User talk:Tiroru

List of Ultra Q monsters
Hi. Please don't create subarticles for all the monsters in List of Ultra Q monsters. Otherwise, they will most likely be deleted for lack of notability. I advise you to merge the articles back to List of Ultra Q monsters and to write about them there; that way, your contributions will last longer. Don't forget to make references to reliable sources, though, or someone might still nominate the list for deletion. Best,  Sandstein   09:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry．Ⅰdon't good at English.--Tiroru (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bemstar
A tag has been placed on Bemstar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Fl ee tf la me   22:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hayate Ayasaki
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hayate Ayasaki, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: List of Hayate the Combat Butler characters. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Chaiyo Productions
A tag has been placed on Chaiyo Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Abhishek Talkundefined 07:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ultraman Fighting Evolution
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ultraman Fighting Evolution, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Maethordaer (talk) 03:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Eleking article
Up for deletion.--Kbob (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Minoru Watanabe


The article Minoru Watanabe has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * BLP no sources in article to support notability and none found. Tagged as unref since Jan 2009.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 20:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tiroru! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 17 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Eiichi Kikuchi -
 * 2) Kin'ichi Kusumi -
 * 3) Minoru Watanabe -
 * 4) Kazunori Yokoo -
 * 5) Daisuke Terai -
 * 6) Toshinori Sasaki -
 * 7) Makoto Itō -
 * 8) Naoko Kamio -
 * 9) Toshihiro Ogura -
 * 10) Hirofumi Ishigaki -


 * 11. Tsutomu Kitagawa
 * 12. Akira Ohashi
 * 13. Mizuho Yoshida (actor)
 * 14. Yū Sekida
 * 15. Katsumi Tezuka
 * 16. Hiroko Sakurai

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daisuke Terai


The article Daisuke Terai has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:N-- Doesn't meet WP:GNG nor WP:ENT--no reliable, secondary sources that provide significant coverage of this actor, searched both as Daisuke Terai and 寺井大介.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j &#9883; e deckertalk 16:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yū Sekida


The article Yū Sekida has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article fails to address WP:NACTOR and there is a distinct lack of evidence of a fan base or any mention in GBooks or GNews.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Motokuni Nakagawa


The article Motokuni Nakagawa has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article fails to address WP:NACTOR and there is a distinct lack of evidence on GBooks or GNews for this actor. The article has been awaiting detail and improvement for over two years, so there seems little prospect of this changing in the near future.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 01:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Motokuni Nakagawa for deletion
The article Motokuni Nakagawa is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Motokuni Nakagawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kin'ichi Kusumi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kin'ichi Kusumi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kin'ichi Kusumi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe deckertalk to me 07:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Makoto Itō


The article Makoto Itō has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:N, unable to find reliable, secondary coverage providing in-depth of this Japanese suit/stunt actor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe deckertalk to me 14:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toshihiro Ogura


The article Toshihiro Ogura has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:N -- Unable to find reliable secondary sources providing in-depth coverage of this suit actor.  Additional sources welcomed, as always.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe deckertalk to me 18:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toshinori Sasaki


The article Toshinori Sasaki has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of this motion capture actor to demonstrate notability under the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe deckertalk to me 06:56, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Umenosuke Izumi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umenosuke Izumi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Umenosuke Izumi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Masao Fukazawa


The article Masao Fukazawa has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I can find no reliable independent references for this actor, unable to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Zambolar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zambolar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zambolar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  05:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Alien Zetton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alien Zetton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alien Zetton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  00:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Agira (Ultra monster) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agira (Ultra monster) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Agira (Ultra monster) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  19:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ultraman Fighting Evolution 0 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ultraman Fighting Evolution 0 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ultraman Fighting Evolution 0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 13:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Toho Monsters has been nominated for renaming
Category:Toho Monsters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ultraman: Great Monster Decisive Battle


The article Ultraman: Great Monster Decisive Battle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  23:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)