User talk:TiredAsF12

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Diogo-Jota.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Diogo-Jota.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.thisisanfield.com/2020/10/jotas-first-league-start-as-mane-drops-out-predicting-the-liverpool-lineup-vs-aston-villa/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Diogo-Jota.jpg, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

New message from Whpq
Whpq (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DiogoJLiverpool.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:DiogoJLiverpool.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.rousingthekop.com/2020/10/03/diogo-jota-liverpool-10/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Copying images from the Internet
You cannot upload images you find on the internet unless they have been made available under a free license acceptable to Wikipedia. Most images you find on the Internet are copyrighted. Continued upload of such images is a copyright violation and will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Darwin Núñez
Hi, I think your recent edits on Darwin Núñez are unnecessary as they are already present in the article. It is a small article which hardly have 7 paragraphs and the additions you were trying to make are already included in those. And before you blame me for potential vandalism, you might wanna check your last edit which says he won his 'first cap for Portugal' in 2019.

Good day! Kokoeist (talk) 05:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Reply
OK, even if you are not, you are engaging in unnecessary overdetail in articles, and TRANSFERMARKT.com and ZEROZERO.pt are not reliable for WP for example. I have already reverted, please stop with this.

Good evening --Quite A Character (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The introduction in Trincão was fine as it was. The Danilo article was full of wrong things (like i said, using ZEROZERO as a reference for example; also, we don't mention every single match in storylines or every single thing in his career in the intros). Please leave articles as they are, thank you (if you notice, when you made this edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francisco_Trinc%C3%A3o&diff=985448940&oldid=985205021) i did not revert you, it was 100% good). --Quite A Character (talk) 00:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

After my polite advice (i have been here for 14 years, so i know how things work), you continue at Danilo? First of all, we don't write he is a Portuguese professional footballer because he was born in another country, we leave "...is a professional footballer" only. And you continue with the overdetail, i am going to report this. --Quite A Character (talk) 00:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, i will wait for the results of the report i made. If i'm wrong, i apologise to you and WP in general, then you can have the article for yourself. Good night --Quite A Character (talk) 00:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

What? I politely tell you are making wrong edits, and you say you have had enough and I created a mess? The consensus (not "consense") needed is for you to reinstate the correct storyline (you can have the updated photo in box and the IPA in intro, i have no problem with that as those are good contributions). Since you are not accepting any of my advice and we are now in an edit war (i stop with my actions now), i wait for the report results.

Good night. --Quite A Character (talk) 01:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Again, i had to correct the English in Trincão's intro after you decided to change it! About Danilo i repeat, i don't care about that article anymore, it stays your (incorrect) way and now i wait for the results of the report. --Quite A Character (talk) 01:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I am for consensus, yes i am sir. I have left the Danilo article in peace, i have left your version of the Trincão article (only correcting the language). If the results of the report are negative, i will personally apologise to you and leave you alone, what more consensus do you want? --Quite A Character (talk) 01:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Reinstate the correct Danilo version (we can write some storyline for his Marítimo career, where he made his Primeira Liga debut, but the rest is wrong, i tell you that and you don't believe me; also my evidence is the usage of ZEROZERO and TRANSFERMARKT, similar to the other acounts.), i will gladly stop the investigation. --Quite A Character (talk) 01:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Also, Trincão is not known as "Francisco Trincão", he's known as "Trincão" and that's it. But whatever, i leave it be. --Quite A Character (talk) 01:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Reply
I did what u asked u can check it yourself, now can u end the investigation please?


 * I am going to clean the English and the display up while respecting your work (maybe you can do same to mine), then will end the investigation. --Quite A Character (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Reply
What do u mean the same to u?


 * I mean you could also respect my work (i repeat, i have been here for almost 15 years, so i know how this works; i give you advice and you don't want them). I am now cleaning Danilo up, and then remove the investigation. Several changes: I had to add refs for what he did at Marítimo because you did not, and i removed (again!) stuff of no interest like him playing for Parma's reserves and games where he did not play; and no need to say "Danilo" or "club" six or seven times in each paragraph.

Maybe this will be the end of it, unless you decide to revert me again. --Quite A Character (talk) 02:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Cleanup complete, removed investigation. Apologies for the situation, good night. --Quite A Character (talk) 03:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I removed the investigation, but someone else inserted it again. Not my fault OK? Also, i had to revert you in Danilo Pereira again, PLEASE stop. --Quite A Character (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * OK, i wrote "Portuguese" in Danilo again. In Trincão, please find the IPA for his full name then insert it, but don't write he is known as "Francisco Trincão" again because he is not. Thank you --Quite A Character (talk) 18:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

What? Completely false! See my edit here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations&diff=986478320&oldid=986475359), where i told the administration you and i were OK. Then, this user reverted me here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations&diff=next&oldid=986478320) and started the investigation again, not my fault understand? I am going to talk with the administrator who blocked, to see if they can unblock (but please, don't say that i started with false accusations, the investigation proved both accounts were you, and sockpuppetry is a very serious matter here even when your intentions are good).

Good evening --Quite A Character (talk) 23:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I have talked to the administrator, saying your intentions are good. --Quite A Character (talk) 23:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

OK, i have already talked to Amanda, now we wait for her reply. --Quite A Character (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * What do you mean not revert you? Even if the edits are WRONG? But i promise i won't follow any of your future creations (only concentrate in Danilo and Trincão), a bit tired of trying hard to improve articles and being accused of screwing this or that person. --Quite A Character (talk) 00:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please read this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Diannaa#User%3AMartimc123). There, you have the steps that you have to follow to get the account unblocked. --Quite A Character (talk) 01:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)