User talk:Titoxd/Archive16

Time for another to coach
Now that EivindFOyangen is basically gaining more experience, I think I can take on someone else for admin coaching. I think there are a few admins on the coaches list not assigned, and might be an idea to start 'pruning' the requests list using the new rules, to try and get this moving a little bit. I can help out if you want with that, but as you're officially the coordinator I'll let you have the first bash if you want :) Petros471 16:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, is there any special requirements to take note of? Like for example I notice the top request is from an existing admin, is that treated in the same way as the others? Petros471 21:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Destruction
Vandal that you are, I have of course indefinitely blocked you for this edit. So you might want to make a second attempt at it... :) Splash - tk 05:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ack... Tito xd (?!?) 06:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Djing1985
I am guessing that the barnstar on this user page, which claims to have been awarded by you, is a fake. Just thought you might want to know. Cheers TigerShark 18:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * All the awards on his page were stolen from fuddlemark. Oh, and to Titoxd, just saying it's been a pleasure to work with you, but I'm going on extended wikibreak, and I may or may not be back under this username. NSLE 09:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Protection of cite web
Hi Titoxid. May I ask you to unprotect cite web? Semi-protection is sufficient. I would agree to a hard move protection. But there is currently no need to protect that from editing by established accounts. We had some forths and backs recently but that has been settled. There are a whole bunch of good contributors there which are not admins (erm, including me). Please do not prevent us from maintaining this template. Thank you for your consideration. --Ligulem 09:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

TC Mexican Climatology link
I appreciate the link, but there is no rainfall information at that site. =( Thanks for trying to help though.  Thegreatdr 22:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:infobox hurricane small
I was thinking the exact same thing just an hour or so before you added it to Alberto, with the projected track instead of the final track. This makes me think of the time we both uploaded a high-resolution version of Image:2005 Atlantic hurricane season map.png. I guess we think alike. :) --tomf688 (talk - email) 00:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Us folks are evil
Heh. I'm sorry if I offended anyone by that, believe me I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings. I'll be blunt. The main reason I suggested an expansion to Simple was so some of the contributors who like to create articles, including those who don't write particularly well, are able to make articles and write with the lower quality of grammar they typically use. Wikinews needs help as well, definetly, but those users I mentioned on my talk page would probably continue the simple writing, copy and pasting, and spelling errors they use here. In short, we should expand to both. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh wow, I thought I was in trouble :) I wasn't sure of the meaning of the smilie, though now I understand. If that's the format for Wikinews, then that would be perfect. Yea, both should definetly be expanded. It's just a matter of who wants to abandon the mother land and spend most of their time in faraway territories. I for one prefer the safety net of the mother land. (Hope you got the analogy). Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Really? That's good to know, then. Wikinews sounds very easy, and I might help out if I have time as the season progresses. Spanish does sound hard, though. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Tkendi
I blocked this guy because he kept recreating Tkendi but only for an hour because he vandalised my user page (thanks for the revert) and I didn't want it to look like revenge. Please review. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * An hours OK, he might have cooled off and I'll still be here. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Inupiaq
An anonymous user created the legitimate text in ik:Iqsrabutilik within the last little bit, meaning that there is indeed potential users. Does this effect your view of the project? -- Zanimum 14:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Katrina
Thank you for answering my comment in the Katrina FAC. But now I have another question. Go to this page to see my question. Remember, feel free to answer it. juan andrés 17:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Zeta
Where did the Zeta agreement occur, I can't seem to find it. TimL 00:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Thanks for that! Great job on the design. It looks awesome :) Hurricanehink ( talk ) 12:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

WWE roster Vandals
You can rest assured that the 3 vandals to the WWE roster page have been blocked. -- J Fred  02:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Revert
Thank you for the revert of that. -- Dakota ~ 02:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Infobox hurricane small
I was going through List of storms in the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season today, and noticed that the tracks were missing on the TDs/USTS; turns out you modified the Infobox hurricane small template. Anyway, there's a problem, at least on my end. Take a look at the TD10 section. Does its satellite image appear for you? It doesn't for me. I strongly believe this to be a result of your modification. Any idea how to fix it? -- RattleMan 04:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I temporarily reverted your edit at that template, and the problem disappears. However, I did read your comment at WP:VPT and it seems that you had the same problem with TD2-E on the 2K6PHS page, when the image was a PNG. As CesarB said, this problem is in the fact that it's a PNG. Should we convert it to a JPG and reupload? -- RattleMan 04:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Converting an image to JPG doesn't neccessary lower its quality, if done correctly. I just converted a JPG at the highest quality setting and there is no noticable difference, even at 5x zoom. Anyway, I guess I can just wait for this to be fixed. Thanks! -- RattleMan 04:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Consulta de borrado
Hola. El artículo Canal 5 creo que ha sido suficientemente contextualizado y mejorado, y la entrada trasladada a Canal 5 de Rosario. Consulto si estás de acuerdo en cambiar tu voto para archivar la consulta. Saludos 190.49.211.9 06:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC) (Usuario: Antur - de la wiki en español ) - no estoy registrado aquí

SarahVulva
Hey, thanks for stepping in to remove the image. I wasn't going to bed until I felt I could drop out of the hunt. Now I'm going to sleep. Thanks a lot! Good luck!

Regards, -- Alphachimp  talk  07:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support
Dear , Thank you very much for your support on my recent RfA. I am pleased to announce that it passed with a tally of 72/11/1, and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the tools, but please let me know if there are any admin jobs I can do to help you, now or in the future. —Cuivi é nen 02:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Atom
Could you please review atom as the antimatter section is clearer. Rex the first talk 17:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Katrina
I'll try, but I, too, am really busy in real life. I've been working double shifts since Saturday, and have to until Wednesday, so I don't have a lot of time on here. I'll try and keep an eye on things, but you should ask someone else who would probably have more time. Nilfanion maybe? He did rewrite much of that article. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 12:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks!
-- Pilot| guy  22:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Please help on William Shakespeare
Posted by PruneauT 01:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.

TfD nomination of Template:Delete
Template:Delete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Wisd e n17 19:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Norm Coleman
Hi, I am sending this message to serious contributors who may be interested in articles related to U.S. politics. I believe I am receiving an unreasonable response-- and at times insulting and rude-- from the editors of Norm Coleman article, who refuse to remove a section that may offer some interesting trivia for Wikipeidia users, but is irrelevant to people interested in reading an encyclopedia article on a member of U.S. Senate. If you have time, please take a look at the article. Regards. 172 | Talk 03:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpg
Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpg "NASA Spacelink has Moved" - please specify the source of the image. (SEWilco 04:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC))
 * Copyvio? Image is at the bottom of the artist's Moon gallery page: http://www.psi.edu/hartmann/pic-cat/moon.html and the preceding page says "All Content Copyright William K. Hartmann". (SEWilco 04:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC))

Copyright problems with Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SEWilco 04:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Katrina revert
Thanks, I was looking at an old version of the article and didn't realize it. (for some reason the big banner at the top didn't register) TimL 03:41, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Away and tool stuff
I'm going to be off to China for about 3 weeks starting Monday, so happy editing in the meantime! I committed some new improvements into the tool, in case you haven't seen them already. Hope things go smoothly while I'm away! See you soon, —AySz88\ ^ - ^ 08:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

10,000
It seems we've finally broken past 10,000 assessed articles. We have—thanks, in no small part, to your own creative ingenuity in devising the use of distributed rating for this project—achieved the first steps of what may become the semi-mythical article validation system that everyone always talks about. More than that, your efforts have spurred furious activity on the part of many formerly lethargic WikiProjects. We—as Wikipedians—are all in your debt. Kirill Lokshin 05:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Work via WikiProjects
Hi Tito,

Haven't heard from you in a while, I hope things are going well with you. Congratulations on your Barnstar! I have been trying to contact WikiProjects in a second round using these possible postings and this list as a template. Since there are now so many WikiProjects, I'm using our ten categories to organise things now, so they match with our categories in the V0.5 template, etc. The problem is, there is a huge amount to be done and I'm currently the only one working on it. It seems to be very fruitful - several of the postings have resulted in groups adding themselves to the bot (Films, Simpsons, Japan). I'd like to get all the projects re-contacted this summer if possible. If you have any time either to contact the Language & literature projects (next group on the list once I get through the Arts) or to update one of the listings (Science or Places would be simplest), it would be a great help. Thanks! Walkerma 04:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, I'd guessed life just got busy. Would you prefer to focus on contacts/followups only, or on updating/reformatting listings, or can you manage both? I'm thinking of a timetable of Science in July, Places in August (or vice versa). What would you like to do? Thanks, Walkerma 22:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I would be EXTREMELY grateful if you could help out with the infrastructure stuff, you & I are about the only people familiar enough with the intricacies of the work. Currently I am switching tables from our original format over to the assessment format you wrote (including "importance"), you can see my start at Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WPArts. The WVWP work is slow right now because it involves three stages before we can even contact groups. However it's VERY fruitful once contacts are made, just last night two more projects (trains and novels) added themselves to the bot list, I can see us breaking the 100,000 article barrier by fall (for articles read by the bot). Think what we can do with that level of metadata, especially once the assessments get done! Here are the three pre-contact stages: Then, we're ready for contacting! The category changeover doesn't affect Science or Places, that's one hassle you can ignore. I had someone offer to help in contacting Science projects, it would be good to get someone new "trained" in this. If you could get those two sections updated and formatted, I'd be forever in your debt. Let me know if this is OK for you. Once again, MANY thanks, Walkerma 23:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Write the appropriate section for the master list, showing status of old contacts and to include all of the new projects. (If you'd prefer, I can do this step for you).  With so many projects now to keep track of, I am finding this new WVWP master list to be very useful for seeing the big picture. To look for new projects you can use your download of Interiot's list, but also I have found the official list to be much more up-to-date than it used to be.
 * 2) Using the master list to guide you, update the old page to include the new project listings.
 * 3) Switch over old tables to the new format.

Help required
Hi Tito,

I am looking for help and hopefully have reached the right person. I need help with the Indian Institutes of Technology article. The article has recently achieved FA status. Within weeks of getting the FA status, Tony brought the article to Featured article review over concerns of quality of writing and use of citations, specifically Criterion 2(a) and 2(d). In the past few weeks, I tried to improve the article myself so as to take care of all the objections, however few editors are still unconvinced. Tony suggested that I contact a member of Version 1.0 Editorial Team. After going through the list of members of the team, and your own userpage, I feel that you will be perfect person to help me. Thanks, &mdash; Ambuj Saxena (talk) 14:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * Thanks for the copyedits. I am in no hurry. I will look into your suggestions regarding citations and weasel words. &mdash; Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Update:I have provided references wherever asked for. I have also copyedit the section about reservation to eradicate as many weasel words as I could find. &mdash; Ambuj Saxena (talk) 09:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hope you have not forgotton the request. Voting has started on the article's FARC. &mdash; Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Comparison test series.svg
Hi Tito and thanks for the image. I have a suggestion though. I think it would be good if the fonts were say three-five times as big, and the lines thicker, say twice as thick. That way the picture will look better as a thumb I would think. Wonder what you think about that. You can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 06:40, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, it was just my first attempt at an SVG image, though. I'll try to make one later today that looks better. Tito xd (?!?) 15:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, how does it look now? Tito xd (?!?) 17:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, looks good now! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Static content, WP 0.5, et al
Hi Titoxd,

We're looking into various static content projects already underway over at the static content subcom, and would appreciate input. What would make your life easier in working on WP 1.0 and related projects? What sister projects have you encountered but not had time (or language skills) to coordinate with? &c. Please leave comments on the subcom's talk page.

All the best, +sj + 15:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I've replied there, but Martin most likely will comment about things I may have not covered. Tito xd (?!?) 16:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2
Number 2, July 2, 2006 The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.

Storm of the month

Tropical Storm Alberto was the first tropical storm of the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season. Forming on June 10 over the western Caribbean Sea, the system moved northwestward as a disorganized tropical depression due to dry air and wind shear. It passed to the west of Cuba, bringing heavy rainfall to Cuba and Grand Cayman. The rainfall damaged 37 homes and destroyed 3 in Havana. It strengthened over the Gulf of Mexico and became a tropical storm on June 11. The center reformed to the northeast near its deep convection, and Alberto reached a peak intensity of 70 mph (110 km/h) before weakening and hitting the Florida Panhandle on June 13. Alberto brought heavy rainfall to the southeastern United States, peaking at 7.16 inches in Raleigh, North Carolina. The rainfall in Florida was beneficial in places as it alleviated drought conditions. The storm indirectly caused two deaths: A pilot who crashed near Tampa due to poor conditions and a boy who drowned in the flooding in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Other tropical cyclone activity
 * Tropical Depression Two-E briefly existed near the Mexican coast on June 3 to June 4 and brought heavy rainfall to Acapulco.
 * Tropical Storm Jelawat lasted from June 26 to June 29 in the South China Sea and made landfall on China. The storm caused flooding which killed at least seven people.
 * Tropical Storm Ewiniar formed on June 30 east of Palau. It is forecast to reach typhoon strength.

New and improved articles
 * New storm articles include: Tropical Storm Alberto (2006), Typhoon Patsy (1970), Tropical Storm Larry (2003), Cyclone Steve and Hurricane Danielle (1998).
 * New non-storm articles include: Subtropical ridge and List of named tropical cyclones.
 * New Featured articles: Hurricane Nora (1997), List of New Jersey hurricanes, Hurricane John (1994) and Hurricane Katrina.
 * Articles which became A/GA class include: Tropical Storm Allison (A), Eye (cyclone) (GA), Tropical Cyclone (GA), Project Stormfury (GA), Hurricane Lenny (GA), Hurricane Epsilon (2005) (GA), Hurricane Esther (1961) (GA), Tropical Storm Henri (2003) (GA) and Hurricane Camille (GA).

New articles and improvements wanted
 * New article: List of California tropical storms and List of New Jersey hurricanes are both featured lists, so why is there no List of Louisiana hurricanes or List of Cuban hurricanes?
 * The current collaboration of the fortnight is Hurricane Fifi, please help improve this article.
 * Please help to expand and improve the coverage of Tropical cyclones on Wikinews.
 * Improvements are requested to Hurricane Janet, Hurricane Erin (1995) and Pacific hurricane season articles.

Member of the month The June member of the month is Jdorje. The WikiProject awards this to him for his many contributions to the coverage of tropical cyclones on Wikipedia. Jdorje founded the WikiProject in October 2005 and established much of the categorizations the project depends on. His most significant contributions include the Featured article 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane and his track map generator with which he has created hundreds of track maps.

Main Page content
 * Hurricane Floyd appeared on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 17.
 * Entries from 5 articles: Tropical Storm Larry (2003), Tropical Storm Henri (2003), Typhoon Kate (1970), Typhoon Patsy (1970) and List of named tropical cyclones appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during June.

Storm article statistics

WikiProject subpages

This is a brief description of some of the subpages of the WikiProject, explaining their purpose briefly, to find out more read the pages.
 * Assessments: Provides a series of guidelines to help with the assessment and improvement of articles. Discussion of how to improve specific articles is also held here and future nominations for FAC.
 * Merging: Discussion of articles which could be merged is held here. Generally for less significant topics, their articles are likely to be listed here unless very well written.
 * Article requests: A list of many possible subjects for articles, with comments on the worth of an article. If you have a topic which you think should have an article, list it here.
 * Collaboration: Discussion of the collaboration of the fortnight is held here. Nominate an article for WikiProject collaboration or comment on the existing nominations on this page.
 * Newsletter: The content of future editions of this newsletter and selection of Member of the month are discussed here.
 * Other topics not relating to a specific article are handled on the main WikiProject talk page.

Thanks to Hurricanehink to maintaining the stats table and producing the storm summaries. Nilfanion (talk)

Personal
DA se esta metiendo personalmente conmigo:

Tenga razon o no, es obvio que en estos primeros dos ejemplos solo actua por molestarme en mala fe,,.

Aqui me isnsulta Minor changes with ofensive summary

Aqui modifica una pagina mia sabiendo que me va a molestar, vandalismo disfrazado: He know he is not welcomed yet he insisted

El tipo no deja pasar ni 20 minutos para cambiar lo que sea que hago, nunca. Tienes idea? no te exagero, no hay pagina que haga o edite sin que el deshaga de 30 min a 12 hrs. despues. Ya admitio monitorearme y hay evidencia de que lo haga en mala fe. Aqui la tienes, con esto ya puedes obligarlo a dejarme en paz.


 * "User:Dyslexic agnostic appears unable to assume good faith with regards User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow, and appears to have formed himself into a one man T-Man correction squad, note [51]. I'm also concerned by the comments expressed in this diff, [52], which indicate some level of keeping an eye on T-Man. User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow seems incapable of keeping his temper with regards Dyslexic agnostic".   -Steve Block ( Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence ).


 * Simply put; they show signs of being able to work usefully, but need to be kept apart. Mozzerati 20:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC) -Mozzerati Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence


 * He has come to believe that T-Man's contributions are without merit, and has not been shy in saying so. Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence

Previous cases:


 * WARNING READ THIS NEXT ONE CAREFULLY 5 TIMES: In the matter of Cool Cat (talk • contribs) (aka User:Coolcat) — a case decided on October 5, 2005 — the ArbCom voted that wikistalking was unacceptable in the following circumstances: It is not acceptable to stalk another editor who is editing in good faith. (Note that everyone is expected to assume good faith in the absence of definite evidence to the contrary.) Once an editor has given reason to suspect bad faith, monitoring is appropriate, but constantly nit-picking is always a violation of required courtesy. There are hundreds of administrators available to monitor problem users...Following an editor to another article to continue disruption (also known as wikistalking)'. The term "wiki-stalking" has been coined to describe following a contributor around the wiki, editing the same articles as the target, with the intent of causing annoyance or distress to another contributor.


 * In the matter of Skyring — a separate case decided August 12, 2005 — a user was found by the Arbitration Committee to have committed "wikistalking". The committee voted 5-0 that:

"The term 'wiki-stalking' has been coined to describe following a contributor around the wiki, editing the same articles as the target, with the intent of causing annoyance or distress to another contributor. This is distinct from following a contributor in order to clear repeated errors."

"On 13 June User:Skyring followed User:Jtdirl, editing a large set of articles that had recently been edited by Jtdirl (see contributions for 13 June). While it is not possible to fully assess intent, this action, and some of the edit summaries used, seem designed to provoke: 'enfeebled minds', 'Some professional standards, please!', 'A common pattern for this editor to produce poor English', 'Low quality of Irish editor'"

Some interesting pages:

Bullies mainly use a combination of intimidation and humiliation to torment others. The following are some examples of bullying techniques:
 * Cyber-bullying
 * Cyberstalking
 * Stalking
 * Bully


 * Getting a victim into trouble with someone (usually an authority figure), or incurring disciplinary action against the victim, for an indiscretion either not committed by the victim or for one that is exaggerated by the bully.
 * Using blatant sarcasm to appear as friendly (to an outsider) while asserting control and status over the victim. (This often occurs directly after the bully has deemed the person as a "worthy victim")
 * Calling the victim names; accusing the victim of uselessness in all of his or her pursuits.
 * Interfering with the personal property of a person, school books or materials, clothes, etc damaging same, or making fun of an individual through them in any way. (in this case vandalism on this page of keep posting against my will]]
 * Social isolation of the victim. See also clique.
 * Cyberbullying through the use of various information technologies.
 * Making the victim do what he or she does not want to do, using threats to ensure that the victim follows orders.
 * Demoting the victim without just cause.
 * Spreading negative rumours and gossip about the victim. In business, this may include false documentation. He achieves this by always supporting who ever might say something negative about me on talk pages.

Te equivocas:

In the matter of Cool Cat (talk • contribs) (aka User:Coolcat) — a case decided on October 5, 2005 — the ArbCom voted that wikistalking was unacceptable in the following circumstances:
 * It is not acceptable to stalk another editor who is editing in good faith. (Note that everyone is expected to assume good faith in the absence of definite evidence to the contrary.) *Once an editor has given reason to suspect bad faith, monitoring is appropriate, but constantly nit-picking is always a violation of required courtesy.
 * There are hundreds of administrators available to monitor problem users...Following an editor to another article to continue disruption (also known as wikistalking)'.
 * The term "wiki-stalking" has been coined to describe following a contributor around the wiki, editing the same articles as the target, with the intent of causing annoyance or distress to another contributor.

Alguna duda?

El comportamiento de DA no es permitido. DA llamo la atencion de Bennon y Shanel para el caso de arbitracion, no yo. Lo que estoy pidiendote es perfectamente legal. CovenantD y Grisworld no me conocian ni sabian de DA, dieron luz verde para el proyecto (logica: si existe todo un wikiproyecto acerca de como hacer articulos de episodios, categorias, categorias para shows animados y todos los ejemplos que he mencionado en la pagina de duialogo en cuestion estos articulos de episodios son perfectamente legales). Cuando DA los comenzo a revertir a lo wey, dio la impresion a los reservados editores de que estoy mal.

El caso coolcat claramente identifica a DA, quien, ya me ha vandalizado mas de cuatro veces, me insulto incluso recientemente, y quien ya ha admitido varias veces monitorearme, como alguien que merece ser bloqueado por in año.

Tu dime el tipo de pruebas que quieras y yo te las presento.

Mejoras en mi comportamiento desde la arbitracion:
 * Ya no insulto a DA
 * Ya no entablo discusiones con el.
 * Ya no lo ataco
 * No he tocado su pagina desde que el caso termino.
 * Sigo sin seguirlo a otras paginas.

Sin embargo el no ha cambiado el comportamiento que genero el proceso en lo mas minimo.

Nota como 3 de 4 veces que fui bloqueado fue por razones sin precedentes o buena justificacion. Ahora mismo podira revertir los q DA me ha revertido y causar que cuando el revierta por tercera vez, sea bloqueado.

Al no castigarlo lo alientas, 100% de los problemas que "te doy" tienen su razon y justificacion en DA. Su mala fe ya se ha puesto en evidencia.

--T-man, the wise 03:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

No, me ha vandalizado 6 veces, incluyendo una de hoy. Se mete con mis imagenes, todo lo que me edita encima es encontra de mi movimiento, sabe q me molesta que se meta en mi pagina y lo sigue haciendo. Continuar discuciones en otras paginas no esta permitido. me ha vandalizado 6 veces. No es buena fe, te cite varios otros usuarios admitiendolo. Me haces pensar que solo tienes miedo de confrontarte. No se porque t cierrastanto a algo tan evidente. Sabes lo que es editar lo que sea dondesea sabiendo que un desgraciiado lo va a deshacer en mala fe a lo wey? te puedo hacer lo mismo para que veas que se siente (hablo retoricamente)? Tienes idea de como me hace sentir no poder hacer nada sin que el lo deshaga? Por que te parece justo? el no es nadie oficial para monitorearme, si quieres monitoreame tu o alguen chingon, qunque no sepas de los temas, despues de todo el ya admitio que no solo me monitorea sino que no sabe de muchos de los temad que edito y ya lo ha admitido ampliamente(por ejemplo, el no ha visto ninguna de las series animadas). De nuevo, si quieres, como experimento t puedo hacer lo mismo, igualito, aparentando buena fe. Si dices que es perfectamente inocente, entonces probablemente tener tu propio parasito acosador de seguro no te molestaria.

Cool cat me dijo que no es facil identificar a los acosadores, mucho menos con administradores que prefieren hacerse a los ciegos que hacer justicia--T-man, the wise 04:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Titoxd, por lo menos deberias haber puesto un poco mas de atencion. Lleva diciendo esas mamadas de "let's be buds" desde que me conoce. Sabe que me encabrona y por eso lo hace. Si DA realmente quisiera paz me daria espacio.

Tambien si hubieses puesto atencion sabrias que originalmente yo no uqeria que sea castigado. Si, ya no lo aguanto, quiero su cabeza. Yo cambie mi comportamiento despues de la arbitracion, DA sigue jodiendo exactamente igual y recuerda el caso se abrio por el, no por mi. ¿Que es tan dicicil de entender? De verdad me haces pensar q le tienes miedo a tu trabajo. Lo sigues consintiendo y el problema se hace mayor. Prefieres bloquearme a mi por cualquier detallito al que nadie mas bloquean que encararlo.

¿Por que putamadre se mete con mis imagenes o sigue escribiendo en mi pagina si sabe que me recontra caga la madre? Analiza las evidencias haciendote la gran predunta por que?. Me ha vandalizado 6 veces. Aunque 5 sean en el pasado es demasiada prueba de su mala fe.

Ya te dije lee las paginas que te dije antes de responder, checa la evidencia, checa las citas de otros usuarios, responsabilizate, tu pediste encargarte. Si tengo derecho de no ser monitoreado por DA.--T-man, the wise 06:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Volvi a escribir porque note que minorizaste lo q DA hace, como puedo hacerte entender?

Paginas que yo edito sin que DA me siga y las cambie en 30min a 12hrs. aprox= 10%. Da en cambio puede hacer lo q se le de la gana y yo no lo sigo y ni me entero.

Cuando dices "solo por que DA deshizo unas ediciones tuyas de tal pagina" me queda claro que no te has dado cuenta de la magnitud del problema. Asi como esa, pasa lo mismo con TODO (literalmente todo!!! no es una exageracion figurada!!) lo que edito.

Lo siento, pero de nuevo, ponte en mis zapatos, si yo estoy seguro de que DA es una vandalo acosador. que edita en mala fe, y seguro de que por alguna misteriosa razon no te puedes dar cuenta(esto reconozco que puede ser mi culpa por no saberme explicar), que otra cosa puedo hacer sino insistir??

Pide que te presente la evidencia como quieras, yo te lo hago. Mas que nada te pido ayuda, como puedes decir que me vas a castigar por eso?

Si, es cierto, pero yo fui el que pedi los mentores!!! Y la idea era tenerlos en lugar de DA. Y no es irelevante, significa que aparte de las citas que te digo de Rowe y Steve Block y no c quien mas, DA incorrecta conducta llamo la atencion.

Tambien te confunde el porque fui castigado mas, porque hasta el ultimo dia de la arbitracion, mi comprension de que cosas cuentan como ataque eran muy limitados... tanto que mis argumentos de defensa en el fueron considerados un ataque. Eso distrajo mucho la atencion de los que tomaron decisiones. La cita del caso Cool Cat, estaba en el tope de la pagina y de algun modo todos se olvidaron. Como puedes juzgarme tanto si no te metes a fondo al caso?--T-man, the wise 06:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Vofoy afa efedifitarar mufuchafas pafagifinafas defe tefemafas quefe nofe mefe ifinteferefesafan, pafarafa quefe vefeafas cofomofo mefe sifiguefe. --T-man, the wise 07:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok, aqui tienes, observa como edite once veces en 20 horas y nueve me siguio... ya me siguio a la mayoria de mis contribs en menos de un dia. Ademas, en dos casos ya rompio la regla de no revertir mas de 3 veces. Ahi tienes, minimo para sacarlo una semana y prohibirle que me siga, pero por favor bloquealo de una vez por todas para siempre.


 * another reason to ban DA, here is him causing trouble instead of reconciling, something a “bud” would do


 * sin este articulo no tiene relacion con ninguno de los que haya editado últimamente, puse una falta adrede para que veas como me sigue,

lo mismo, que la anterior, todavía no hay cizaña, pero me molesta mucho que me siga


 * aquí ya rompio la regla de revertir 3 veces


 * destruccion de mi trabajo segunda vez que rompe la regla de revertir 3 veces

Observa como no edite nada sin que me siga el desgraciado, todo mi trabajo fue alterado o borrado, por un tipo que ya admitio que nisiquiera ve estas series.


 * #1

--T-man, the wise 02:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 

Counter-Vandalism Unit signature
"this is the wrong time to add something like this..." Could you please elaborate? When would be a right time? --  Netsnipe   C V U (Talk)  06:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Consensus and reversion
If my reversions of T-Man are justified how can I be banned for making them? The consensus is refer to is that of new pages for JLU episodes when the need to do so has not yet arisen... why wouldn't that extend to Batman animated episodes as well? Confused... -- Dyslexic agnostic 06:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I will try very hard to back away from him for a while. -- Dyslexic agnostic 06:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

''User:Dyslexic agnostic appears unable to assume good faith with regards User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow, and appears to have formed himself into a one man T-Man correction squad, note [51]. I'm also concerned by the comments expressed in this diff, [52], which indicate some level of keeping an eye on T-Man. User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow seems incapable of keeping his temper with regards Dyslexic agnostic''".   -Steve Block ( Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence ).


 * Simply put; they show signs of being able to work usefully, but need to be kept apart. Mozzerati 20:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC) -Mozzerati Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence


 * DA followed me here and got it all wrong when he copyedited. Why does he keeps editing articles he knows nothing about?

Bueno, que esta pasando? el tipo rompio 3RR 2 veces en un dia, me ofendio en los resumenes, me siguio a ahora a 13 de 14 paginas y todavia no lo ves??? como es eso posible 13 d 14+ 3RR(x2)!

Y no solo eso, sino que ademas me has bloqueado a mi por mucho menos!! Yo pedi los mentores para que me sigan en lugar de DA! Ahora tengo doble carga!!

Tambien simplifique y mejore las tablas de vandalismo al principio de mis mensajes. checala aver si asi te cae el 20 de su mala fe contra mi persona. Nota los tiempos que tarda en editar en cada caso despues de mi, y el numoro de editores en medio. No es logico pensar que eso es justo o normal.

Si no puedes o no quieres leer y checar las cosas (hey, todos tenemos cosas que hacer), pasa le mi caso a alguien que te lata. Robert Mclenon me ayudo bastante en el caso de arbitracion y pidio ser mi mentor, pero c v muy ocupado tambien.--T-man, the wise 07:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

JLU eps
En este parrafo mucho antes de que me bloquees injustificadamente, cedi y deje de tratar de crear los articulos

"Ok, this page some how, is different from all the other sharing the same format. I actually created the separeted articles because previous editors refused to expand it here, because they were also ignoring the list of lists of pisodes above. The guy that redirected the articles is a vandal who has chased, vandalized my page (erasing it all, moving it to T-man the stupid, etc.) and insulted me and you changed your mind because of his edits. Fine whatever, we will follow the now two-men-and-a-stalker-concensus. After all the unavoidable pages per episode will be sooner or later re-opened. And you will have contributed to nothing useful. What have you done anyways?--T-man, the wise 06:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)"

Decirle silly a alguien no es buen motivo. Si te dicen "tontito" no significa mucho. Ademas, checaste lo que Chrisworld hizo para recibir ese comentario?... no lo creo ,, y lo iba a hacer en todas las paginas donde estaba reclutando. El mismo pregunto si seria acoso y yo le puse el caso de referencia que te da la pauta de la definicion. Y si, no solo es desagradable lo que hizo sino totalmente inecesario (desde el punto d vista a su favor)--T-man, the wise 07:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

No, no te estas fijando bien, yo ya habia aceptado no volver a hacer las pags por episodio (que hay cientos en todo wikipedia), mucho antes de que intervengas.

Ok, deja es pagina en paz. Fijate en las que te puse. 13 de 14 lugares diferentes a los que fui? tambien te esta desobedeciendo y rompio 3rr 2 veces en una pagina aceptada, y en otra que no tiene nada que ver. Eso ya ni es cuestion de interpretacion, me has bloqueado por menos como si fuese chiste, 3rr es una regla de wikipedia. Por favor reconsidera, no creo que te gustaria que alguien te haga lo q da me hace.--T-man, the wise 20:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I Have no warnings on my talk page except for dumb comments i am trying to clean up
read the content of my page... I have a few people harrassing me. ER MD 08:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Ha ha...
Is it just me, or is this kind of funny? I'm going against policy by editing and changing talk pages without registering, eh? Boy, I've sure gotten away with it for a long time... ''' 69.145.123.171 Hello! ''' Monday, July 3, 2006, 08:27 (UTC)


 * Wish I could. --69.145.123.171 08:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

TC Disambigs and Categories
After a lot of research I finally managed to collate the List of named tropical cyclones (could you do the appropriate history merge?) and I'm now starting to go through the disambiguation pages. That's going to be heavy going so I don't want to do it more than once ideally. There's a couple things I'm not sure on though. First is the note on Category:Tropical cyclone disambiguation says "hurricane disambig is deprecated and should not be used". Should I change the disambigs to follow the suggested layout as I work through them? The second is a categorization question; with that research we have for the first time a decent listing of Southern Hemisphere TCs. This makes me think we should make many subcats to Category:Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons for example Category:1979-80 Australian tropical cyclone season (or South Pacific or Southwest Indian). Certainly if the disambig pages are added to Category:Pre-1980 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons (which is consistent with Tropical Storm Katrina (disambiguation) being in Category:1999 Atlantic hurricane season) that category would be overloaded by the time I'm done. It would also enable a reorganization of the SH pages (as was suggested on 2005-06 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season) at some future date. Should I be bold and start doing that recategorization as I go?--Nilfanion (talk) 15:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

69.145.123.171
I noticed you are supporting 69.145.123.171 not registering. A couple of users and I have found some ways to get by the limited abilities of anons (such as not having a watchlist). Well, we also found a way to get him a monobook, but we need an admin to create the page User:69.145.123.171/monobook.css&js. So could you (with 69.145.123.171's permission) create the pages? Thanks, GeorgeMoney (talk) (Help Me Improve!) 17:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Here is what happened with JUL eps

 * aquí puedes ver como los editores me dieron “permiso”, pero DA comenzo a hacer esto, sin dejarme terminar mi trabajo. Aquí puedes ver como yo comence a editar el 27 y DA comenzo a joder el 30.


 * Aquí hay un editor que ignora las posibilidades de WP:Stub, pero tiene mas sentido comun. Lo que si ig nora es que yo fui quien expandio los episodios que menciona como ejemplares para tener articulo propio: :T-man: just FULLY expand ALL the episode blocks on THIS page. Not spawn pages. Not secondary ones. Destroyer, Epilogue, Starcrossed: that's built up. Those I can see meriting their own page.

...Y despues de eso fue que me bloqueaste... un poco tarde, no?--T-man, the wise 20:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Can you please assist?
I'm sure you remember this guy's talk page from yesterday. After he was given all those warnings and blocked by you, he removed them all again. I said he should archive them if he doesn't want to see them anymore. So Irishguy added back the warnings. ER then responded to me by saying everything on his page is junk. I told him it would be put back regardless. He claimed that he is allowed to delete comments and that his block was for deleting things in unimportanat articles. He proceeded to respond to the question about his email before removing a warning again. So he removed the question he responded to and removed another warning. I told him once more that he shouldn't remove warnings. So he went into a rant about how he can delete whatever he wants, then said he could delete the warning he gave me about the 3RR and editing without registering. So what did he do? remove all the warnings on his page. He went on to fix up his rant and say he isn't vandalising. Irishguy restored it again, and ER promptly took them out again. Kungfuadam, aparently in RC, restored them. ER wrote himself a talk page policy while removing things again. I was upset he would consider my a vandal and thought because I removed his warnings he could remove all the others. So I ranted about it and have not yet recieved a response. I'm at a loss here. Since you were involved (and just so happen to be an admin) could you please help out? Thank you. ''' 69.145.123.171 Hello! ''' Monday, July 3, 2006, 22:38 (UTC)

By the way, sorry this is so long and confusing. That's just the way it happened. ''' 69.145.123.171 Hello! ''' Monday, July 3, 2006, 22:38 (UTC)


 * What was the initial infraction??? That is the only question that I have. I received two blocks for just trying to clean up the page--WHICH HAD NO WARNINGS ON IT until people started reverting my talk page.  I am not interested in having an archive. As an admin, you can see how many times I have been blocked. According to policy, stuff can be deleted from the talk page.  This is ER_MD responding from my work computer which is all of Kaiser Permante (if you want to block--it will block the entire network).  I am amazed at how much interest 69.145.123.171 has in my talk page.  Miffed?  What is the objective?  Why does he care so much and devote so much time?  Is this a form of stalking? 162.119.232.101 00:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Check your talk page. I made a list of all the warnings you've recieved, and as I recall they numbered five or six. Actually, it's ten... And yes, they were warrented. --69.145.123.171 01:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thank you


More harrasment
followed me and ranamed wikis knowing that's know how those are supposed to be named (Rowe and Khaoswors told him so long ago) Eso ni siquerea es "reparar" mis errores, solo te esta desobedeciendo y jodiendome. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by T-man, the Wise Scarecrow (talk • contribs) 04:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC).

T-Man Ban
I DEMAND his immediate ban. He just reverted my work in List of Batman: The Animated Series episodes in its entirety, with complete disregard for naming conventions, and a complete disregard of my edits for consistency of "Part One" and "Part I" (he of course being all over the map on this). DOES HE GET TO OWN THIS PAGE? If so, then Wikipedia is a pathetic excuse for a resourse. I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS BOOR. He is a complete waste of everyone's time. Why do we put up with this??? And how long does he get to defame me with impunity on his talk page? I DEMAND that all mentions of my by him be deleted NOW!!!! -- Dyslexic agnostic 07:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

d nuevo anda de vandalo Sus quejas no tienen nada de razon, si queres te muestro el link a la comparacion de historial en la que usuarios mas expertos le enseñaron que asi no se nombran los episodios de nada.

Para variar, comence a trabajar una pag diferente de episodios, sin repetir mi conducta anterior, y me siguio, desobedeciendote por completo.

Ahora si tienes suficiente para cortarle la cabeza.--T-man, the wise 07:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Look, I will stop reverting, and I retract my legal threats. PLEASE do something about the defamation against me. Dyslexic agnostic 07:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

oh, y ahi va de nuevo, esta ves otro usuario lo reparo... Suficiente o tambien tiene que decir explicitamente que es un acosador?--T-man, the wise 07:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Ah, aqui esta la evidencia de que DA ya sabia que su manera de nombrar los episodios esta mal --T-man, the wise 08:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * That is one person's opinion on how Dr. Who episodes should be named. This is not a wikipedia policy. Go to List of Prison Break episodes for an excellent example. -- Dyslexic agnostic 08:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Ese no era una opinion, sino un concenso. Como sea, cuando regreses, DA me siguio a otra pagina de episodios distinta, cuando vi que se iba a volver guerra decidi parar y buscar consenso desde el wikiproyecto, pero ahi tienes como me sigue para picarme y crear problemas. Tambien vandalizo 2 veces mi pagina. Me insulto, etc, etc. Links arriba. Ya cortale la cabeza, no?--T-man, the wise 08:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)