User talk:TintoRetto

Polish oppression
The polish Pans who civilized Ukraine and Belarus have more right to those articles than anybody else. Pan Space Cadet 18:18, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * It depends on how many Eastern Slavic serfs you have and oppress. IMHO Xenia got it right that I should leave the articles on Eastern Europe alone since I personally have only 35 serfs and oppress only half of them (not even every day, I admit...). Perhaps we could establish some wikipedia guideline or rule that would permit to edit an article related to Eastern Europe only if the wikipedian has a certain amount of serfs. Or even better, we could make it a point system: 1 point per every male serf abused, 2 points per every female serf abused, 1 point per every 10 serfs not abused (gender irrelevant here), plus 5 points per every latifundium in Ukraine, Belarus or Russia, 5 additional points for every Orthodox priest expelled from his or hers lands and so on. Whoever gets 100 points - is free to edit. Only true magnates should be allowed, the average Polish pans are not honourable enough.


 * A similar rule of thumb could be established for Eastern Slavs. They would be allowed to edit the articles on Central Europe. Points for manors looted, Byzantine ships sunk, lakh, zhyd or klekha killed (impaled, of course) or for every female taken captive. To make it easier for younger revolutionaries, we could establish a wiki commission that would check if the person is able to fly the Sacred Red Banner for, let's say, 1 hour. If so - 60 points granted. What do you say? Halibutt 20:37, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)


 * You've got it all wrong boys. I'm certain dear Xenia was referring to me.  Due to a historic quirk of surname Romanization, she thought that this humble &#1093;&#1086;&#1093;&#1086;&#1083; had been left in charge of the livestock and serfs.  Let me tell you, that would have been a mistake.  &mdash;Michael Z.


 * Nyah, that would be totally absurd. Every child knows that we, the Polish pans, are very keen on oppression of Eastern Slavs and that in order to bleed a serf dry, we always place some foreigner, like a Jew or Armenian, in charge. Your name - whatever the romanisation system is used - is still too Slavic. After all nothing beats the fun of seing the poor serfs get angry at a Jew, who in turn gets angry at them. Divide et impera, there's no rule as devilish as that.


 * But seriously now, I was hoping that the demons of "White Polish pans" are long-dead. Apparently I was wrong... Halibutt 23:56, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)

Join RWNB!
Hello, TintoRetto! I thought you might be interested in the Russian wikipedians' notice board. Come check it out! We could use more help! KNewman 19:50, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

Requested_moves
TintoRetto, I once lost my temper over comments by Mikkalai, but he deserves to be respected for the huge body of valuable contributions he's made to Wikipedia. You on the other hand, are making yourself known for denigrating people and nations.

In discussions, just stick to facts that are supported in literature. Don't write about the participants; this is considered a personal attack. Don't address people by their ethnicity; this is considered prejudiced or racist. Don't indulge in name-calling. This kind of rhetoric waters down your argument, and discredits you and your side of the debate.

&mdash;Michael Z. 17:48, 2004 Dec 29 (UTC)

The language and your recent move
Dear TintoRetto, while I do not oppose the transfer of Old Ruthenian language to Old East Slavic language, and especially so since both terms seem to be correct, acceptable and compromise, it would definitely not hurt if you proposed such a move on the respective talk page.

Don't get me wrong, but moving the article the day after the proposal of transfer was not accepted by a wiki voting gives a bad impression. Halibutt 16:02, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

Ivangorod
Thanks for all your help over at the article. The picture really spruces the article up. AmishCellPhone 23:30, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gontcharova/Larionov/Serebryakova compyright
They are works  of Russian painters, exponated in Russian galleries and published in Russian and Soviet catalogs, most of them are from Russian museums. Soviet Union (and Russia) jointed copyright convention quite late, thus all the works exponated before 1973 are Public Domain ouside fSU. Thus, the label:. abakharev 09:33, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Oreshek.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oreshek.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Priluki.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Priluki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Detinets.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Detinets.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 14:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Holmsgard.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Holmsgard.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Korela.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Korela.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 23:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Vologda_kremlin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vologda_kremlin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Vologda_gorniy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vologda_gorniy.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Priluki.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Priluki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Rostov_kremlin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rostov_kremlin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ivangorod.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ivangorod.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW ( Talk ) 03:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)