User talk:Tiptopper

A tag has been placed on Hawks Baseball Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. •  nancy  • 18:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on William Leonidas Mayo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. •  nancy  • 18:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 12:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Beta Beta Beta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  22:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Patrick A. Reid
You participated in this AfD, the validity of which now is being questioned at DRV here. Please consider participating in the DRV discussion. -- Jreferee    t / c  07:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Your edit
Hi, please return to User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me and move your comment to the talk page. Benjiboi 01:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Close! But not quite. Take it off that page altogether and click on the "Discussion" link on the upper left-hand side which is the "talk" page. You'll even see a link there to "Add section". Benjiboi 11:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Missing article
Hi Tiptopper. I could not locate any edit history for the page you refer to. If you have any trouble creating such an article, please let me know. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Double redirect
You created a double redirect when you created Microphonies as a redirect to Microphonies, when the target was in fact Micro-Phonies. Double redirects don't work, and so are considered a bad thing. No harm done, though. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Camel toes"
A page you created, Camel toes, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Oliver202 (talk) 15:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Smile's PRID
A tag has been placed on Smile's PRID, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fatal!ty (T☠LK) 11:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Hartford Meetup: We need your help!
The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!
The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Paul George
I agree that the main Paul George article should not be focused on the Canadian environmentalist. However, it should be a disambiguation page listing the various Paul George articles rather than a redirect to any particular Paul George (such as the basketball individual you linked to).

Unfortunately, by creating a new page named Paul George (environmentalist) copying the content of the original article rather than using Wikipedia’s “Move” function, the edit history for the article did not get associated with the new page. In future, please use the “Move” command (found in the menu to the left of the search box at the top of the page) instead of copying and pasting article content like this.

—GrantNeufeld (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Suicide Pin,


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Suicide Pin,. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History of suicide. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of suicide - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Singularity42 (talk) 17:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Devil dogs


The article Devil dogs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Nothing valuable, all content duplicated by Drake's. Perhaps redirect to The Devil Dogs?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe S chmedley Talk 22:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * By the way sorry if I sounded a bit harsh. I did nominate this article for deletion, though; you can comment on it. Joe S chmedley Talk 03:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 09:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Smith


A tag has been placed on Dr. Smith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgpaulus (talk) 21:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael A. McLachlan


The article Michael A. McLachlan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. JTtheOG (talk) 01:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I cleaned up the article. I noticed that is was largely copied from votesmart.org. In the future, please contribute prose to Wikipedia in your own words and don't forget to cite reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Neena Beber for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neena Beber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Neena Beber until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 04:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sansa apple
Hello Tiptopper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sansa apple for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nsk92 (talk) 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Don't vandalize
Please don't vandalize pages like you did here. Your edit summary suggests you know your edit was disruptive.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

September 2017
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page DD. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should: Thank you. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
 * Only add a " red link " if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references

Your contributed article, Route 91 harvest festival shooting


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Route 91 harvest festival shooting. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  PK T (alk)  12:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lynn Baggett


The article Lynn Baggett has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of how she meets WP:ENT or WP:GNG in article and I couldn't find evidence either. This is also an unref blp, with only an external link to a website specifically banned at WP:RS."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lynn Baggett


A tag has been placed on Lynn Baggett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. South Nashua (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi there... SO2F2
In the chemistry project, we try to adhere to WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY guidelines. There is a ton of literature on SO2F2, so it is out of the question that we try to cite the primary stuff. So I spent some time digging up the general reference to the sulfate ester chemistry being developed, and cited the review on the area. Hence my edits at sulfuryl fluoride. Within chem project, we also put themes together within articles, such that reactivity is combined within a section. It makes more sense and helps readers gain an overview. I'd be glad to elaborate or discuss. Cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, what is going on? Please enlighten or comment.--Smokefoot (talk) 23:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sulfuryl fluoride. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Multiple editors disagree with your content, and claiming a content-based dispute is vandalism is failure of WP:AGF policy. DMacks (talk) 20:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eon ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Johnson%27s_Shut-Ins_State_Park check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Johnson%27s_Shut-Ins_State_Park?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Paul Finebaum. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phil the gorilla
Hello Tiptopper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Phil the gorilla for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TomCat4680 (talk) 02:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cultural impact of the Beatles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JG66 (talk) 03:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Proposed deletion of Bocadin


The article Bocadin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Chocolate bar with no claim or evidence of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 06:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City for Conquest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Lane ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/City_for_Conquest check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/City_for_Conquest?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

DEA
Per WP:MALPLACED, do not redirect a "Foo" page to a "Foo (disambiguation)" page. Since the target of DEA was determined by a prior consensus, you will need to file a move request through WP:RM to obtain a new consensus to move the disambiguation page to the undisambiguated title before changing the status quo. bd2412 T 11:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

N295ck listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect N295ck. Since you had some involvement with the N295ck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 17:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Hope in the Wild moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hope in the Wild, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hope in the Wild (July 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hope in the Wild and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hope in the Wild, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hope_in_the_Wild Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whispering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hope_in_the_Wild reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Whispering ( t ) 20:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Mike Tyson Mysteries episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Juan ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Mike_Tyson_Mysteries_episodes check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Mike_Tyson_Mysteries_episodes?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:39, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Minor edits and concensus
Please do not mark edits as minor if there is a content change, which has the potential to be contested as you did at Kent Hovind. A review of the talk page archives, especially Talk:Kent Hovind/Archive 10, shows that a consensus was developed. If you wish to make changes, make your case. BiologicalMe (talk) 16:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The length of an edit does not determine major or minor, and gain consensus before restoring edits. Please read the links. Also, be aware that WP:BLP applies to edit summaries. BiologicalMe (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you; I’m learning. Tiptopper (talk) 10:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

"Consolidated 22" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Consolidated 22. Since you had some involvement with the Consolidated 22 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 23:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hope in the Wild concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hope in the Wild, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hope in the Wild


Hello, Tiptopper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hope in the Wild".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Gargoyles (1972 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Gargoyles (1972 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 22:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Crucifixion, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. TJRC (talk) 01:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Webster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Webster ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bill_Webster check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bill_Webster?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gargoyles (1972 film)


Hello, Tiptopper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gargoyles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A. J. Dillon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New London High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bocadin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bocadin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bocadin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 15:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

"Alex 3" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Alex 3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 21:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Cuomo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 15:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * KyleJoan (sock puppet account) Wrong - NO disruptive edits were made, reverted by anonymous user.
 * Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tiptopper (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Alex 6" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alex_6&redirect=no Alex 6] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 05:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

"Most career wins" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Most_career_wins&redirect=no Most career wins] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Your recent editing history at Elizabeth Holmes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 22:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Also, attempting to insert parameters that are invalid for the Infobox criminal, such as, would be considered a test edit. Peaceray (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 06452-017


A tag has been placed on 06452-017 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Dirk presser
Hello, Tiptopper

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Dirk presser, created by you. Your comments are welcome at.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"20664-12-3" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=20664-12-3&redirect=no 20664-12-3] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

CAS number redirects
Hi there, I noticed you've been making a lot of redirects from CAS numbers. When you do, you should add the R from CAS number redirect category template so other users know what these are. Cheers, Mdewman6 (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Schott bottle moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Schott bottle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 08:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)