User talk:TinyEFH

Welcome!
Hello, TinyEFH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dr. Vincent Giampapa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Electric Catfish 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Dr. Vincent Giampapa


The article Dr. Vincent Giampapa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Electric Catfish 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Life Science Institute


A tag has been placed on Life Science Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the page that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ubelowme U Me  03:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Dэя-Бøяg 07:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 08:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * To demonstrate sufficient notability for Dr. Vincent Giampapa, we would need reliable third party sources talking about him in a non-trivial way - have a look at WP:RS for what we accept as such sources. The doctor's own writings constitute primary sources (see WP:PRIMARY) and are not sufficient to satisfy our notability requirements - they can be probably used to reference specific article content, but only if independent sources can also be provided which attest to notability. It is all pretty much explained at WP:N and WP:RS. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The fact that you state you intend to edit on behalf of someone else, presumably the subject of the article or his employing authority, is a significant problem; this is generally speaking not allowed in wikipedia. Let us be realistic; to create a wikipedia account does not take very much technical knowledge, asnd creating an article takes even less. If someone you know wants an article to be here, tell them to do it themselves.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

For what it's worth, If you really want to edit, I'd suggest you seek a mentor or the standard offer. Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 14:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)