User talk:Tiparrish

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Tiparrish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for EXploreBot. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 00:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of EXploreBot


The article EXploreBot has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * orphaned. no assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marcus  Qwertyus   04:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Janie Settles Johnson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janie Settles Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Janie Settles Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 08:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Chobham 2.0 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chobham 2.0 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chobham 2.0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Tiparrish for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. --MelanieN (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, TP, and sorry for the canned notice above. It looks as if the person who asked for this investigation failed to notify you about it. What this means is that they are asking for an investigation into whether the two brand-new accounts who posted at Articles for deletion/Janie Settles Johnson are really just you under a different name. That's called using a sockpuppet and it is frowned upon. You have every right to respond to this but do read the above link ("guide to responding to cases") first. --MelanieN (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Chobham 2.0 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chobham 2.0. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Chobham 2.0 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Max Viwe &#124;  Viwe The Max  08:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:Chobham 2.0 with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Chobham_2.0&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cheers, Riley Huntley  (Click here to reply)   14:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Help
Hello, Tiparrish.I just saw what you asked here at Help_desk. I know that you must be feeling exhausted about the Sock-puppet investigation on going.I must say that you should not worry if your are completely innocent.No actions would be taken against you in such situation.Don't feel worried.If you needed any kind of help on Wikipedia, You can contact me or any other editor on the talk page. Max Viwe &#124;  Viwe The Max  15:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)