User talk:TitanOne/Archive4

WP:NODRAMA/2
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron  32  01:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Getting Pro Gaming Taskforce Restarted
Hello! I was just looking into helping get the Taskforce on Pro Gaming started again. If you are interested in putting effort into this wikiproject, please post here Best Regards, NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 21:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sallie Gardner at a Gallop
Hello Titan, just wanted to stop by and state that I have added an image to your recent nomination at DYK. Hope you don't mind :) Kindly Calmer   Waters  01:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I was kinda wondering too earlier if should put that in there. I believe that this article is a very important one. To date there have been no other film that has been found to be produced earlier. Thanks for your help, appreciate it! --TitanOne (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
✅. Best, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, appreciate it. I'm reviewing the process now, to ensure I use it correctly. --TitanOne (talk) 18:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rafael de Izquierdo y Gutíerrez
Hello! Your submission of Rafael de Izquierdo y Gutíerrez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Specifically, I believe that the concerns raised would be resolved by including a citation to the off-line reference you mentioned, which would like be accepted in good faith. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! otherlleft 20:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, responded accordingly.--TitanOne (talk) 20:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Magellan Planet Search Program
Hi Titan. Just have a question pertaining to your latest nomination at DYK... Thanks in advance Calmer   Waters  17:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied. Thanks for the heads up. --TitanOne (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied on the suggestions page. It may be a non-issue, just something was hoping you could shed some light on. Kindly Calmer   Waters  17:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking into it. Appreciate the time. --TitanOne (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of G 196-3
Hello! Your submission of G 196-3 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Arctic   Night  14:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * In addition, I would highly recommend that you use the DYK template provided for you when suggesting your hook at T:TDYK. This ensures consistency between hooks and in addition, if you do not use the template, your DYK creator's credit does not appear. Although this will probably be fixed along the way, using the template just makes it easier to review your nominations! Thanks,  Arctic   Night  14:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed issue. Points well taken note of. Thanks! --TitanOne (talk) 22:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of HIP 79431 b
Hello! Your submission of HIP 79431 b at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 07:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The Alt you suggested seems logical. --TitanOne (talk) 08:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

G 196-3
Please fix refs. 1,6,7 (inconsistent titles and web-links). Materialscientist (talk) 12:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Taking a look at it. --TitanOne (talk) 06:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ref 6 & 7 were interchanged, Ref 1 was screwy. Fixed. --TitanOne (talk) 17:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Messier 100
Hello! Your submission of Messier 100 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bradjamesbrown (talk) 19:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Please fix ref.3 - it is inconsistent and the web-linked text is not about Messier 100. Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed, it was an inherited reference top the starbox. --TitanOne (talk) 07:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Xeros
Titan- thanks for improving Xeros- I really appreciate it. I am fairly new to wikipedia, and my articles will never be perfect. E2eamon (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey we were all newbies at one point in time. I've submitted an ALT on DYK and I've also spruced up the references by adding other external sources. Check Xeros now, let me know what you think? --TitanOne (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It really looks good- you did a great job. But how come no one is approving it on the DYK page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by E2eamon (talk • contribs) 23:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Backlog is huge, normally peer review happens within 10 days. Right now patience is a talent. ;) --TitanOne (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Your autoreviewer request
Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have granted autoreviewer  rights on your account. I have taken a close look at the articles you have created and they show that you have a firm grasp on the policies pertaining to inline citations, references, verifiability, and NPOV. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information see Autoreviewer, and feel free to ask if you have any questions. Please keep up the good work. Kindly Calmer   Waters  02:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Your edit summary in the article Viola Gentry
Lol :) '' ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪  ▒  ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  04:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I just found it absolutely funny seeing an article suggesting the person can fly? I asked myself, is that literally? --TitanOne (talk) 09:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Your wordings were impeccable :) A welcome change from the edit summaries other editors leave :) Tc and have fun '' ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪  ▒  ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  13:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And yes, thanks for the work on Viola Gentry. '' ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪  ▒  ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  13:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Welcome... You really have to do something about that signature.. Haha.. lol.. --TitanOne (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Did You Know nomination for FirstCarbon Solutions
Hello! Your submission of FirstCarbon Solutions at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
 * They're actually pretty substantial WP:N and WP:NPOV issues and I've marked the nomination as a fundamental fail. I initially thought you might be a single purpose account created just for this page but you seem to be an experienced and capable editor so it's possible you might be able to address them.  Best of luck. - DustFormsWords (talk) 08:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I actually thought so myself. I just found them quite intresting when I stumbled upon the sources. I might need to ask help from other editors to get this accross, you're right it's a hard sell. --TitanOne (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar. I certainly appreciate all of the effort that you have been putting in to astronomy articles, and I am glad that I was able to be of assistance in improving at least one of them. James McBride (talk) 06:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Welcome James. I may need your help sometimes too, I'm still trying to coupe up with the scientific sources which I'm not that much proficient yet, in time though. Keep up the good work! Cheers! --TitanOne (talk) 14:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Viola Gentry article
Hi, just to let you know that the Viola Gentry has dipped below 1500 characters of prose so may need a little more expansion. (A sentence or two should do it.) Regards, -- Beloved Freak  13:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Took off the redundancy in a statement plus expanded FAI. Just over the 1500 marker. --TitanOne (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Bluebell in Fairyland
Hi. Can you clear up the issue at the DYK nomination for this? I agree with you that the person who approved it at DYK is a blocked sockpuppet account. But the article is legit and properly cited, so I'm not sure what to do now. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've checked your record and you seem to be a reliable editor. I'm just waiting for an experienced admin/editor to sign off (2nd opinion) on the hook, I'm sure everything will work out. You see this sock was not your ordinary sock, it was a center of a controversy. We'll fix the issue as soon as we can. Thanks for your patience. --TitanOne (talk) 21:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks. If you are keeping tabs on it, I'd be grateful if you would send me a message when we get the "all clear". Bluebell was an important musical in its day, and I intended to do an article on it for a long time. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure, in a couple of hours time it should be fine. I'll ping you once it's all clear. --TitanOne (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with this. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Messier 58
Okay, assuming "supernovae" is in fact the correct plural (and I believe this is a British/US spelling issue actually, since I've usually seen it as "supernovas") then "supernovae's" is still incorrect; shouldn't have the apostrophe-S. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nibios (talk • contribs) 00:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Pinoy Big Brother Floor Plan
Good day. I made that image based on photos of screen captures. I even have the original soft copies with me. The website you cited isn't even an official website of ABS-CBN. Also, notice how the caption of that site is the same as in the wikipedia article. Please revoke the deletion as the picture is mine. I MADE that picture, spent time on it. ABS-CBN DOES NOT HAVE a photo THE SAME as that. They have a 3D version, but it is NOT THE SAME as that. Please revoke that deletion and put my photo back-up. LordBelly06 (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I only presented it to the other admins, they would still have to investigate on it before its deletion. The image was deleted by Admin MrKIA11. --TitanOne (talk) 02:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

If you are not sure about an image, please just send it to FfD, don't tag it with a CSD. Those are intended for unquestionable violations. I assumed that you had found sources that this was definitely a violation. The image also needed a FfD tag on it. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 13:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks MrKIA11, noted. --TitanOne (talk) 13:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
Thanks! --TitanOne (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 50P/Arend
Hello! Your submission of 50P/Arend at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 08:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

GRB 090423
Hey mate! I noticed that you added GRB 090423 to the GA nominations page. I wanted to review it, since I have a keen interest in GRBs, but there wasn't a nomination template on the talk page. Did you just forget to add this or did you withdraw your nomination but forget to remove it from the nomination list? If you're still interested in taking it to GA, please add GAN and I'll get started on reviewing it. Thanks! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 18:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Totally spaced out on that one, my apologies. Added template. Thanks! --TitanOne (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * In case you hadn't noticed, I've started the GA review. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 05:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Failure warning
I have not seen any activity from you at GRB 090423 since I started the GA review. Please begin addressing my concerns soon, or I will be forced to fail the nomination. Thank you. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 16:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Cryptic C62, although I have pushed for its elevation, I would like to apologize as I would need to withdraw for now, as workload at the office increased. Thank you for your time and effort, I really appreciate it. --TitanOne (talk) 13:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Aye, real life can be such a hassle sometimes. Whenever you're ready to continue working on it, drop me a note and we'll make it a Super Duper Good Article. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 16:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review
Hey! I reviewed you. Sorry it took so long. Leave any comments or questions on my talk page. Homework2 Talk What I do!  02:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)