User talk:Tiocfaidh Ár Lá

Hello, You should log in as your old username to confirm that the edit of the old userpage was valid. -- Curps 19:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

will do--Tiocfaidh Ár Lá! 19:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

done--Anti-establishment 19:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Celtic_Roy_Keane.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Celtic_Roy_Keane.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 11:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Fair use Images
Thanks for the heads up on the username thing, too much playing with my browser me thinks! You might want to double check, policy number 9 86.12.245.194 12:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Thought for the Day
"And while Ireland holds these graves, Ireland ... shall never be at peace."

So maybe its time to let them go. Fergananim 11:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

"Ireland unfree shall never pe at peace, and maybe it's not --Tiocfaidh Ár Lá! 16:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)"

Since holding onto past-their-sell-by-date ideas and dead people has brought neither freedom nor peace to some, perhaps its time to forget them as we have other irrelevant dogmas, and live in the here and now. Just an idea .. Fergananim 16:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

For example: United Ireland. What's the point? The last nail in that coffin was hammered home ninty years ago, so why flog a dead horse?

If you have any other ideas that you think are still relevant, however, try me. I do listen with an open mind. Cheers, and thanks for the message. Fergananim 16:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough; though note that the rise in votes was in direct proportion to the decrease in voilent PIRA activity. Also, that there is very little substance between SF of, say, 1981, and the policys they espouse now. There won't be a United Ireland, sadly, because there is no good reason for it, and the leadership knows it too. Fergananim 16:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

An absense of PIRA violence doesn't mean there is peace, it just means the PIRA is not active, but you are right in the fact that there is a direct correlation. But is there peace? I say no, If there was then peace lines would be ripped down, but that's not going to happen. Look at Dublin on Saturday, the smallest thing can trigger massive riots (think marching season), what we have isn't peace. Yes SF have changed since '81, they compete in elections (I'm not a shinner by the way), they (SF/IRA) have helped end the Unionist hegemony, made sectarianism in employment all but extinct and have sat on a power-sharing executive. Things have improvewd no doubt, but to say there is no good reason for a United Ireland is complete and utter bollocks.

Ireland is a small island with a small population, and a small fraction think they're the Queens favourite people on Earth which means a border was conjured up to divide it. Ireland was divided in ancient times, then a single entity for centureies, it will be united again somehow. Britain is all too keen to leave thie North, North-South programmes are greater in number, the leadership of SF know this and know that real politics is now just as effective as bombs were. A very large minority in the 6 counties are not British, Irish passport applications are going across the border like never before. Unionism has been on the back-foot for almost 40 years and all they are doing now are silly delaying tactics. --Tiocfaidh Ár Lá! 17:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Very good points, and well stated. However, Ireland was never in its history united as a single, soverign Irish political entity. Would that it were so. In any case, what say do we in Ireland have on the idea of suddenly expanding our state by bringing in the north? Its not a terribly popular idea down here. The main obstacle to a united Ireland will be neither of the peoples of the North, but the Irish. Fergananim 17:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

"we in Ireland"? Pardon me but isn't Ireland an island? I think I live on it....

And I never stated it was ever a united sovereign entity, just that it was a single entity. And the free-staters in the South might not be overly-excited about the prospect, but real Republicans are, I'm not overly excited about being ruled in a capitalist country with Dublin as it's capital and PD's in govt (Just as bad as London in many respects). I just want to see Britain leave first and foremost, then a solution on unity, whether it be a confederation, a federation - whatever. I'm a socialist, my ideal Ireland would be a 32 county workers republic, or something near it. If I was offered a free "Northern Ireland" based on socialist principles I would take it, then work towards unity.

Well thats my 5 minute roundabout path to unity, thats why I'm not a politician. --Tiocfaidh Ár Lá! 20:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

O Keane Arms
Just one other question; any idea which O Keane the arms were granted to? Cheers. Fergananim 16:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Pretty sure the Keane clan is is from the south east, there is a variant of kane that is keane, but most are found in the south coast area. The Keane coat of arms, I have no idea.

Please do not add copyvio material to the pedia
Please do not tag images like and  as GFDL, when it is clear that you copied them from random websites. This is using false tags, and you will be blocked if you continue. Thanks for your attention. JesseW, the juggling janitor 03:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Or [[Image:Celtic Roy Keane.jpg]]. JesseW, the juggling janitor 03:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Gaelic Games
Hi, i have noticed that you have previously edited articles related to the subject of Gaelic Games. Several users, including my self, have start work on a WikiProject to collaborate and pool our work on the subject to create, expand and improve listings about Gaelic Games and related subjects. With your previous edits i was wondering if you would be willing to join us and help out in this project. Their is no commitment necessary, and you can assists the project as your time permits. If your interested you can check out the project at WikiProject Gaelic Games, and if you have any questions about the project feel free to drop a line on the project talk page, or you can drop me a line directly. Thank you, and i look forward to your assistance. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 08:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Well becides myself, their is one other user, Gnevin that is on board. I have invited editors that have made edites to the artiles in question, ones that have added content or their edits seem to express an intrest in the subject, but the question is if they will join or not. I have also posted notices on some internal boards, inviting useres to help out. Usually these things take a bit to ramp up, and if no one joins well i am still going to go ahead, at least it will be an area that editors can colarbate on a subject that is going to have a variety of artilces. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 04:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The GaelicGamesProject tag should only applied to the talk pages of articials (Gnevin 21:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC))
 * Yeah i was gonna say the same thing, most of the major articlea are tagged, if you happen to come across one that does not have one on the talk page, just payt the tag their. Thanks for tagging the articles though. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 03:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Re:Project
Well i am less concerned about finding images then adding txt to the artciles, ie history, background, and such. But the images do not hurt. As for the set, yeah image use on here is not well coridnated nor is it well explaind, they really need a copyright laywer to come in and flesh it out then trhying to do one thing and say another, but that is an ither discussion. The images could be used off of fair use provisions, tag it wil something like Non-free fair use in, but it would be bset to try to seek the permission of the holder of the images and get them to release the usage to wikipedia. If your going to fair use its best only to use one of the image, mulitple from the same source can invaladate fair use, and the only image that i would not use of them is the first one, being that it from another source, Daily Ireland, and not the Ulster board, that just adds another issue. As for images though, i rahther have good mages in articles, then crap images, other wise it does not add value to the article or to image. Just my thoughts. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 03:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Vote on Britain
Just thought you'd like to know that on the Talk:Britain page there is a vote. The vote is to redirect Britain to Great Britain. Those who disagree with the redirect are doing so because, they contend, the northeast of Ireland is part of Britain (and not merely just part of the UK). El Gringo 21:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Irish History
You seem like you have a lot a knowledge with respect Irish history so maybe you would like to comment on the historic basis of this term here Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-02 IRA 'Volunteer' usage —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DownDaRoad (talk • contribs) 20:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC).

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Antrim crest.gif, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 08:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

IRA Volunteer issue
Go to this page, an Indian guy is being forced by Loyalists and West Brit who are demanding that the rank of Volunteer is banned for describing the rank of members of the IRA – if you do not voice your opinion on this then they are going to get away with this bull Vintagekits 22:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

"Tiocfa(í|i)dh Ár Lá"
Why is your sig spelt Tiocfaídh Ár Lá instead of Tiocfaidh Ár Lá? jnestorius(talk) 17:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The end of the mediation cabal on the term Volunteer is ending in two days.
The mediation process is ending in two days - you have two days to have you final say and 1. show any proof that Volunteer is a rank and 2. leave your final vote in coming to a consensus here. Thank you.--Vintagekits 22:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject IRA
Hi Tiocfaidh, I thought you might be interested in have a look at WikiProject Irish Republican Army. We've got a few interested users, though collaboration has yet to come. Anyway, have a look! If you're interested, go ahead and slap your name on the Participants list! Hope to see you there!  Erin Go Bragh talk 10:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC) p.s. I love your Ulster poster.

April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rangers F.C., you will be blocked from editing. Archibald99  15:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Donegal.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Donegal.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/The Bhoys from Seville
Thank you for your contribution on the above AfD. Your time and effort is much appriciated. regards--Vintagekits 01:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Antrim crest.png
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Antrim crest.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bifhe.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bifhe.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 17:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Feilefm103.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Feilefm103.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:FrostWire.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FrostWire.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Antrim crest.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Antrim crest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Antrim crest.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Antrim crest.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Antrim crest.png
Thank you for uploading File:Antrim crest.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)