at OT when he played the previous season in Tests and a few others. Fingo seems a bit in the Roebuck mould, not too concerned with specific data. Each time Roebuck talks on radio he likes to be wishy-washy with the stats, especially in ODIs he likes being even more vague about the last game which was only three days ago.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 05:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

We really need you at the pointy end of Invincibles Advert  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 08:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Check This Edit
Check this edit sir, i have cleared some mess. i Want to add his Cricket archive profile and This page as a Preference, But how to do it? PS: I hope the "What I can do for you, sir ?" wasn't meant to be derogatory ;-) Bharath (talk) 10:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Was Alright a minute ago, Fainted Now /) Bharath (talk) 05:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Sinhalese Sports Club Ground
for copyedits. the article reads better now. Cheers!--Chanaka L (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Indian Cricket (annual)
I'm not really sure that "let the reader guess" (as in your edit summary) is all that satisfactory, though. If I didn't know anything about the publication and came across that article for the first time, one of my immediate questions would be: "Why did publication cease in 2004?" Annuals don't just stop after over half a century for no reason. I do think we need, if at all possible, to add some sort of explanation: was there any sort of announcement made in The Hindu, or article noting the end of publication in any other Indian (or other) newspaper? Loganberry (Talk) 16:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. Not selling enough copies would seem plausible, certainly. It's a shame that "Indian Cricket" is such a difficult title to search on! Loganberry (Talk) 18:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Kottayam Pushpanath
Improve it (the tharjama) please :) Salih  ( talk ) 19:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

100
Thank you. Actually, the bit I really enjoy is setting the questions, because it drives me back to my books, which don't get read nearly enough. Johnlp (talk) 21:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ooops
No problem at all, Tintin. Don't worry about it. Happy editing! --PFHLai (talk) 14:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

CA
Yes the orcale on the catches often fails, but I check the main scorecard anyway for the byes  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 01:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Eton - Harrow
There's no article, as far as I know. It's on my to-do list, but I don't expect to get round to it any time soon. JH (talk page) 19:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Books on 1948
Do you know others apart from Fingo, that can give details on the tour matches. Fingo barely talks about anything of the tour matchest, so those parts are mostly scorecard reading. WCA isn't all that detailed on the tour matches I don't think  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 07:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Indian umpires
WEre they really that dreadful. I've read in basically all Australian books of them giving Indians not out in the old days, caught at second slip. Or giving out Brian Booth in 64/65 when the wicket-keeper fuimbled the ball a few meters away and did a stumping with his fist??? (Haigh said that)  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 01:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Sang Hue
If you could turn up a citation for that, it would be a great thing to include. :) JH (talk page) 17:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 1 – June 2009
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 11:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Rose of Lima
Just wanted to give you a heads up that I might have an answer to your question there at the reference desk. I'm not sure how solid it is, though, so hopefully someone else will chime in, too. :) JKBrooks85 (talk) 11:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

British Library
Thanks. I know someone who will ne particularly interested in that, the user calling himself Robertson-Glasgow. JH (talk page) 09:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * It doesn't interest me so much as make me keen to reveal more. What's your email address, Tintin? Crusoe (talk) 07:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 15:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Perry
Haigh gave his latest book a zero  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 08:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Third session
It's certainly possible. I think that at this time the tea interval may have been 4:15 to 4:35, with close of play on the last day being at 5:30 plus the extra half hour till 6:00 if either side had a chance of winning. Also the standard playing hours were sometimes varied to allow an early finish on the last day if one team was playing the next day and had a long journey, but checking the Indians' itinerary that doesn't apply here. Also the time of the tea interval sometimes varied. Such variations would be more likely in a "friendly" fixture like this than in a Championship match.

The relevant part of the match report in the 1972 Wisden says: "Left to make 182 to win in two and a quarter hours, Baig alone for India seemed to appreciate the possibility of knocking off the runs at a rate of nearly five an over." JH (talk page) 08:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

About Test Cricket Bowling Cricket Records
If you are a fan of cricket then you know how difficult it is to sum up even important facts and records (leave aside all records) related to Test Cricket in a single page. A single page can't do justice to team records as well as individual records, batting records as well as bowling records and fielding records, captaincy records, wicket-keeping records etc and the list goes on. So I just want to dedicate one single page to bowling records, one single page to batting records and so on... U can see for yourself that the bowling record section on the current record page doesn't even mention these important facts. While similar/analogous data for batting has been mentioned. I have all these facts related to Test bowling ready with me. so please let me proceed. Reply Soon. Regards.Snigdh.Chandra (talk) 08:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC) Snigdh
 * Most Career Wicket - Progression of Record
 * Most No. of 5 wickets/innings
 * Most No. of 10 wickets/match
 * Most No. of maiden overs in career
 * Most No. of duck dismissals by a bowler
 * Most No. of wickets through caught & bowled, stumped, LBW, etc.
 * Facts related to hat-tricks

Thanx, plz wait for two days, deletion is in your hand. If things don't look fine then you are the boss. Snigdh

Snigdh.Chandra (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Sourav Ganguly/archive1
I've tried to address your concerns. Could you please take a look? Thanks Abeer.ag (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank You, and thanks for your comments on Sehwag Abeer.ag (talk) 07:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Bodyline
My memory is of reading that Jardine enlisted Arthur Carr, captain of Notts and ex-England captain, as an ally during the summer of 1932, and that Carr tried out Bodyline in some of Notts' matches late in the 1932 season. I don't think that Bowes would have used it. John Arlott says that he saw the final day's play of the Essex v Nottinghamshire match at Leyton on 5th August. When Carr declared, Essex were set 298 in four hours. For Larwood's third over, "Instead of going into slips, the close fieldsmen took up places on the leg side. I turned to my companion in surprise... 'Good Lord, he's going to bounce them round his ears.'" It was a placid pitch, and the tactic was unsuccessful. "Larwood had bowled all but his first two overs to a leg-side field, and taken no wickets for 43 runs in 16 overs." Voce apparently did not try Bodyline. "Notts then had a sequence of five matchers in the North but, three weeks later, on 24, 25 and 26 August, they played Glamorgan at Cardiff. My curiosity led me to that game, Maurice Turnbull... proceeded to hook Larwood's leg-attack with an imperious power, heady to watch and, for me, conclusive proof that this bowling was a waste of time." "Aelott on Cricket"", edited by David Rayvern Allen, Fontana/Collins, 1985, pp192-3. I imagine that the tactic was so much more effective in Australia partly by being subsequently refined, but mainly because Australian pitches tended to be quicker and bouncier. They also tended to have longer boundaries, which may have been a factor. Feel free to use any of this material to modify the Bodyline article. JH (talk page) 09:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Rereading that bit of the article that you quoted:
 * I didn't think that Bodyline was used in 1931 as well as 1932.
 * Judging by what Arlott writes, it was far from perfected before the ship sailed, and opposing sides were hardly terrorised. Notts' Championship finishes, 4th in 1931 and 5th in 1932, were no better than might have been expected when they had two such good fast bowlers. After all, they had won the Championship in 1929 without using Bodyline.
 * In the matches that Arlott watched, Voce apparently did not bowl Bodyline.

JH (talk page) 17:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I've now looked in my copy of Swanton's "Sort of a Cricket Person" (pp65-67), which gives a very different impression to Arlott's pece. Swanton says: "The first signs of what came to be known as Bodyline were to be observed, probably, around 1930 when... Harold Larwood and Bill Voce were sometimes spurred on by their captain, A.W. Carr, to drop the ball short and make it fly around the ears of county batsmen... With Carr's active encouragement the Notts fast bowling was inclined occasionally, shall I say, to become a little 'rough'." (p65) A bit later on: "In the summer of 1932 the Notts bowling had elicited a few more grumbles, as had that of Bill Bowes for Yorkshire. I recall watching him bowling at the end of August... He let go some fast bouncers at the Hampshire captain, Lord Tennyson, who (then aged 42) was not amused... A more significant protest had been made earlier in the month at the Oval... Bowes bowled short and fast at Jack Hobbs, who protested both on the field and in print." (p67) The one thing that isn't clear is to what extent a "bodyline" field was employed, but apart from that caveat it seems that what the Bodyline article says is probably justified. And it seems to be properly referenced. JH (talk page) 18:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Lumpy
Hi, Tintin. That's a very good question and I'm 90% certain that it was an arrangement which changed with the 1774 Laws. If memory serves, under the 1744 code, I think the toss decided both choice of innings and location of pitch but I'm almost sure that in 1774 they changed it so that the senior bowler on the visiting team chose the pitch. If it was a neutral ground, I suppose the toss decided it as before but I'm really not sure about that one because they might have let the umpires decide. It certainly did change at some point so that the umpires decided but I think that was in the 19th century, much later. I'm sure I've got something about this in one of my books so I'll have a look through and get back to you.

I'll reword the piece in the Lumpy article.

All the best. --Jack | talk page 14:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I happened to spot this discussion. There's a useful piece that appears in Wisden on average about once a decade entiteled "Dates in Cricket History", originally written by Harry Altham. I looked it up in the 1965 edition, and on page 154 there's a bit on the toss:


 * 1744 - toss confers choice of pitch and innings
 * 1774 - away team has choive of pitch and innings
 * c1809 - umpires choose pitch, toss confers choice of innings

JH (talk page) 08:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * And in Harry Altham's History of Cricket on p.28 is the following:
 * "In the 1744 Code the winning of the toss gave not only the choice of innings but also of the pitch. In 1744 the visiting side had choice of both — on neutral grounds the toss was to decide — and it was not until early in the next century that the siting of the pitch was left to the umpires... Until then the picking of the pitch 'within 30 yards of a centre determined by the adversaries' was generally deputed to the best bowler..."
 * And Lumpy was an expert at making sure he always pitched it on a brow! --Jack | talk page 18:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Tintin 08:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem, Tintin. Thinking about the 1774 rule change, this coincided with the peak of Lumpy's career and I wonder if his talent for picking a difficult pitch was the catalyst for the change?  It was certainly Lumpy who instigated the introduction of the middle stump after he scored a football hat-trick against John Small.  Could be.  --Jack | talk page 05:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

?
I used to. Rather seriously too, might I add. Up until about four years ago. Then stopped, and never could restart ... unfortunately. Godof86 (talk) 05:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Tosh
Is it clear to the layman? Bradman wanted to use leg theory to stop them scoring and getting a lead before the rain came, else Yardley would have gotten 100 ahead, declared and let Australia chase a sticky. If he attacked there was a danger that Compton could have smashed the balls everywhere and wiped out the deficit. If England were in arrears on a sticky they couldn't have declared and could've been bowled out quickly. Straight from Fingo  YellowMonkey  ( cricket photo poll! ) paid editing=POV 03:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you get the details of Arlott's book where Fingo has to be overruled? Thanks  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 03:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

R E Foster
Hi Tintin. Use of nicknames is one of the main complaints I have about CricInfo. Another example is "Monkey" Hornby. The thing is that you read several books and become well acquainted with names like A N Hornby and R E Foster. It comes down to an established naming convention and I think with nicknames there has to be clear evidence of universal use (e.g., Jack Hobbs). --Jack | talk page 04:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

On the same topic I see that Chandrasekhar has been moved from Bhagwat to B. S., I'm more used to seeing Bhagwat but not from Cricinfo who strangely has him as Bhagwath. Any thoughts on Chandra's common name? --Jpeeling (talk) 22:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

20 things you never knew about Wisden
Thanks. I've now updated Eric Ravilious. JH (talk page) 08:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Booth
Fixed  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 06:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Couldn't find anything specifc about Haigh's source  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 03:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Added Coleman  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 01:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:Ooops
No problem - these things happen! ;) Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi!
Tintin,

Hope you are doing well. Just stopped by to say Hi!. --Jyothis (talk) 02:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Consolidation
Check your Mail :-) Bharath (talk) 06:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tintin1107! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Sujeewa de Silva -

Gangu GA
hi Tintin. When you next drop in, can you take a look at this. Heaps of stuff is missing, I noted some, but didn't follow Indian cricket much until 2003, so I might have missed other stuff  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket )  08:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Ayub and Loxton
Fixed up. My mistake  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars photo poll )  03:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And an email book request  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars photo poll )  04:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

List of first-class cricket records
Well, you're right, of course, and as the match is credited by Cricketarchive as being first-class then it ought to be part of the list. Much rather do that than get rid of DIK, who are part of folklore as well as the record books! (I always assumed that one of the functions of DIK was to reassure poor teams that they weren't in fact the worst ever.) Good to see you back here: hopefully more than just a fleeting visit? In anticipation that that is the case, I'll leave you to amend the record. Johnlp (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't work too hard. There's too much cricket going on (not T20!) to let work get in the way. Johnlp (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Geoff Clayton
Nice article. Just one thing: I think that "But his abrasive personality did not endear him to county committees..." really ought to have a citation. JH (talk page) 08:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry. That was supposed to be put on Johnlp's talk page. I've no idea how I managed to put it here! JH (talk page) 18:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)
This newsletter is automatically delivered by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 03:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi!
Hope you are doing well. Just saying Hi!. --Jyothis (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Figured :). How is life? --Jyothis (talk) 12:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

St Hill
Yes, I'll be adding a ref to that quote but I hope to expand the article over the next few days so I didn't reference it yet. Are you a fan (book, player or both!)? --Sarastro1 (talk) 08:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries at Brabourne Stadium
As you are one of the biggest contributors to WP:Cricket from India, I req your comments on the following FLC -. Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 10:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Iv replied your query on the page. It is one of the few Indian grounds with FA potential - though theres a lot more work to be done, I ran into a brick wall looking for good refs for the history and pre 1973 matches section, they are limited. Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 06:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Iv used the Raiji&Dossa book as ref in a few places - however its best used minimum as its a CCI publication. Per WP:YESPOV it could be used but should not be the main ref in the article. The other one should be good as well - I cant find it on Google books though - guess you will be updating the article with that as ref when u get round to reading it. Its a panorama - some things have great number of refs (such as recent international matches), some recent things are not on record (atleast from my various searches). For eg. I am yet to find a ref for the new media centre built above the north stand for the Champions Trophy in 2006! One would have thought this should be well documented. Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 08:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your help in promoting the article to FL status! Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 11:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

RE:Square yards
I dont have the book either - I relied on google snippet previews for refs from that book. I thought it might be the case that the actual stadium takes up 75000 sy and the rest is used for the tennis/badminton/squash courts, swimming pool etc, was unsure thats why Iv dint change it. What are your thoughts? Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 05:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Ashes series/archive2
Hey, thanks for your comments at Featured list candidates/List of Ashes series/archive2; I think I've addressed all the comments and concerns currently there, and was hoping you might revisit for another look?  Harrias  talk 16:31, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Nor apparently does anyone else! Thanks for your useful comments, it's always nice to have an external view, I find that when I've worked on an article for a while, I can't see anything but exactly how the article already does it. (If you know what I mean.)  Harrias  talk 07:11, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Drowned.
Excellent. Good to see your taste for the macabre is still thriving! Now did any more cricketers die on the Titanic? Or the Lusitania? Johnlp (talk) 08:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. What about this chap? Died at sea but apparently didn't drown. Wisden's not clear what he actually died from. Johnlp (talk) 09:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Seven so far... Johnlp (talk) 10:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Crawford
Yes, I have access to times archives. I couldn't find much except his obituary, but I may have missed something. --Sarastro1 (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Not much I'm afraid. This is the full obituary from 3 Dec 1965:

Obituary PRINCE VIJAYA OF VIZIANAGRAM, former Indian cricket test captain, died in Benares yesterday at the age of 59. He played in three tests for India, all against England in 1936, and was three times President of the Indian Cricket Control Board. He was elected to the Lower House of Parliament in 1960. Before independence he had been Minister of Justice in the Uttar government.

Hope this helps! --Sarastro1 (talk) 11:22, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Calloway
Heya, sorry I was overseas for the last week and a bit so didn't get your message until just now. All I can add is that it while it would be unusual for a player to swap clubs half way through a season, it certainly wouldn't be unheard of. A Test player whose name escapes me now moved to Melbourne Cricket Club relatively late in the season when a member found work for him. --Roisterer (talk) 10:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

WCI 2011
Hiya, Im currently helping out with WikiConference India 2011 (first such a national annual Wiki event in India). Just wondering if you can spare time to help out with the programming Team. Cheers, Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 08:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedia Stories Project
Hello,

My name is Victor Grigas, and I'm a storyteller at the Wikimedia foundation. We're telling stories of Wikipedia users, editors, donors, programmers and staff to paint a picture of who uses Wikipedia - for the 2011 fundraiser.

I am in the process of planning a trip to India to gather stories from Indian Wikipedians in face-to-face interviews (possibly on video).

My primary goal is to conduct 15-20 interviews, and hopefully enough of my interviews will make compelling stories that will effectively solicit donations from the public. These stories may also be used for other communication purposes by the foundation.

I found your userpage on a list of prolific Wikipedians and thought I’d reach out to you. Prolific editing is always a good story to tell!

If you are interested in participating, please contact me via my email:

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Thank you for your time!

Victor

About me: I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2005, and have a background in film, video and audio. My userpage can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

PWT
Hi Tintin. I've been following the edits this morning. Are you okay now about this issue? I understand that several of the edits by the six accounts were speedy deleted because of personal attack. They all relate to the same source, apparently, per the CU test. It would be good if someone like the real PWT were to join but not on this occasion. Regards. Jack | talk page 12:54, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Brabourne Stadium GA
Hiya,

I dont know whether your still active, but Im hoping you can help me @ Brabourne Stadium. Iv been working on it again and I hope to start a GA review for it soon. Prior to that, Im tying up all the references and Iv had a bit of difficulty finding page numbers related to the raiji-dossa book. Also, if you could I would appreciate you going through the article and advising me of anything that needs attention/helping with general fixes. Cheers, Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 10:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I found refs for those 2 - thanks. I need refs for the single wicket/mankad sentence as well as the new interzonal tournament/duleep trophy one. Im not sure the raiji/dossa one covers it properly. Just FYI - Iv been asked to get the article copyedited before the GA - Iv left word with a few editors for help, hopefully it should come through. No cricket ground article is a GA yet, so we will be making a start with this one :) Thanks, Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 14:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The page number mentioned is the same as some previous refs, so I wanted to double check the single wicket thing. As for the interzonal - the ref needs to state that it was the same tournament that was revived as Duleep trophy - since I cant get my hands on the raiji/dossa, I cant double check the page numbers. Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 14:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm - thanks for your input. Do have a look at the article and let me know if you think there is anything that requires attention (do have a look at your email as well :)). I will ping again if something comes up, I hope you dont mind. Cheers, Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 14:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

BCCI Lists
Recently, I moved 2 lists from the main Board of Control for Cricket in India article to their own articles - presidents and members as the BCCI article was too cluttered with the lists. Iv been trying to locate a reference for the list of presidents and their tenure, but Iv not come across anything thus far (not even on BCCI's own website). On the members list, Iv been trying to locate the year in which the affiliate acquired membership of the BCCI, again up a brick wall. Off hand, can you think of any good sources? Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 12:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

List of cricketers who were killed during military service
Hi. It's incomplete. I compiled the list initially by searching on the years and places of death on a player's CricketArchive article .. but that didn't give me everyone because I later found more cricketers in Wisden Obituaries, so there is bound to be more. Not too many more, but I certainly can't claim that it's complete. Cheers. Jevansen (talk) 07:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

LBW
Thanks for your comments. I've replied at my talk page to try to keep things in one place. I think some of your points are already covered, but let me know if you think they need to be more explicit, and feel free to argue with any of my replies. The main problem is sourcing. We need a source which makes some of the things more explicit. If you know of any or have any yourself, I'd be delighted to use them. --Sarastro1 (talk) 19:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

& (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bot_requests&oldid=481419438#Message_to_take_part_in_Assessment_Drive request] on Bot requests. The Helpful  Bot  01:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Death, where is thy forward short leg?
Very good. It's a kind of pseudonymous, posthumous fame for us too. You should mention it on the WP:CRIC page and yes, let's see if we can do the same with the road accidents. Johnlp (talk) 14:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

LBW
I'm not sure how often you are on here these days. Anyway, I'm hoping to add a little more to Leg before wicket and maybe have a stab at FAC at some point. I've found a few academic articles on lbw statistical analysis and what that suggests, which I intend to add, but I wondered if you feel there is anything missing. For example, is there any mileage in adding some stats about most dismissals lbw, etc? Or is that too listy, or not really appropriate for FA? Any suggestions welcome. On the question of the 1744 laws, there is a mention of the same info in Barclay's World of Cricket, but given that one of the contributors to that book is Brodribb, it may be the same source! If you are not too sure about it, I can take it out. Sarastro1 (talk) 12:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

RE: BCCI
Not a respected reference such as a newspaper/book, just the regular website you pointed me to. Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 16:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Allan Border/archive1
Hi, hope I've fixed your concerns. Would you mind having another look over it? &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  17:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you collapse them so as to indicate that your concerns have been resolved. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  07:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

List of ODI international records
nominated List of One Day International cricket records for featured list candidate here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status.-- Black hole77  talk 05:29, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi!
Just saying Hi!. I am still around (in case you remember me) :) --Jyothis (talk) 03:54, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * ഇവിടെയൊക്കെ തന്നെയുണ്ട്. മലയാളം വിക്കിയിലായിരുന്നു. കുറച്ചുകാലമായി സ്റ്റ്യുവാഡുപണിയാണ് പ്രധാന തൊഴിൽ. സുഖമല്ലെ? --Jyothis (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian cricket selectors, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bob Simpson, Alan Davidson and Jack Ryder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

James Quinton
Here's a bit of a collector's item for those of us who "enjoy" cricketing "morbidiana". Found with the top of his head shot off in the lavatory of a first-class carriage of a train between London and Reading. If you can get The Times on line, there's a report in the issue of 27 December 1922: verdict was "Suicide during temporary insanity". Johnlp (talk) 10:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

~Bing~
Hello Bharath (talk) 07:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

FYI
Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Mark Waugh/archive1 &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  08:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Would you mind re-visiting the page as your comments may have been resolved? &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  07:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Bartlett
I replied on the talk page: there seem to be contemporary reports supporting both versions. Not necessarily helpful, I know... Johnlp (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian cricket team in England in 1971, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abid Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)