User talk:Tintor2/Archive 13

DYK nomination of Himura Kenshin
Hello! Your submission of Himura Kenshin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Kenshin
Try searching the journals section of NLA Trove - even if you can't access the articles yourself, you can still glean enough bibliographic detail for promising articles to search for them in your own libraries. Also, have you tried all the sources listed at WikiProject_Anime_and_manga/Online_reliable_sources? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 00:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * You should consider joining your national library and state library - they have a lot of publications aimed at librarians that can be useful for people who regularly write about manga. Check out EBSCOhost too - the "Critical Survey of Graphic Novels : Manga" book that's available via EBSCOhost seems to have an article about the series that Kenshin is from.  --122.108.141.214 (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I found a couple of sources and put them in the main Kenshin article for you - if you can't get access to these through your state or national library, ask at WP:LIBRARY for help. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 06:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Source Review Request
I hope that all of your current projects are going well. I was wondering if you could possibly do a source review for my current FAC? I have fortunately received a lot of feedback on this nomination in only a few days, and it only requires a source review. I apologize for the intrusion, and I understand if you either do not have the time or interest to do it as it is a very busy time of year. Thank you either way and hope you are having a wonderful weekend so far. I would be more than happy to help with your future projects. Aoba47 (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Sanboxes
How exactly do you use them to make new video game pages? Osh33m (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Ermac
Thank you for the feedback. I'll get on it. :) sixty nine   • speak up •  13:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit notice for Eren Yeager?
How do we get the editnotice for Attack on Titan added to Eren Yeager's page? It seems to have more edits to change the name again. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Tidus' page
The changes I made to Tidus' page were reverted because Wikipedia allows spoilers. I want to ask whether it is good practice to put major spoilers in the page introduction itself, even though that very piece of information has been properly discussed in a later section of the article? NeutronStar10 (talk) 17:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

I see. Thank you.

Although, the intro to Lightning's article does not contain a late game spoiler like Tidus' does. NeutronStar10 (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, saw Tidus' page today. I feel that the new content is a lot more suitable. :) NeutronStar10 (talk) 10:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Book chapters citations
Good work on finding the book chapter for Allen Walker! Don't forget to check whether a work is an edited volume when you're citing it - the editors aren't necessarily who wrote the chapters of the book and that can cause problems with citations (there's a bit more on this in WP:HOWCITE). I've changed this one to show you what I mean. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 05:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Mai Shiranui
I've started a mass cleanup of this character's reception section. I feel it's far too long (15k bytes removed just in one subsection alone) and oversourced, particularly with an excess amount of foreign-language (particularly Chinese) sites that aren't of much use to readers on an English-language article. Then there's the repetitious quotes about either her hotness or her hooters, which is pretty much the backbone of her popularity. I can appreciate the insane amount of work that was put into it, but at the end of the day she's a video game character and not Elvis. Sorry to bug you but I feel more comfortable occasionally dropping a line here about my VG-article machinations. :) sixty nine   • speak up •  01:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Tidus scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Tidus article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 22 June 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/June 22, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Good to see it today, the "the male main character from the 2001 video game Final Fantasy X as well as a playable one in other crossover titles"! I remember reviewing with pleasure. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

FAC Source Review Request
I hope you are having a wonderful weekend so far. I was wondering if you could possibly do a source review for my current FAC? I apologize for the intrusion, and I understand if you either do not have the time or interest to do it as it is a very busy time of year. Thank you either way and hope you are having a wonderful weekend so far. I would be more than happy to help with any of your projects. Aoba47 (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello again, I apologize again for the intrusion, but I was wondering if you could possibly do another source review for another one of my FACs? Thank you again for all of your help in the past. I hope you have a great weekend. I would be more than happy to help with any of your projects. Aoba47 (talk) 17:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello yet again lol. I was wondering if you could possible do a source review for my latest FAC? I would be more than happy to help out with any of your projects. I hope you had a wonderful weekend and a great day so far. Aoba47 (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Boruto Uzumaki at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Boruto Uzumaki
Hello! Your submission of Boruto Uzumaki at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ISD (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

List of D.Gray-man chapters
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article List of D.Gray-man chapters has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BorutoUzumakiOlder.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:BorutoUzumakiOlder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 1989 19:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Sasuke
No, I can't help you there, sorry! Try WP:JAPAN, they might have someone who might be able to help. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 02:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Question
Hey Tintor2,

Would you be able to find a source about the full date that Naruto was released on Weekly Shone Jump? The only info I have is that it was released on no. 43 of the magazine in 1999.- 1989 01:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Would you be able to do a source review for Naruto? -- 1989 21:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Allen Walker copyedit
Thanks Miniapolis. The article seems better now.Tintor2 (talk) 22:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Disneyland Railroad featured article nomination
The Disneyland Railroad article is currently being nominated to become a featured article here: Featured article candidates/Disneyland Railroad/archive1. I see that you are one of the more active reviewers for featured article candidates, so I eagerly invite you to weigh in on this one. It has passed specialized reviews for its images and sources, and one review for its prose, but it still needs a few people to chime and say they support the nomination on the review page to wrap things up. Your input on that page will be very helpful.  Jackdude 101  ( Talk ) 19:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Boruto Uzumaki
Hello! Your submission of Boruto Uzumaki at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Special:Diff/787362831
Hey Tintor2,

They gave the page numbers from an Q&A. -- 1989 15:47, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Here it is per this. -- 1989 17:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Walt Disney World Railroad featured article nomination
Well, I nominated another one: Featured article candidates/Walt Disney World Railroad/archive1. You are welcome to comment on it, if you wish.  Jackdude 101  19:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

.hack//GU
We need some more people to weigh in at Talk:.hack//G.U.. Me and another editor are kind of in a deadlock of opinions about what this article's about. -- Kraftlos  (Talk &#124; Contrib) 02:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Boruto Uzumaki
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Help with Source Review (Mercy Point)
Hello again! I hope that you are having a wonderful day. I was wondering if you possibly conduct a source review for my current FAC? I understand if you do not have the time or energy. Either way, good luck with your current projects on here and in real life. Aoba47 (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi. When you have the time, could you also look over Featured article candidates/Dragon Ball (manga)/archive1 for a source review? I'll be happy to take a look at Lars and give input on the talk page after the copyedit if you'd like me to. -- 1989 14:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello again, I apologize for always asking for your help. I was wondering if you could possibly conduct a source review for my current FLC? This will be the last time that I will request a source review from you as I am planning retiring once my two GANs and this FLC are completed. Thank you again for all of your help! Aoba47 (talk) 04:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Sasuke Uchiha
Hello:

I have had a look at the article Sasuke Uchiha as requested and made some minor changes.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Roxas (Kingdom Hearts)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Roxas (Kingdom Hearts) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Lars Alexandersson
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Lars Alexandersson has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks as usual Twofingered Typist.Tintor2 (talk) 23:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Lars Alexandersson
I just made a batch of edits to what the last editor did. I guess I'm done with the article for the time being. I think it's pretty good as it is. --uKER (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


 * UKER, Okay, let's do it.Tintor2 (talk) 00:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lars Alexandersson
The article Lars Alexandersson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lars Alexandersson for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

GA
Hi Tintor2, would you be interested in grabbing 13 Assassins (2010 film) for evaluation against the GA criteria? Hoping for your acceptance. Best, Slightlymad (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Tai
Great work on the article. I'm not sure exactly what you're asking me - would WP:ANIME be the place to go to to ask if Tai would be considered mid importance? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 00:57, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Ah, and so you were thinking I might be able to rustle up some good sources to demonstrate that Tai is so notable that he should be of higher importance? You might like to check animemangastudies.wordpress.com, but I don't think the scholarship on Digimon is very well-developed.  If you wanted to change tack and work on some Miyazaki articles instead, they'd have piles of sources, but I don't think Digimon does.  --122.108.141.214 (talk) 01:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LarsKishimoto.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:LarsKishimoto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Replica sword
I know nothing about this, have you tried the Wikipedia reference desk service? Asking there might help you get on the right track. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Does Amy Plumb say nothing? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 22:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

WP:Reference desk --122.108.141.214 (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lenalee Lee
Hello! Your submission of Lenalee Lee at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

re:
Hey Tintor2,

The page numbers are linked here. – 1989 01:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Question about FAC
Hello again! I was wondering if you could look at my sources in my current FAC? There were a few concerns about a few of the sources, and I would greatly appreciate your feedback as that is the only part left of the FAC before a final decision can be reached. Thank you, and I hope that you are having a wonderful day! Aoba47 (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello! Sorry for always asking for your help with source reviews. I was wondering if you could look at my current FAC? Either way, I hope you had a wonderful day. Aoba47 (talk) 14:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Lenalee Lee
Alex ShihTalk 00:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Re: Tekken Player
Well, thanks, but I haven't really edited on the Tekken articles much in a while. Lately, I've mostly just been lurking, while editing every so often. I just thought Lucky Chloe could use her own article, so I went ahead and created it. I seen the articles you've worked on too. Nice job.

I've been meaning to get one of the characters articles to GA before too. I tried doing so for Lili and Ling Xiaoyu in the past, but they weren't successful. Any ideas? Kokoro20 (talk) 06:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Lars Alexandersson
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Exchange
Hi Tintor, if you have the time would you mind leaving some comments at the /Nights: Journey of Dreams? Its previous nomination failed but now it reads a lot smoother it stands a much better chance. Of course, I'll be happy to exchange reviews for anything you have up now or in the future. Don't worry if you can't do it. Thanks! JAG UAR   20:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

problem
what is probleme and raison for delet my edits in article attack on titan, edits true ؟؟؟  anwar bn al hosein  call me  15:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Sasuke FAC
Hey Tintor2,

Do you plan to nominate the article on your own, or do you need a co-nominator? -- 1989 19:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for thinking of me when considering nominating Sasuke's article for FAC. I think that the article is very promising, and it helps that the sources that we've been using for the main Naruto article have also apparently been sifted through and used where appropriate in Sasuke's article. There are a few turns of phrase which indicate that the Sasuke article could use a copyedit, and all the citations in Japanese also could use a courtesy translation to English by using the |trans-title field. If you were to nominate for FAC right this second, those would be my main issues. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

N Ship 2
Hi there. Thought I'd drop by to give you something. While the reception section seems alright, I'd agree the development section is a little thin. But fear not, I've done some work going through the blog, and I'm here to give you translations from the posts by the game's director Yutaka Senko (bottom two) and the producer Yuuki Nishikawa. Hope these help. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * In this early post, Nishikawa essentially says that the game has been in development since the release of the first Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm title. He also adds that the multiplayer feature was added based on player feedback from the first game.
 * In this one, Senko discusses creating the battle system. In adding new features, it was a matter of trial and error, in addition to balancing all the elements so each character has a fair chance of winning a fight. A cited example is of a fight between young Naruto and Jiraiya, where the staff made adjustments so it was equally fun and empowering playing as either character.
 * In this one, Senko states that he wanted to "recreate" the look and feel comics during the videos and cinematic sequences. This required going through the whole game and adjusting elements to fit this ambition while ensuring the gameplay remained responsive. All the sequences were worked out using storyboards beforehand, then the gameplay elements were created, before the aesthetic and sound design parts were added in.

Naruto/Naruto Uzumaki
So are you still going to nominate either of these articles for TFA next month? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Jill Valentine FAC
Hi Tintor2. I commented on your FAC for Tidus. I was wondering if you could comment on my FAC for Jill Valentine? See here. I'm in a rather awkward place at the nomination as while many people are supporting it, the two people who aren't are pretty much telling me it's so terrible it needs to be completely rewritten. As one of the very few people who has successfully nominated a video game character for FAC, I would really appreciate your opinions on the article. Please let me know if you see anything wrong with it. I would be happy to comment on another nomination of yours in return, but no worries if you're too busy. Cheers. Freikorp (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Pages where I can find information from other users
You can ask people to answer a general question ("reference interview") for you at the WP:Reference desk. To ask people to help you access a specific source that you can't view for free online, you can ask at WP:TWL. Good luck! --122.108.141.214 (talk) 23:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Orochimaru (Naruto)
(Re Orochimaru (Naruto) on RX). If you want to find information about Orochimaru (Naruto), a manga character, and its inspiration in mythology, then yes, ask on Reference desk/Entertainment. Or you can instead ask on some forum outside of Wikipedia, such as Anime & Manga Stack Exchange. If you don't get a good enough answer on one forum, you can try to ask on another forum one or two weeks later, just make sure to put hyperlinks between the question threads both ways so that people don't have to duplicate work already done in another thread. – b_jonas 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Lenalee Lee
Hello:

I am working on the copy edit of this article you requested from the GOCE. I am now working on the Appearances section. This sentence - "This leads the Millennium Earl to believe that Lenalee might possess the "Great Heart" that both exorcists and Noah search but is saved by the returning Allen." - is confusing me. Could you clarify this? You might want to have a look at what I've done up to this point to make sure I haven't introduced any errors during the edit. Thanks. Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Lenalee Lee
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Lenalee Lee has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lenalee Lee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lenalee Lee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 02:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lenalee Lee
The article Lenalee Lee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lenalee Lee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 01:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

MK characters
Sorry for the completely lazy title, but I'm thinking of working on Johnny Cage next. That certainly has some GA potential since it'll likely be easier to find more behind-the-scenes content on the character. It wasn't until MKX that NetherRealm finally revealed any extensive information on Ermac's design, which was a mite frustrating. sixty nine  • speak up •  01:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review of Fawad Khan
Hi! I've requested a peer review for Fawad Khan, it was listed as GA but failed FAC. It'd be kind of you to review it.(Peer review/Fawad Khan/archive1). Thanks Amirk94391 (talk) 03:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2 has been completed.

I did add a few attributions in the Critical Response section but there does not appear to be any consensus around this as far as I can tell - some reviewers expect it, others contend that if a reader is curious about who said what they can always check the cited article.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Do Take Note
Hello, i have reverted your edit on the article Goku in which you deleted the entire powers and abilities section. I reviewed the reason you provided which implied reference sources and inline citations weren't enough but haven taken time to observe the inline citations and references provided in the article i discovered they all summarize the entire section correctly. Now could it be editorial oversight on your part? or you didnt just bother to go through the sources provided?? Wikipedia is a collaborative project and any behaviour in sync with WP:OWN is also a feature of WP:NOTHERE and thus totally unaccetable. According to polices and guidelines governing this encylopedia you do not remove nor blank sections to prove a point, see WP:POINT especially when they are sourced or referenced. I noticed, re-occuring pattern of behaviour in your modus operandi pertaining to editing on here. Please do take note. However it may interest you to know that i have opened a section in the talk category of the page and before any adhoc extreme actions are carried out on that section, it is salient a discussion &/ conensus be observed. Celestina007 (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sort of driving by, but, like, based on what I can see, it's unfair to accuse Tintor of blanking to prove a point or of asserting ownership. In general, having a "Powers and abilities" section is often seen as too WP:INUNIVERSE for a character article. Any relevant powers and abilities should be integrated into the "Appearances" section. I have reviewed the section and Tintor is correct: at least 60% of the section is unsourced, and it is unwarranted and better integrated elsewhere. Having like six sentences sourced does not make the whole thing sourced. Please see some recently promoted articles of quality: Allen Walker, Yu Kanda, Lenalee Lee, Millennium Earl, Boruto Uzumaki, Naruto Uzumaki. Ability and powers sections ~Cheers,  Ten  Ton  Parasol  14:27, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * i do appreciate the work both you & have established on the encylopedia but nonetheless we are goverened by polices in this environment.
 * Now, you make mention of the section having few citations; well i need not remind you that is nonparaeil to include few citations that best represent a claim or text rather than an ugly citation cluster. see WP:Citation Overkill
 * Also having a powers and abilities section doesnt impede an articles chance of getting raised to GA status that is an unsubstantiated theory, furthermore it is not about the article rather my concerns relate to the behaviour of the editor. Blanking an entire section or page when it isnt an attack page or a made-up story is improper and we all know that. If it were a new/fresh editor he/she would probably be shaken and permanently quit wikipedia editing.
 * However on a jovial note i have rectified both problems indicated by The Superman vs Goku Death battle has been moved to the "Appearance section" and more inline citations have been added to the Powers and abilities section. Cheers.Celestina007 (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2
The article Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 05:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Sévérine
Hello again! I was wondering if you could possibly help me out on my current FAC for the article Sévérine? I understand either way, and I hope you have a great start to your week. Aoba47 (talk) 01:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Zero (Mega Man)
I'm sorry brother, but I have had to remove a red link as category is deleted and add a category on the Zero article because you have a red link in one of the categories until the category is deleted. 45.247.82.4 (talk) 16:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Good article reassessment/Jutsu (Naruto)/1
You are invited to join the discussion at Good article reassessment/Jutsu (Naruto)/1. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Sarada Uchiha
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Sarada Uchiha has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sarada Uchiha
The article Sarada Uchiha you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sarada Uchiha for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SaradaUchihasketch.png
Thanks for uploading File:SaradaUchihasketch.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Mitsuki
Hello! I've seen that you tagged me in a post regarding a draft for a possible Mitsuki article. I would be more than glad to help you with it! :D Just tell me in what ways you'd like me to contribute to it. Flowerpiep (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Flowerpiep

Boruto: Naruto the Movie
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Boruto: Naruto the Movie has been completed.

An issue came up that I could not resolve.


 * "Manga Entertainment released the movie in cinemas in the United Kingdom on November 10, 2015.[28] The same company released the home media release on June 5, 2017.[29] Licensed by Viz Media, its English language premiere was on February 19, 2017..."

The difference between what was released in English in 2015 and again in 2017 needs to be clarified. I couldn't figure it out from the references.

Also in the Critical response section I moved the following sentence which originally appeared toward the end of the section to the beginning because of chronology.


 * Prior to the film's release, Casey Baseel of Japan Today said that while fans might be worried the movie would focus on parenting issues, the trailer made it clear it would also focus on a new crisis which might appeal to them more.[36]

I think this is irrelevant and should be left out entirely. But, I leave that up to you.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Request for Help with Current FAC
Hello again! I hope that you are having a wonderful week so far. I was wondering if you could possibly help me with my current FAC? I have decided to return to the FAC process, but I went with projects that I feel be rather easy to put through the reviews in comparison to Sévérine. I would be more than happy to review anything in return for your help. Either way, good luck with your current work and your future projects. Aoba47 (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Sasuke Uchiha
Hello! :) I saw that you mentioned me. I definitely think the article regarding Sasuke should become FA and I would love to contribute to it. I looked over the article some time ago and made some changes. What could I further do to it? Flowerpiep (talk) 17:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Flowerpiep

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kei Kurono, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gonzo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kei_Kurono check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kei_Kurono?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Habilidades detectivescas
A ver cómo ando... vivís en San Fernando? ;) --uKER (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Tomo eso como un sí? Jajaj --uKER (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Kei Kurono
I've finished copy edit on Kei Kurono.

The image that you used in the infobox appears to be taken from a two-page pinup in Weekly Young Jump included with chapter 283 of the manga. I'm not sure if Jump owns the copyright, but you may wish to include the specific source with the file information.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to ping me. – Reidgreg (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
Thank you so much! Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! --122.108.141.214 (talk) 22:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SasukeUchihaPartII.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SasukeUchihaPartII.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

glad to be helpful
thanks for thanking me, I was wondering if you want join my wikia pretty soon. if so drop message or two on my page and I'll let you take a peek :) and have a nice new years Eliskuya2 (talk) 22:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Kiznaiver and Talk:Kiznaiver
You are invited to join the discussions at Talk:Kiznaiver and at Talk:Kiznaiver. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Silly me, I almost forgot to wish you a most Happy New Year. Thanks for being your amazing self on here as always. :') sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  02:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyo Kusanagi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cham Cham ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kyo_Kusanagi check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kyo_Kusanagi?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Sasuke Uchiha
Hello! :) Lately, I've seen that the Sasuke Uchiha article has been vandalized quite a few times by unregistered users. Shouldn't it become a semi-protected article in order to avoid similar future occurrences? Flowerpiep (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyo Kusanagi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatal Fury ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kyo_Kusanagi check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kyo_Kusanagi?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

GA nomination
Sorry I wasn't able to review Boruto: Naruto the Movie for you, I have only been able to make edits on Wikipedia here and there (busy week >.<). Let me know when you have another candidate and I will be happy to review it for you! =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Boruto: Naruto the Movie
You've done an amazing job as always! :) I wish I had logged in to Wikipedia earlier today in order to be able to help more, but I'm glad that it was a relatively easy pass. Flowerpiep (talk) 16:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep

Orphaned non-free image File:SarutobiSasuke.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SarutobiSasuke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LarsAlexanderssonVrede.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LarsAlexanderssonVrede.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Copy edit of Naruto:TSHATSS
Tintor2: I did a requested copy edit on Naruto: The Seventh Hokage and the Scarlet Spring. Here are my notes: Please me with your thoughts and I'll try to finish it off. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Naruto then remembers the time when Sasuke chose to start an important mission in order to protect everyone from an imminent threat. I'm not sure why this sentence is there. How does this fit in to the rest of the plot?
 * She is then teleported along with Shin in the latter's hideout. Could this be "to his hideout"?
 * The three voice actors behind the Uchiha family [...] revealed multiple thoughts about it, with the three expressing happiness at the same time due to the further characterization the characters they voice received. If the "multiple thoughts" they have are important, they should be stated specifically; if not, why mention it at all?  Or is this like saying they had "mixed thoughts" about the storyline?  Additionally, the "further characterization the characters they voiced" part is a bit awkward.  I wanted to be sure about the meaning before rephrasing it.  (I was unable to look up the source at this time.)

Too many GOCE requests
Tintor2, you currently have three active requests on the GOCE Requests page, but the limit there is two, as stated at in the rules at the top of the page. Please delete one of your requests; you can add it back at the bottom of the list once one of your requests is completed. (Since you have one being edited even now, it shouldn't take long.) Thank you for your cooperation. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Mitsuki (Naruto)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mitsuki (Naruto) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Carolwood Pacific Railroad FAC
When you have a moment, consider commenting on the FA review for the Carolwood Pacific Railroad article here: Featured article candidates/Carolwood Pacific Railroad/archive1. Jackdude 101 talk cont 15:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LarsAlex.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LarsAlex.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Sasuke FA
Hi, thanks for thinking of me. I think you've done an amazing job with the article, and I think it's very close to FA, given that Sasuke hasn't attracted the same level of critical attention as Naruto has. Unfortunately, I'm not sure I can be of any help in this situation. I was able to point out an omission on the first FAC for Naruto, but I would not describe grammar as being my strongest point and I have a major personal commitment starting tomorrow. Maybe Mike Christie could be asked to help with the copyedit? (He did with the main Naruto article.) --122.108.141.214 (talk) 06:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Regarding your question about extending the time: I know of no time limit of a month for a FAC (seem to remember longer ones), and think the delegates are able to see if an oppose is still valid after corrections have been made. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I've copyedited the critical-response section. Good luck with FA and all the best,  Mini  apolis  02:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm really not sure how to best advise you - even if this person does provide you with a trustworthy scan in a timely manner, it wouldn't be admissible as a source without the full and proper citation for it. What you have done on Sasuke's article is to make it a GA with an eye towards becoming FA - which is better than it only just being good enough to become a GA.  It can be difficult, too, when the problem is something like "sparkling prose" - which is a matter of taste.  --122.108.141.214 (talk) 02:44, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Keechaka Vadham/archive1
Hello, Tintor2. I have nominated my fifth FAC and second collaboration with. You peer reviewed this article back in March last year. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the FAC by pinging me. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

FAC reviewing barnstar
Thanks Mike. Also, I've been wondering if you could recheck Sasuke's FA nomination since the nominator copyedited it a lot. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:36, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I've posted a note at WT:FAC about it; it's not just your nomination that's the issue, it's a general question of how opposes should be handled. I will certainly revisit if a coordinator asks me to.  I don't know if I will otherwise.  Sorry to be unhelpful this time around; best of luck with the article in the future. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 01:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quid pro quo support
Hi Tintor, regarding the discussion at WT:FAC about perennial problems, I wonder if I could draw your attention to your quick support at Featured article candidates/All Souls (TV series)/archive1.

The nominator of that article supported your nomination, Featured article candidates/Sasuke Uchiha/archive1, and at 23:13, 28 January 2018, asked you to look at the All Souls FAC. You said at 00:33, 29 January 2018, that you would look at it the next day. Less than an hour later, at 01:12, 29 January 2018, you added a "quick support".

That kind of quid pro quo is something FAC has tried to avoid. It's fine to collaborate to improve each other's nominations, but that ought not to become "I've supported you; now go and support me." Otherwise the whole FAC process is pointless, and it puts the coordinators in the awkward position of having to decide whether to overlook certain supports. SarahSV (talk) 22:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * SarahSV. I see. I'm not looking for supports but comments on FACs. What kind of bothered me though was the direct opposes that people added over a month of comments which involved prose issues. I don't mind if opposers wanted me to rewrite some parts to make the in-universe information easier to understand but the prose issues are out of my hands. Still, I doubt I might touch another FAC.Tintor2 (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Tintor, I'm talking here about your support for All Souls (TV series). You made a "quick support" after someone supported your nom and asked you to look at hers. That kind of "support swapping" makes supports worthless. It means coordinators have to seek other views. So if you do continue to review at FAC, please don't add any more quick supports because someone supported you, or because you hope they will support you. SarahSV (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I see. I'll be careful with other nominations. It's just that I wasn't too familiar with tv articles.Tintor2 (talk) 23:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Okay, thank you. If you're not familiar with a topic and don't have time to become more familiar, it's best not to comment on it. If someone asks you to comment in exchange for a support, you could say something like "Thanks for your support, but I'd prefer to keep that separate from any reviews I do." And if that means they don't support yours, and you think there's a link (e.g. they've said they'll support but then change their minds), alert one of the coordinators, or.


 * People who expect "supports for supports" shouldn't be FAC reviewers. But there may be reviewers who believe that it's the norm because they sees others doing it, so it's important that we start telling reviewers that it's frowned on. SarahSV (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)