User talk:Tipheus

Welcome!

 * }

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Magic Flute's Second Part has been reverted. Your edit here to The Magic Flute's Second Part was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Un8BMCJV75A) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)


 * On the same subject as the message above: I do know that Papageno has siblings in Winter's opera – I've read the English and German Wikipedia articles. However, that does not prove who the figures on the Papagenotor are. See also my remarks at de:Diskussion:Theater an der Wien.
 * As for the manner of your revert:, as I indicated in the edit summary, was about more than the description of the Papageno Gate; your revert rudely did not take any account of my other improvements. Such editing is considered pointy, disruptive and uncivil. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)