User talk:Tiptoety/Archive 3

Userboxes
sry yeah i did ill take them off if u want me 2 (i just thought they wer cool and wanted them on my utterly empty user page Flaminglawyer 23:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC) btw u shuld take off the 1 that says u want 2b an admin but r 2 afraid 2 submit urself (seeing as you are already an admin) Flaminglawyer 23:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, that is fine, you may keep them, just next time you should ask a user before you copy their userboxes, as some may not like it. You should check out Wikipedia:Userboxes and go to the gallery section, there are thousands of userboxes there to choose from, Cheers! User:Tiptoety 23:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

150.101.184.205
I see we both warned 150.101.184.205 about the same time. I've reported him to the Administrators against Vandalism page. Keep up the good work. -- ZeWrestler  Talk 23:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, we warned him for two different times. And thank you for reporting him, keep up the good work! Tiptoety 23:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * He was blocked for a month -- ZeWrestler  Talk 04:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Great! Tiptoety 04:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar, I do find that welcoming does do a lot of good, there have even been studies done; is one of them. Have a good day! Phgao 03:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I add that you are doing a fine job yourself with the RC patrol and warnings! Hopefully my welcoming reduces the amount of new user testing/vandalism. Phgao 03:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Y4kk 14:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Diff. It's not 3RR if you're reverting obvious blanking vandalism, as Ty was doing. The anon editor was reported at AIV and blocked. Thanks. Katr67 18:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * My reverts were reverting vandalism, and did not violate the 3RR rule as Katr67 stated above. Also it is not a good idea to Template the Regulars, and next time a simple personalized message may be a better idea, thank you for trying to stop vandalism, your contributions are greatly appreciated! Tiptoety 18:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Ideas for "Addicted"
I looked at both music articles and I pretty much know how the article will be structured once it is created. Still, I have not read the rules that you posted because you archived them, and yes I am a lazy person. (Sorry!) Also, I apologize again for the three weeks of not responding in your talk page. I had so much homework and other projects and I am already doing bad on only one of my classes. Sincerely, Bull Borgnine 19:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC).


 * Done! XD Next step? Bull Borgnine 19:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Favor (Separate)
Thank you for understanding! I hope you do not mind if I ask you for a favor. See the warning a user posted on my page? Can you replace my fair use rationale with a fair use rationale box (which I do not how to create) and add iTunes Store as the source for the cover? I would really appreciate it and I hope it is not a big hassle! Bull Borgnine 19:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

WPOR CoTW: Don Schollander & Conde McCullough
Greetings WPOR world. Last week was great with the Barlow Road seeing lots of improvement, maybe even B class. Columbia River Plateau also saw some improvement, maybe enough to bump it to Start. On with the countdown, another two Stubs in the High category, both happen to be people: Don Schollander a multi-gold medalist; and then world-renowned bridge architect and all-around swell guy Conde McCullough. Schollander needs sources more than anything, and McCullough needs more of a bio, plus maybe a nice chart for the bridges with type/year/location/length. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. This week’s safety tip, stranger=danger. Aboutmovies 18:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Thank you for the Barnstar. It's very much appreciated. F-402 01:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You are welcome! Tiptoety 01:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

HOW ARE YOU THEN? HOW DID YOU KNOW SO QUICKLY WHAT I WAS DOING

Barnstar

 * Thank you! Tiptoety 02:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

your welcome
your welcome

your welcomeNooblet4 23:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

your welcomeNooblet4 23:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Rudy and the Gays
Do you know why the Rudy and the Gays page has been removed and blocked from recreation? thanks Nooblet4 23:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This was not copied and reposted. I would just like to know about Rudy and the Gays. Thanks Nooblet4 23:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I am aware of that thank you! :) Tiptoety 23:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The name of the article was Rudy and the Gays. Thank you for your help. it will be remembered. Nooblet4 23:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * A friend of a friend told me to look at it. No big deal. How are barnstars created? Nooblet4 23:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

barnstar

 * Thank you! Tiptoety 23:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

User page
You said you could help me set up a user page? that would be greatly appreciated. Nooblet4 23:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * i dont really even know where to start. Nooblet4 00:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks but no thanks. this is way to confusing. i really appreciate the help though. Sorry if i was a nuicance. Nooblet4 00:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * My incompetance no fault of yours. Wikipedia is a lot easier to valnalize than to actually try and work. Although i am sure it is fairly easy to delete vandalisms. again thank you for all of your help but i do not think i have the computer skill or atention span to continue creating my user page. Nooblet4 00:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * On the subject of vandalism (dont worry i am not planning on any vandalism), how do the admins know that a user is a sock puppet of another user? Nooblet4 00:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I am no sockpuppet, although i still would like to know what that article was about. I guess i will just have to wait untill tomorrow. Nooblet4 00:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I will see my friend tomorrow and he can tell me what was on it. Nooblet4 00:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Why did you delete my talk page? Nooblet4 00:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandal alert
Hi. I did leave a warning on that user's talk page, the one responsible for that "Bassgrabbing" nonsense. It's apparent he isn't here to do anything except get his yuks. - PMDrive1061 01:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * But that does not justify the user being blocked. Tiptoety 01:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

I never called for him to be blocked. I merely warned him about the consequences of adding nonsense. Looks like there was a legitimate article to redirect to, so we at least have a good redirect out of all this. Somehow though, I'm still certain that he isn't going to be making any groundbreaking edits to the quantum physics article. :) - PMDrive1061 01:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, well WP:AIV is used to report users so they can be blocked. Not just users that have vandalized. Tiptoety 01:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Gotcha. Didn't mean to imply something out of policy. Thanks for the help. NPP used to drive me nuts, but it's difficult to add new content during lulls here at work. So, off to slay the vandals! - PMDrive1061 01:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 

has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


 * Glad to do it. :)  You betcha I'll give a yell if I need anything.  I no longer have admin status under my old username, but that's how I wanted it.  My choice, I'm pleased to say.  Thanks again.  PMDrive1061 02:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Yup. I was an admin.  I had users threaten me with requests for comment all the time.  One guy simply took it too far.  He wrote some silly, Urban Dictionary-style dictionary definition, which I deleted and which has remained deleted, I might add.  Guy flew off the freaking handle and tried running me up on charges.  Vandals started smelling blood because of it.  Every deletion I made was generally followed up with hassles from the vandals about how "abusive" I was.  This just egged the original user on.  I told the user in no uncertain terms what I thought of him and his request for comment and folded it in.  I later asked a bureaucrat on the live Wikia help room to de-admin me, which he did.  I swore I'd never come back.  In fact, I've been gone for about thirteen of the last nineteen months.  Nevertheless, here I am.  I don't know what I'll do at this point.  It's starting to suck up my free time during the day and interfere with my work at night. - PMDrive1061 07:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I wasn't unaware of it at all. I'd merely forgotten about it.  If memory serves, it was a fairly new procedure when I was playing "whack-a-vandal" and one I never took advantage of.  Most of my reversions were taken directly from new page patrolling.  Before I was an admin, I'd simply paste warnings on talk pages, much like now.  Any chronic vandalism got reported to the administrator's noticeboard or to an administrator's talk page.  In short, I don't recall having used it at all and I'd forgotten about it.  I hope this satisfies your curiosity and I don't blame you for being skeptical in light of all the sockpuppetry and other nonsense that goes on.  Tell you what:  I can sign in under my old account, leave word with you here right now and you can feel free if you wish have a bureaucrat run a checkuser on me. - PMDrive1061 16:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Here I am! Took me a moment to remember the password, but the account's still active.  I hope this helps. --Lucky 6.9 16:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * And here I am again. :)  You can check the "Lucky 6.9" edit history to see that I really did edit your page. - PMDrive1061 16:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ Tiptoety 23:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use
Regarding this image, the only page it could justifiable be on under a fair use rationale is the article on OSP. It cannot simply be decorational on a list, if you wanted to re-add it to the Oregon law enforcement list. If you want to add it to the OSP page, just add it and then edit the picture page and write: this is a low resolution logo used only on the article that provides commentary about the logo owner's entity. If you want to decorate the list, try the police car picture or maybe try to find a "free" picture of a statepolice station/trooper/aircraft, etc. Hope that helps. Aboutmovies 02:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Tiptoety 18:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiOregon COTW
Greetings once again WikiProject Oregon members. Thank you to those who help out with improving Conde McCullough and Don Schollander last week. This week is a Stub break, with a Ref improvement drive for Oregon and a request for work on Portland Police Bureau. For the ref improvement, this means sourcing tagged statements and standardizing all existing citations, both of which are needed for GA and FA status. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Aboutmovies 18:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Block rationale
He (or she?) added a half-dozen sockpuppet tags to userpages before being blocked. Blocks are preventative, not punitive, and the point was to prevent disruptive editing like that. I think that block is expired (or will be shortly) so I'm not sure what's left to say. Cheers, Wily D 00:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you!Tiptoety 00:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Rest assured I have more useful things to do than thank others (not sure what I'm supposed to be thanking them for, anyway) – Gurch 00:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Brasileiro1993
Why do you keep trying to delete a legit article about a real person of importance. Ben doVale is person of value ,not some slocky who runs around throwing CFID or what ever ther called.
 * Because it does not meet policy. Take a look at WP:BIO]. Tiptoety 00:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Benjamin doVale is a person worthy of notice, he has been featured in the Oregonian on several occasions, has been interviewed on the local news network several times.

Laugardagslögin 2008
why are you trying to delete the Laugardagslögin 2008 page, it is a page about the Iceandic TV show Laugardagslögin 2008, which is a song contest, and the winners will represent Iceland in eurovision. I had wrote 12 words and tried to make a table, but before i could do the first table you tried to delete it, why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zibjah (talk • contribs) 22:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Smile!
has smiled at you! Smiles are good! and hopefully this one has made your day better. Why not smile at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend? Happy editing!
 * Thank you! Tiptoety 18:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

My RFA
Thanks for voting on my RFA! Although ultimately it was unsuccessful, I do appreciate the feedback. As to some of the issues you raised - for the rush thing- I want to quickly again apologize - I kind of ranted in that area because so many people had brought up what I thought was a fairly innocuous answer to a question. And as to the "backing out" - I completely agree in that an admin needs to stand their ground, and this was my own fault in that I did not phrase the answer to the question in the best way, however I was referring to the situations covered by WP:BITE and WP:IGNORE. As to the AIV thing - the lack of edits to AIV are primarily because I would typically not block users. In the same way that some users only edit articles and some users only add images - as an admin I probably wouldn't try to do everything - I would only use the tools that could best help me serve the encyclopedia (i.e. deletion and page protection). Again, thank you very much for your vote - and I will definitely strive to further my experience here at WP and gain your support next time - I might even try out AIV :). Thanks again!-- daniel folsom  21:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You are welcome, and no worries for "ranting" about the rush issue as i did not consider it a rant, but instead a user who was standing their ground and defending themselves and i think that is a good thing. I think that you have proven that you would as an admin stand your ground (as you proved it in your RfA). I hope that you do give WP:AIV a try as it can further your experience with admin tasks, and if you have any questions regarding it i would be glad to help. Gain some more experience, and try again in a few months and i would be happy to vote support! Thanks again! Keep up the good work! Tiptoety 22:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: Smile

 * Thanks! Gscshoyru 23:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

??
I only deleted trolling. Look at the case exactly.--23:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately i did look at the case exactly, and that is why i chose to revert it. Thank you for bringing your concern to my attention. Tiptoety 23:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!
Thanks for the help with that Vandal.--Mike Searson 23:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcome! Tiptoety 00:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not a vandal. Vandals are half-wits. I have taken a good look at the article, and having reviewed all the discussion sincerely believe that the article in question falls WAY short of the standards expected, and the usual protocols have manifestly failed in this case. Call me a lazy editor if you like, or call me a bold one, but vandal is a bit strong! When are the moderators going to earn some respect from the rank and file on this one by deleting or pruning the article in question? Excalibur 00:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Collaboration of the Week
Howdy doody ya’ll WPOR poke, time for more COTW. Thanks for the work on Portland Police Bureau and improving the references at Oregon. This week we are back to Stubs with Eastern Oregon and Fort Vancouver National Historic Site. Both need just a little TLC to make it to Start. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Aboutmovies 01:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sar123.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sar123.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ Tiptoety 04:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Tiptoety 15:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism Efforts
From my own talk page: Did you really mean WP:VP, or did that have to be WP:VPRF? Regardless, both are usefull links, that i will certainly read top to bottom. Also, thanks a lot for your compliment. Im glad that im being usefull around here :) -- Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 18:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I would like to let you know that you are doing a very good job with your anti-vandal efforts, you have not been here long and already left an impression. Ever consider using WP:VP? Tiptoety 18:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * oops. My bad, yes i meant WP:VPRF, but WP:VP is a good page to read up on as well. And you are welcome, keep up the good work! Tiptoety

Editor Review
Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Editor review/, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Tiptoety 20:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: Mediation
I would like to comment, but I am not sure of which section I would add one to, and since I am not an "involved party" I didn't know if I could comment. Can you explain that to me? - Rjd0060 05:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I have left a comment. Thanks.  I hope that Jeeny thinks about this situation and decides to come back.  - Rjd0060 05:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Tiptoety 05:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Turned out well? I supposed it did, other than the fact that a good editor has left. - Rjd0060 06:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that part is not good, but the conflict has stopped instead of getting larger. Not all party's can have the outcome they want (un-fortnightly). I think that Jeeny will ultimately come back to the pedia. Tiptoety 06:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. Thanks for all of your work in this situation as well. - Rjd0060 06:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I did try, but withdrew my nomination about 10 hours later. A few people commented, and all suggested the same thing to improve on.  I will try again in a couple months. - Rjd0060 06:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good! Be sure to let me know when you try again! Tiptoety 06:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL. I wouldn't want to canvass, but I appreciate your comment.  You'll just have to keep an eye out for me. - Rjd0060 06:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea i know..... ;)  I will keep my eye out for you! Tiptoety 06:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Good job catching that one, you passed your test, lol. Tiptoety

SPAM ala COTW
Ladies and Gentlemen its time for another episode of Collaboration of the Week. Last week’s show starring Fort Vancouver National Historic Site & Eastern Oregon received high ratings. This week’s show star two more stubs, Johnny Kitzmiller & John Wesley Davis. As always, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Don’t delay, act today! Aboutmovies 18:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

CSD G1 for user pages
Yes, CSD G1 can apply to a user page. The general CSD criteria (G1 through G12) "apply to all namespaces", including (but not limited to) articles, talk pages, templates, images and user pages. Is there a specific deletion you wanted an opinion on? Cheers, Caknuck 06:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * In the case of User:Abraby‎, I'd say this probably does not qualify for a CSD G1 deletion. Not being an expert on Tamil (Tamil Nadu is a province in India) names, my best guess is that the text indicates the user's name and hometown, which would imply a specific meaning and thus would exclude it from being "patent nonsense". There appear to be no other violations of WP:USER or other relevant policies, so the page is fine by me.


 * If CSD G1 is cited when deleting user pages, it's usually cases of vandalism clean-up (fake user pages created by vandals are uncommon, but do show up from time to time, in which CSD G3 may also apply) or during the periodic clean up of the user and user talk pages for abandoned accounts (in which case, CSD G6 can also be used). Generally, if an editor is actively making positive contributions to the encyclopedia, harmless and/or nonsensical user pages are left alone.


 * Again, let me know if you have any further questions or concerns, Caknuck 08:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Empezardesdecero123
Thanks for the info. I already went to the page and apologized for my ill behavior. Thank you, again!Empezardesdecero123 02:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, thank you! Tiptoety 02:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Here's the link. If he apologized, that's fine. I was just disturbed overall. JuJube 03:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I had made up those usernames. They do not exsist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empezardesdecero123 (talk • contribs) 22:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

So when is your Rfa?
The thread title says it all. I've been noticing you more and more around the Wiki, and hope you will stand for Admin soon. You seem to have a good grasp of policy, common sense, and a good heart. It would be a pleasure to support you. Jeffpw 10:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You're watchlisted now, so when you do decide the time is right, I'll chime right in let the community know we need another good admin:-P. BY the way, I read your last Rfa and looked through your contributions. I dare say you'll pass with flying colors on the next nomination. Jeffpw 15:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I think you should be an admin too! You'd do a GREAT job! Suprise! 

has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * Thanks! Tiptoety 23:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey, thanks!


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --Bookworm857158367 11:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Tiptoety 14:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks, Tiptoety, for the heads up regarding my AN/I report. TimidGuy 15:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

RE:User:Jeeny
I've sent her an email a couple days ago, and didn't receive any reply. Hopefully she'll check in sometime. Thanks. - Rjd0060 19:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

RE:Email
I am going to reply to your email momentarily as this conversation needs to happen privately. - Rjd0060 22:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. Tiptoety 22:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I talked to a steward too, and they said to go to ANI. Can you do that? - Rjd0060 23:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * OK. I am going to be here, and I'll follow up on the report you make.  Thanks - Rjd0060 23:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I emailed you with the info. Jeffpw 23:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

user sentriclecub
My page was deleted on a chess variation arising from the dutch-leningrad defense opening. I only saved the page so I could preview it, i wasn't done. I read wikipedia's FAQ for first-time-users and was following the guidelines. Sentriclecub 22:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * replied on Sentriclecub's talk page Tiptoety 23:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks! That's my first compliment. 2 Questions.

Empezardesdecero123 22:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Can I delete all the warnings off my page?
 * Where do you get all those coll things for your page??
 * OK, but how do i archive them. They are ugly!Empezardesdecero123 22:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I did that! Could you please go to my talk page and check out my archives to see if i did it correctly?Empezardesdecero123 23:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey! Who's your adoptee?? Empezardesdecero123 23:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Cool. I signed up to get an adoptee! Empezardesdecero123 23:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW, how do i get a wikimood??Empezardesdecero123 23:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * How many do I need?Empezardesdecero123 23:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops! I guess i will have to wait a while! I'm gonna take myself off! TNX! How embarrasing!Empezardesdecero123 23:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Im gonna have to make 413 more edits! BTW, where do I get a wikimood?Empezardesdecero123 23:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I don't mind at all.Empezardesdecero123 21:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

RE:Barnstar
Thanks for the barnstar. A sigh of relief. Good work on your part as well. - Rjd0060 00:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank You!
Hi, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page, I had no idea that 24.226.XXX.X was on my user page. Maybe I should start one of those vandalism counters on my page! Ha. :) -BlueAmethyst .:*:. 01:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

ANI and thread archiving
Hi Tiptoety. This is why it is always suggested to archive/close discussions when people seem to calm down and went to bed ;) Now they woke up and came to argue about something that no admin would sort out. Thanks. -- FayssalF  -  Wiki me up®  09:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * My bad, thanks for the message! Tiptoety 14:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you so much, Tiptoey, for the Barnstar you left for me. Of all the ones I ahve, I think this one has the most meaning attached to it. I will place it with pride at the top of my page! Thank you as well for all you did regarding Jeeny. Without your extraordinary initiative, we would all have just sat and worried. Thanks to you we know what's going on. Jeffpw 22:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcome! Tiptoety 00:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

RE:Yes, another Barnstar!
..I'll take it! Thanks. What can I say, I'm having a good night. CYA! - Rjd0060 05:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL. Well, I'm gonna call it a day here pretty soon. - Rjd0060 05:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Most of my reverts tonight were from Special:Contributions/Straightway. Over 50 in about a half hour, which is why I got this barnstar shortly before you gave me the other one. - Rjd0060 05:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. - Rjd0060 05:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for dropping me a notice, it seems fine to me. (The coincidence that was found at the end of the tread somewhat interesting). Maybe it's a Halloween thing :) Best, -- B figura (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I am hoping it is just a Halloween thing. Tiptoety 05:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Your note
I'm thinking you're right, especially with this guy. Probably someone who had beef with them before and doesn't realize they're gone, don't you think? delldot  talk  06:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * JzG's not actually retired, for the record - he's still active (note the strikethrough on the 're' in the banner). But I do agree that there's a bunch of sleeper accounts that are surfacing right now. I requested full protection for a short time to see if they get bored - not sure if it'll be approved, though, as it is a talk page. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * True, but I'd almost rather leave it unprotected as bait for the sleepers. I mean, I'd rather have them vandalizing that one page so we can catch and block them than have to find out who they are and which pages they're going to.  To me, they're not doing much harm if they're just going after that page, we know to watch it. Plus it's a user talk page, so that could be annoying to genuine users.   But if someone else wants to protect it that's cool.  delldot   talk  06:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm with you :) delldot   talk  06:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * No prob, thanks for the heads up on it. Peace,  delldot   talk  07:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Possible image deletion warning
Image:MCSO.jpg has no sources and no fair use rationale. Please add these, or the image will be deleted. --Agüeybaná  19:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea, sorry about that, i was at school/lunch and was unable to add fair use rational/source. Have done so now. Cheers! Tiptoety 21:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Admin Nomination
Thought you'd like to know that many people support you, including me! I said this about you. "I am sure Tiptoety will be a great admin. He works hard to make Wikipedia a good place! He has made many vandals turn into better people. Including me. He taught me how to make Wikipedia a better place. I totally support Tiptoety!" Good Luck!Empezardesdecero123 23:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support. Tiptoety 23:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Any day for a friend! Empezardesdecero123 23:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It appears your adminship nomination is derailing. If you'd like to discuss this, please feel free to leave me a message. Jeffpw 14:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I have posted again on the nomination page, reaffirming my support for you as an administrator. Should this not go forward, do keep trying, and I'll have some suggestions for you (including letting me nominate or co-nominate you in the future!) Jeffpw 14:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)