User talk:Titodutta/Archive 25

DYK nomination of Jasuben Shilpi
Hello! Your submission of Jasuben Shilpi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Suraj T  14:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Som999 (talk) 14:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Ryde school
Dear TitoDutto I am hoping you can help as there have been several inaccuracies in the Ryde School with Upper Chine site. There are School archives which will prove what is said. But I do not have them. The Isle of Wight County Press is a local newspaper which has covered articles on Ryde School during the time of its existence. Staff and pupils have also had national and international news during this period. Someone a few months ago seems to have vandalised the detailed history of the school and this has led to inaccuaracies because they tried to reduce the size of the article and in so doing infelicities have crept in. I hope that you can help. Thank you very much. For the record, there are verifiable records to back up what I have said, it is just that I do not a] have them b] someone else might be able to supply the details - they do exist, and I believe that Ryde School itself can provide it

Best wishes and many thanks Prof1ryde PROF1ryde (talk) 17:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Tito Dutto Thank you very much for your kindness. I am no good at technical things. Please may I ask your help to get the citations right. It tells me it does not work. Then someone will say that I am not doing it properly and might ban me. I know the information about Ryde School but I cannot do the technical stuff to put it on Wikipedia without your help. Thank you so much PROF1ryde PROF1ryde (talk) 19:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC) PROF1rdye22:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC) Dear Tito Dutto I am not any good at putting these references. The urls are at the Ryde School Website. http://www.rydeschool.org.uk/news/?pid=3&nid=13&storyid=51 TRIBUTE MAURICE FENN When I tried to place the references it told me I had not done the citation properly. I did try to copy the style from others on the page. Ryde school website also has a search facility and some of the information might be there, or at the Old Rydeians Association website for former pupils of the school. Thank you so much PROF1rydePROF1ryde (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Notekeeping for article on theater
Hi Tito, you mentioned that a parallel article could be written on theater about SRK. This TOI article does not seem relevant to the cinema article but it seems potentially relevant to an article on theater, so I thought I'd give you the link while I have it: Sanjib Chakraborty (2012, Nov 5). "Plays to promote peace on 'Gadai's stage'" Times of India. -- Presearch (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Progressive utilization theory
I would soon like to offer up for consensus the proposal to replace the current article with the draft Correct Knowledge and I have been working on. Before I do so, I was wondering if you might have any comments or suggestions for improvement. Thanks! Location (talk) 04:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Abhidevananda (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Che'r Cycle
KTC (talk) 08:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey Tito
Can I ask you what is an autoreviewer? And I saw something new to your counts. It says eponline. What is this?-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 12:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: STiki reports at AIV
If STiki is reporting to AIV, it's because you clicked "Vandalism" -- please be sure the edits are actually vandalism before using that button. If the edit is not helpful, but isn't vandalism, use the "good faith revert" button instead. To be more specific: edit warring is not generally considered vandalism. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Taare Zameen Par
Hello, you participated in a move discussion for Taare Zameen Par. A similar discussion has arisen regarding the article's lead. If you don't mind, could you please give your opinion on the matter? Thanks. Ω pho  is  15:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Rollback
This was a pleasant surprise. Thanks. I guess this will be useful for CV tools like STiki. Hope you didn't mind the few test edits I made in your sandbox. :) Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  02:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the advisory note. I really need the script which hides rollback option from watchlist. Where can I find it? Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  19:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

RE: NEXT (GROUP)
I thank you for telling me you reverted my informative addition to NEXT (group)... perhaps I didn't explain the reason for differentiating clearly enough, but since a search for N.E.X.T. totally missed N.Ex.T. (the korean band that wrote "Dear America") instead it sent searcher to NEXT (group) a band from USA. I thought my explanation in comments made this clear. while I do not think a disambiguous page is necessary, there needs to be something early in the article to redirect misdirected persons. If there is a template to do this, i have not heard of it. something needs to be there though because it took me another half hour to find out that the group name was not N.E.X.T but rather N.Ex.T. at which time I found their correct Wiki entry Qazwiz (talk) 21:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Uttaranchal
Problem is that some pages are specific to a year, where simply changing Uttaranchal to Uttarakhand may not be fine. For example, Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act. When this act came into picture, tentative name of the state was Uttaranchal, and so that should be mentioned, though page link can be provided for Uttarakhand only to emphasize the current name.

I was doing another similar change, Pondicherry to Puducherry, but only for UT, and not for city or district, as we still don't have consensus on name change (and hence page movement). So, these changes also cannot be done using script as each changed needs to be inspected carefully.

--GDibyendu (talk) 05:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Would you be interested in an article I want to work on?
I suggest we kill the Batman!. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 07:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Your message and its Reply is at talkpage of the article. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 08:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi.
Why did you delete the update I made on "John Todd" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Todd_%28occultist%29 I don't talk English very well, but I can't see why I should use the Wikipedia if they're not willing to accept the truth. - Basically there's this long paragraph which tells people, that he hadn't been to Vietnam, and no records shows his been there. - And that's where I wanted to add my contribution, to let people know that there's actual evidence that shows his been there. (His gravestone.) http://www.locategrave.org/l/5559356/Christopher-Sarayn-Kollyns-SC

Wikipedia is very confusing for me, so this reply is probably also done all wrong. :)

188.176.114.119 (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

She's a lady
She's a lady, by singer Tom Jones I suspect the info in this page is NOT correct. A modification was removed indicating that it was actually not Jimmy Page playing on the song. Just for the record, I like to know the source of the fact that Jimmy Pages was playing. On the website of JP www.jimmypage.com (official site) no session is mentionned. At the time another session musician, namely Big Jim Sullivan played in the Tom Jones Band. BJS died last year, and his website has been removed. The song was mentionned on that website. Please let me know. Sadeler (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject BPL
Can you help me to fix the Wikiproject BPL? I've asked two more user before but no response. I know you're a member of Wikiproject IPL. But please help me. Cause I can't fix that alone. Help me please. If you can't no matter. But please give a response whether you can or can not.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 14:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 14:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Again at my talk page.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 15:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 15:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Obesity in Nauru
Hi, I have just reviewed an article. --PlanetEditor (talk) 16:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You forgot to sign. --PlanetEditor (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I carefully read WP:WIADYK before nominating it. But as it was my first DYK nom, I was a bit nervous. --PlanetEditor (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Arshad Warsi Movies
As we already have an article under the proper title (see Shooting Star Production Ind Ltd) I had to change to delete, and believe you will concur. See my rationale at the AFD. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Titodutta/Saved BLP"
Moved this to User:Titodutta/Saved BLP, seems like a work in progress.TheLongTone (talk) 11:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Replied at your talk! --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

RE: Hatnote
I will try to remember this template, although i have already forgotten the name of the other one you mentioned :(

I added the likely reason for someone being at Next (group) (the song they wrote) since that is most likely reason someone would be there but might not recognize the different spelling... and although i dont see how someone would end up on N.EX.T when looking for Next (group) I added a hatnote anyway. --Qazwiz (talk) 14:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Som999 (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Quick query
Hi Tito, it looks like it will take me a week to get those books. Meanwhile, let me ask you a quick question: What is meant by the Bengali phrase "Jini Ram Tini Krishno Ek-i Dehe Ramkrishna" - that is, how would you translate it into English? Thanks -- Presearch (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
PlanetEditor (talk) 19:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
PlanetEditor (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Bengali category name question
Tito, what would be the Bengali categorization name for "School districts in the United States"? That way the two school district articles in Bengali would be in the same category and it would be linked to en:Category:School districts in the United States Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 05:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Tito! I can help you out and see if I can find Bengali-language documents that may reveal how the school districts translate it. The New York and Detroit districts may have documents that could help in that regard. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Page 11/42 of the English document at http://detroitk12.org/resources/students/codeOfConduct/Student_Code_of_Conduct.pdf says "Students are advised that all staff employed by the School District of the City of Detroit are required to function in accordance with this code.*"
 * Check Page 11/42 of the Bengali document at http://detroitk12.org/resources/students/codeOfConduct/Student_Code_of_Conduct-Bengali.pdf and see what it says
 * WhisperToMe (talk) 06:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Tito! If you have other translation issues between English and Bengali I can see if I can find documents that clear things up WhisperToMe (talk) 06:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * BTW, what is the text on the front cover of http://detroitk12.org/resources/students/codeOfConduct/Student_Code_of_Conduct-Bengali.pdf that is in Bengali? That way I can add it as an external link to the Bengali article. Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 06:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There is text below the English logo that is Bengali. The English version would say "Rights and responsibilities of students in the Detroit Public Schools K-12 Reprint, 2011" on the bottom - I am looking for the equivalent in Bengali WhisperToMe (talk) 06:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, so it has a similar meaning. What I meant... at bn:ডেট্রয়েট পাবলিক স্কুল্‌স I added the external link to the document, but I inputted an English label. I would like to have that Bengali text on the front page used as the label for the external link of "Rights and responsibilities of Government schools of Detroit" on the Bengali Wikipedia. Thanks! WhisperToMe (talk) 06:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! WhisperToMe (talk) 06:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 07:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 07:38, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 07:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 08:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 10:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Again at my talk page.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 12:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Mind commenting here?
Articles_for_deletion/Mohammad_Nazim could use some comments from experienced Indian editors. Thanks! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Shipra Mazumdar
Hello Titodutta,

I am interested in mountaineering biographies and would like to improve this article. Do you have access to any reliable sources in Bengali that could help fill out the article? Thank you.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  00:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

moving an article
hi Tito (hopefully) quick q - My article is Michael Falzon (actor) there is an existing article on Michael Falzon a politician - as I suspect they have equally footing in their respective spheres and to add clarity, can the latter be moved to Michael Falzon (politician)? Is there a protocol for this. I know there is a Move button, but as a complete noob, I am a little hesitant in just doing it without advice. Thanks I hate thinking of names (talk) 10:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you :) I was sure there would be a 'right' way to do it. I really appreciate all your help/time.  I hate thinking of names (talk) 07:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Again from WP:BPL
Okay how'll I fill the red links at template?-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 10:13, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 10:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Please create this
please this one -- Category:Bangladesh Premier League articles needing attention.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 10:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * What about this Template:Portal/Images/Bangladesh premier league-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 10:51, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 10:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
I've added 3 more and added an additional information about Ragib. Check them.  Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent reports at UAA
Hi, and thanks for your recent contributions at WP:UAA. However, there are some issues here. First of all, it is extremely difficult for us to evaluate the relative offensiveness of non-English slang. UAA is not really a discussion forum, it is a place for a more simple evaluation of user names. If it is unclear, which it pretty much always will be with foreign-language slang, if the account violates policy or not it should be discussed at WP:RFCN instead and the user behind the account should be invited to participate in that discussion.

However, I have removed all the reports you just added as unactionable. Only one of them has ever even made an edit, and that was over six months ago. The other ones had never edited and were registered in 2010 and 2007. There is no problem to address with an inactive account or one that has never even tried to edit since it was registered five years ago and such reports will usually be summarily declined. Please be more careful when making such reports in the future. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1½ years ago I made a report at Google's forum about Google's Web Search non-English search suggestions. Most probably you know, Google does not suggest "person A" anything when "person A" is doing an adult search. But, for languages like Bengali, even if you have Safe Search turned on and doing the simplest search, you often get some weird/very insulting search suggestions from Google. My report at Google forum went nowhere, but, still you can see it here.
 * Anyway, (naturally) it is not a problem in Google or Wikipedia, it is a problem in whole world wide web.
 * About the reports, Urban Dictionary link was added with each report so that one could check the meaning of those words in dictionary.
 * I feel, there are some usernames which are reserved/can not be registered as they contain foul language etc. It should be similar in other languages too.
 * Having a very very insulting foul word in slang is much serious than having a company name or email address in username.
 * Inactivity might be a reason to block those accounts, since those are unused. --Tito Dutta (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Uh, no it isn't. That is rather the point of my message. We don't bother blocking accounts that were registered years ago and have never made a single edit and reporting them is a waste of your time and the time of the admins who review username reports. That would be why I asked you not to do it again. The broader question of how to evaluate foreign language slang is something that could be discussed, in fact I have opened a thread about it at WT:UAA. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Bluewood Ski Area - Bluewood Ski Patrol
Hello Tito,

I am curious if you can eleberate as to why my addition/edit of the Bluewood Ski Patrol section of the Bluewood Ski Area page was revoked?

I am more than willing and interested in complying with current policies. I am just not sure what was wrong with the content.

Thanks,

BrandonSkipatroller4-1 (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Som999 (talk) 21:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:BPL
Hey we've 5. What'll we do next?-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 15:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

alternative views of the war as allegory, etc
Hello, I don't usually edit any pages so I am not familiar with the process. I don't see how my addition was not constructive, for it offered a very valuable alternative perspective. I saw only pro-allegorical interpretations and to reject an opposing view would be non-constructive, in my opinion. Weasel words? Couldn't I describe the pro-allegorical interpretation sections as being fluffy words?

I did not realize that there would be people immediately censoring my post, even though I did supply a source which discusses the exact topic on a legitimate link and not merely the opinion of my anonymous self. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.54.113 (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * One new message at 98.*'s talk page. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  18:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have !voted there, let's see how it goes. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  19:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have replied in the Hindi Wikipedia. There are more articles in Bhojpuri, Marathi, Nepali, Tamil and Gujarati. Some wise person has placed a deletion template in Sanskrit Wikipedia. From what I could gather from Hindi Wikipedia, at least two editors are required to form a consensus on deletion of an article. It might be the same for rest of them as well. If you are interested you can go ahead and nominate the article in all wikipedias and I'll comment in every one of them. I can nominate it too, but I'll have to get used to Twinkle first. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  20:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am waiting for Wikiversity and Hindi Wiki discussions to conclude before taking this to meta–wiki. That way we will a have better idea of where the cross–wiki consensus is on Kedar Joshi. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  18:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Progressive utilization theory
FYI: Per your previous involvement in the discussion, I thought you might be interested in commenting in Talk:Progressive utilization theory. Thanks! Location (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI: An alternative proposal has been offered at Talk:Progressive utilization theory. Thanks again! Location (talk) 22:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw that proposal! --Tito Dutta (talk) 04:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

PERM
Hi. When I say  'active' I generally  mean far more than 20 reverts in  a month. FWIW, I do not  believe that  is a compelling  reason  for the right. I sometimes do  that  many reverts in  a day  on  the fly  while going  about  my  normal content editing  and admin work. That said, PERM is not  an RfA-style nomination  page, and there is no  reason  why  a user can't  request  the right  themselves if they  really  want  it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * a) 20 reverts a month, that means 20*15=300, at least 300 general edits a month, 20 revert/month is a good number when a user is not using automated tool and editing selected pages only (he has 400 or something unique page edit with 5 point something average edits per page! b) i) in Rfa one can self-nominate too ii) I strongly believe, getting nomination by other editors show they trust the editor. There are few good admins who grant right/flag to deserving candidate without asking. The first flag/status I got was Autopatrolled, I didn't request it anywhere, Ironholds somehow saw my contribution and and gave me this flag. I have talked to at least 500 editors and 20 admins in last one and a half year, but hardly remember few names, but I face no trouble at all to recall the name of Ironholds. It is all about Oremus pro invicem which means "Let's pray for each other"! And you can see the nomination from this point of view too: an editor with at least some knowledge and experience, after working for a long time with another editor (frankly, I know him and his edits for last one year) thinks the other editor deserves the flag and that's why he is nominating his name so that an admin can assess the belief and trust of the editor. --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I  don't  entirely  agree. Autopatrolled is not  a 'status' and has no  benefits for the user and is not  a reward for good editing. In  fact  none of the minor user rights are a trophy. They  are just  there to  help  users interested in  working  in  those areas to  get their work  done more easily. I  have accorded Autopatrolled to  many  users without asking  them but  that  is to  relieve the work  of the New Page Patrollers. There is no  reason why  those who  want  the other rights can't  ask  for them  themselves,  but  it  is not  a question  whether they 'deserve' them  or not,  but  it's a misunderstanding  that  many  younger users make. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * a) That was an example, I know purpose of Autopatrolled, since we don't have dozens flags, it is not easy to start a comparison. b) I had notified him yesterday, I have not checked my watchlist still today, in case he has not replied there, I'll ask him to check that thread again. c) Nice to learn you grant auto-patrol too --Tito Dutta (talk) 04:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have replied at the Rfp. I don't think I am ready for this yet. A few issues have cropped up recently which will prevent me from taking any extra work on WP for now. I will probably ask for this right down the road. For now, I am satisfied with what I have. Thank you Tito for putting my name up for this and thank you Kudpung for considering it. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  17:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

henry kaiser died
I cited my sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joedog96 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I can not check the edit! The edit and the edit summary have been removed by an admin! --Tito Dutta (talk) 04:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Suffice it to say that the edits were completely inappropriate vandalism that you were perfectly correct in removing. The claim that he had sources is a lie and I have blocked that user.  Beeblebrox (talk) 04:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Request for Comment: My talk page replying style
As you know I reply at message sender's talk page, and that's why after seeing my talk page you may think I am inactive, because you see all the messages are unanswered. But, I generally don't reply at message sender's talk page if 1) message sender is spamming/vandalizing 2) message sender is a bot 3) sender is sending a bulk message to many editors 4) I personally think the discussion is very important and want to keep an unfragmented discussion for future reference.

But, I am noticing sometimes my talk preference is badly conflicting with other editors talk preference. So, I am planning to change mine to reply everything at my talk page and then add Talkback at sender's. It might be be confusing for many editors who regularly talk with me and wait for a "You have a new message" banner after sending me a message. That's why I am requesting for comments. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * Support  -- Of course. You can do it. I can give my example. I do this.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 10:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support — Isn't that how things were before you suddenly changed your style and decided to reply on sender's talk pages? Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  18:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Doha (Indian poetry)
Tito ji, Namaskar. How are you? I am bothering you as before. I have written a short note on Doha, an Indian verse format. It is in my sandbox. Kindly re-view this note and give your suggestion for its improvement. By the way, I am glad to have met the "original" Soni. Thanks. Regards.Soni Ruchi (talk) 07:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Soni Ruchi (talk) 07:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Tito ji, instead of expanding the existing Doha (poetry) I have created a new page Doha (Indian literature). Kindly review. Thanks. Regards.Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Tito ji, both articles deal with Doha, whereas the existing Doha (poetry) brifly refers to the use of dohas in Hindi poetry, my article briefly traces the historic origin and use of dohas in various old and present languages. Please for my sake read the two, compare, and arrive at your conclusion.Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Primary topic is not Doha-Hindi poetry.Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:30, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

tito ji, if you are not convinced why should I not seek deletion of my article?Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Jasuben Shilpi
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That was a good DYK.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Congrats... You gave an awesome answer in the Teahouse!
Hi! Thanks for your useful and detailed troubleshooting of an editor's problem with their signature not showing up. It's really great for new editors to receive help with technical problems, and you did a thorough job explaining what likely went wrong and how to fix it. Thanks for doing that!

Also, in case you were wondering, we're trying a new experiment centered around 'acknowledgements' in the Teahouse. If you see someone doing something awesome, find the Badge that fits best and share it with them. More details are linked on the Badge itself. Cheers! Ocaasit &#124; c 01:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 
 * Thanks! --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Jasvant Singh
I have no intention of spamming wikipedia or using it for promotion of my site. I just want to add link to a book written by Subhas Chandra Bose for benefit of people who want to read book written by Subhas Chandra Bose. Since there is no link on the page where reader can get a copy of Subhas Chandra Bose's book for reading I think my link will add value to the page. I appreciate the fact that you are monitoring this page and making sure that all content is appropriate. Please suggest me how I can help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasvantsingh (talk • contribs) 03:57, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't add the link. "Further reading" section is written in summary style and we are not giving download links. With eact book we are trying to add ISBN link, clicking on it takes to full details page.
 * Furthermore that site's license is not clear. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Camus Celli
Asking you since you are experienced editor. I have problem asserting notability of an article. Do you think this article pass WP:MUSICBIO? Please continue the discussion here, thanks. --PlanetEditor (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is the subject, then "yes"! --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think the references provided in the article are mostly from personal sites of individuals in the music industry. So there is an RS issue. --PlanetEditor (talk) 10:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Evidently! --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

A message from Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York
Dear user, Thank you for communicating with us.We apologize if there was any error in our judgement when editing the page about Raymond Franz.We read Wikipedia's policies thoroughly and realised that some information presented on the page was incorrect and presented a completely different view of how our society's representatives deal with matters regarding apostasy,especially in the case of Raymond Franz. With a case like this,it is advisable to ask a representative of our organization about the matter.If nobody you contact knows about this and you start researching using the internet,you are not going to receive 100% factual sources.So if you do not have many facts,please do not publish information like this on a well-researched online encyclopedia.It can give this website a bad reputation.You did nothing wrong to restore the page to normal.That is your job as a Wikipedia editor.But we must bring this to your attention:The information on the page needs to be re-edited to provide satisfactory factual and unbiased information.If no such information can be found,it is our request as a legal coorporation that you remove the page and use the information on a website that is not an online encyclopedia. Yours, Jehovah’s Witnesses Contact us: 25 Columbia Heights BROOKLYN NY 11201-2483 UNITED STATES +1 718-560-5000 www.jw.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.191.154 (talk) 18:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You are talking about this edit. You deleted a large portion of the article without mentioning anything in edit summary. Furthermore, 1) there were numerous formatting errors, 2) you removed categories and interwikis, persondata, defaultsort.
 * If you think something is wrong in the article, you can discuss too! --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello, IP. I understand and appreciate your concern regarding the article and we would certainly appreciate your assistance towards improving it.  However, so as not to get off on the wrong foot, there are a few things you should be aware of:


 * 1) We take threats of legal action quite seriously.  If you do make such a threat, you will be blocked from editing until the threat is withdrawn or the case is resolved.  I understand that you did not make such a threat above, but language such as "legal corporation" tells me that you're not an attorney and might make such a threat inadvertently.  The corporate status of JW carries no weight here.


 * 2) While it is possible to edit wikipedia without an account, doing so both reveals information that you may want to keep private (your IP address, which is correlated with your geographic location) and is seen by many editors as a "second-class citizen".  I encourage you to create an account and, if you have an official position in the JW and wish to edit articles relating to JW, "declare your interest" and ask for assistance in editing.  Conflicts of interest are taken seriously here.  WP:COI has the details of how to handle this.


 * 3) Perhaps most important, please understand that we do not aim for "100% factual sources".  The goal of wikipedia is to be a neutral summary of secondary and tertiary sources; where those sources are wrong, wikipedia will be wrong as well.  This is by design.


 * 4) It's very common that new editor who arrive wanting to make specific changes to a specific article find themselves frustrated by a seemingly endless stream of policies and customs. While I admire your zeal, you will be a much more effective editor if you don't initially edit articles you feel passionately about.  Making a hundred small changes over the course of a month (and watching how the community reacts to those changes) will give you a better sense of what works and what doesn't.  Reading the talk pages of articles, dropping in a the WP:Teahouse and even watching the drama at WP:ANI will let you learn from other people's mistakes.


 * 5) Don't be afraid to ask questions. You can do so here or at my talk page, or better yet at the WP:Teahouse.


 * Looking forward to your contributions,


 * Garamond Lethe 19:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I just sent a brief message about relevant policies to the user's talk page. The Anonymouse (talk &#124; contribs) 19:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

STiki
After downloading, I have unzipped the zip file and see a Jar file named "STiki_2013_01_26". I am double-clicking on this file, but nothing is happening, no program is opening. --PlanetEditor (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Please include:
 * Operating system.
 * Make sure you have Java runtime environment installed! --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I use Windows 8. Yeah it is working after installing Java. Thanks! --PlanetEditor (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Port-du-Salut Abbey
Hi Tito, how are you?

Please, I ask 5 minutes of your precious time, if you can read this page I just made. It's an Abbey I visited this month... fot the 10th time! Please, help me to correct my mistakes, :-)

Thanks a lot for you help.

Rex Momo (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Port-du-Salut Abbey

 * Thank you!!! Rex Momo (talk) 00:27, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I put something more, now. May I take off the advice at the beguinning? Sorry, I'm going to zzz zzz sleep zzz... see you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rex Momo (talk • contribs) 00:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thx

Nirajrm (talk) 02:25, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 

Pankaj Butalia
Dear Tito, thanks for accepting the article through AfC. Please take a look at its present shape. I can upload an image but am not sure whether the available images qualify for fair use. Do you think the article deserves to be moved from Start to C class? Thanks! Amuk (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The article is a much better condition! You can not upload image of a living person under fair use! --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the prompt clarification. I won't upload the image. Amuk (talk) 08:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Lyrics
Hey Tito, the 2.* IP in the discussion about Bismil's poem is me, Sitush. I'm not supposed to be editing at all, per medical advice, but I couldn't let this one slide. Due to my recent stay in hospital, I'm having to live with other people until the doctors think it is ok for me to live at home alone. That means I am using someone else's computer etc and I don't want to log in because I am concerned about my password getting ripped off etc. It took me a long time to remember that password and I've no intention of changing it! I reveal who I was in a discussion at WT:INB that Anupam was involved with, but you may have missed it & so I think it best to let you know. Right now, I'm walking away from Wikipedia again because it is already stressing me out.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, if you want confirmation then just email me and I'll do that thing. As an IP, I cannot click on your "Email this user" link, but you can use mine.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 09:27, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah alright! I was waiting for you there and that's why did not say anything "yes" or "no"! Do you think article needs to be fully protected until you come back? --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hopefully not because that would prevent Anupam etc from usefully adding to it with stuff about the background etc. Anupam seems to be pretty keen on inserting scripts at the moment (see a discussion that Regentspark has recently joined on WT:INB) and it is that which might be driving them on the poem article. However, the article can and should be expanded in other ways if the sources are out there. As I have said, the two that I dumped in Further Reading do contain a bit of extra info that could be used. I'm just not in a fit state to get too involved right now and, in any case, I'd rather not start making edits to India-related content as an IP because I could lay myself open to a charge of socking.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 09:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Asaram Bapu Article
I didnt understand, why you reverted my revision (535833164) of Asaram Bapu article. How I m making it POV pushing, I have taken content from older revisions and added references.Naveentirthani (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You are talking about this diff. Answer is by adding honorfics (what is "Sri Sri"?) also by adding references from "ashram.org"! BTW, there is a report againt you at Sockpuppet_investigations/Naveentirthani where you can try to defend yourself, if you want! (I mentioned this investigation at article's talk page too) --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:40, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If I have added honorfics (Sri) - because He is spiritual leader, where we use Honorifics, and even if its illegal to add honorfics, you should have remove honofics only - why you have remove his name in other languages. Regarding references - I have also added reference of see diff ,and ashram.org reference for count of Ashrams, Samitis etc - what more sources are expected to be given here. Naveentirthani (talk) 12:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, names in Indian language should be removed too, see User:Sitush/Common! And Wikipedia does not permit those "Sri Sri", "Sant" ect! --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have seen this at many places like - Ramdev, where hindi and urdu words are added, and please clarify about references removed.Naveentirthani (talk) 13:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you read User:Sitush/Common? There is not an existing consensus! About references, see WP:RS, WP:Secondary! Also see WP:LEAD. --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you please give examples of references, which can be given. You removed ashram.org (saying its self website) - I dont know why news website link is not accepted. Can you please mention which rule I am not following here. - I am not an wiki-expert but wanted to learn from you. Thanks -- Naveentirthani (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you read WP:RS? There is more than enough details there! And if you want to learn more you can try WP:Adopt! There was another issue, lead content should be summary of the whole article, so what you are writing is lead should be explained in details in body! --Tito Dutta (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sana Amin Sheikh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed! --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Checkwiki
What is WP:CHECKWIKI error #34? I can't read about it on the Checkwiki page. You were listed as one of the participants there so I'm hoping you know. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  18:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Here is your CW#34! And this is the main index page! --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * In case you are starting your journey with AWB, start with error #61 (unless Bgwhite and his bot have not finished everything already)! --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If switch tags are not allowed it's going to be a problem in India. broke the rotation of images with this edit. I am not sure what the problem is in having switch tags within articles (is this written somewhere?). I am going to add a talkback to Bgwhite's talkpage referring to this discussion. Correct Knowledge  «৳alk»  18:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sign TB templates! Bots don't archive unsigned posts! Better add talkback using Twinkle. Twinkle knows what to do! --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. I am a bit low tech, I don't use twinkle. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  19:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Do one thing, go to his talk page, and in every 30 seconds edit/correct/expand your post (I mean, edit something in his talk page). Keep on doing it! In case he is using AWB now, it'll be a wonderful experience for him (don't ask why!) --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * For some reason that sounds like a fun thing to do, but I'll let this one slide. I am expecting him to help me out with something. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  19:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * First off... Tito, does that animated image on your talk edit page mean you have a heart? Boy, you could have fooled me on that :)    You will also page for you indiscretion of constantly changing my talk page.


 * Image rotation/switching doesn't actually work. Wikipedia articles are cached to reduce the load on the servers.  The article's cache entry is only updated when an edit is made to the page or the cache is manually purged.  If a person sees an image one day, but the cache was updated, they may not see that same image for a long time.  Makes it hard if that person wanted to download that image.  Also, switch commands should never be used in articles as they are meant for templates only.   The tag to display more than one image is a possibility.  I've got to leave for a few hours, so I can't respond back for a bit.  Bgwhite (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reply. Image rotation/switiching was agreed upon after two very long and painful discussion at Talk:India. What you say about cache not being purged might be true, but for some reason I saw new images everyday in the India article without fail. Maybe that's because a lot of edits are made everyday to a heavily trafficked article like India. Using a tag is not an option because if all images are displayed simultaneously images will tend to dominate text (which is against some guideline, can't remember which). Can an exception be made for this particular article? If not, we'll have to go in for another long and painful discussion at the talk page. Take your time with the reply. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  19:40, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you find the talk discussion on Talk:India for me. Bgwhite (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Talk:India/Archive 35 and Talk:India/Archive 37 were the major ones. There could be others. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  21:33, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. This is a tough one. Alot of people have obviously put alot work and thought into deciding what photos go into the article. One of the talk pages led to  this TfD, which is about image rotation.  From the TfD, there are editors who hate the idea of image rotation, which resulted in the deletion of the rotation template and images. In this particular case, I'd say restore the switch statements that were removed as alot of people working in WP India want this.  One of the reasons stated in the TfD, vandalism, is not going to be an issue in the India article.  There are just too many people having the page in their watchlist and would notice the vandalism.  However, if ever brought for discussion at a wide forum, I don't think it would be allowed.  Bgwhite (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am glad you said that. Holding the whole process again would be very very cumbersome. I'll restore the switch tags and refer to this discussion in my edit summary. Thank you for your help. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  22:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC)