User talk:Titoxd/Archive24

Thank you!
Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your kind message! I'll try to continue not to screw up too badly. ;-) Cheers, Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 03:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: congrats
Muchas gracias :-))
 * Frieda 11:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: database & renames
Interesting! Thanks for the explanation. So you're saying that, if a user made an edit, it was deleted, and the user was renamed, that deleted edit would still be assigned to the user's original name? Wouldn't that make a big problem if some old revisions were ever restored post-rename of a user involved? Andre (talk) 01:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Andre, The bug you are referring to has been fixed. If you have been confused by something in particular, it was probably intentional. If either of you or anybody else has other questions, or don't understand what I'm talking about, please contact me via e-mail or IRC. Thanks. —freak(talk) 15:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Question: how to make IP address link
Titoxd, thanks for reverting edits of an anonymous ip address. I see the ip address you type in the edit summary are link. How do I do that? Double square brackets don't do it, singles don't, so, what? Reply on my talk page, i'll find it there. Nastajus 16:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Cardinal-nephew
I've sent up the Titoxd signal requesting your help! If you could spare a bit of time, I'd love your opinion as I'm not quite as seasoned at the FAC process as you are and a third opinion would be fantastic. Thanks either way!  JHMM13 (Disc) 22:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Will do. I have a final exam tomorrow so I can't work on it today, but I'll have a look at it. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 02:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * W00tage. Done. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 02:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to review this article. Your comments were helpful and I acted on most of them. If the situation is a little more complicated, I have replied on that page. Savidan 16:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:PS again
Please check out this MFD. Your opinion is welcome and requested since you particiated in the original MFD. /Blaxthos 22:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Usurpation and deleted edits
Any thoughts on this usurpation request? With deleted edits now apparently moved when accounts are renamed is there any good reason why Andre shouldn't perform the usurpation? WjBscribe 02:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Status templates
Hi

Thanks for making those status templates. I'm using the ones with the traffic lights.

I'm not linking to your userspace though, I copied the content so I could personalize them.

I figured you'd like to know they're being put to good use!... --Parzival418 Hello 06:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Admin coaching request
Hi, I'm GorillaWarfare and am hoping to receive some coaching to become an admin. If you'd like to coach me, please leave a message on my talk page. You can see my edit count here but don't be surprised when you see that I have 25 edits. That is because I recently forgot the password to my old account, User:Theunicyclegirl. Here is my edit count from my old account. I almost have 2000 edits. I frequently revert vandalism by watching Lupin's filtered RCs. I also like to expand stubs, particularly those relating to cats or dogs. I am very good with user warning templates and speedy deletion templates. I sometimes respond on AFD. Thanks for considering me! -- GorillaWarfare  talk 16:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism
AAARRRGGGHHH!!!! Why's Twinkle playing up this morning?
 * Titoxd said:
 * You may want to check the script you're using... Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 02:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

--Voxpuppet 02:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

m:Help:Installation
You moved it to MediaWiki.org, but m:Help:Installation/Users still there. Please, move it too. (I am sorry for my bad English). ru:User:Yakiv Gluck, 15 August 2007.

The mess in the article on the Finnish Orthodox Church
Yes, it looks much better! Thanks! --Tellervo 17:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't mind!
Have at it. My claims to be technologically clueless are quite accurate. :) --Moonriddengirl 21:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Question
Do you edit to the Spanish wikipedia with this account? I have always wondered if that is possible. Thanks! Brusegadi 19:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the link!Brusegadi 20:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Big font debug screenshot.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Big font debug screenshot.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sebvdv 06:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Reversion of edits by LifeStyleAuto on 21st August 07
Hi Titoxd, I just wanted to let you know that I also had to revert a couple of 'messiah' edits to the Aceh article which were in a paragraph about the Tsunami of 2004. I had a look at a couple of other articles about natural disasters and couldn't see that this editor had made any other similar edits, but I wanted to let you know in case you came across more and we needed to get the editor blocked or something. Cheers, --Sepa 21:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Akai's page article almost all gone by user GlassFET
User:GlassFET feels that the Akai article is not well referenced and therefore, almost everything must go. It all started when he deleted a reference to a manual that gives reference to an Akai machine listed there and he converted it into a "footnote". As a contributor, I didn't object. I asked him why though, he said, because the manual is copyrighted, so I didn't object to that answer but felt a "footnote" was probably not needed. Then he erased the word "broke ground" and re-arranged the paragraph (See: and his edits ) from the unit's paragraph because there was no reference that can verify that it did "break ground" as a porta studio of its time (1985). So, I found one ref, he dismissed as "not notable" because the link was to a studio page. Then, he told me that I wrote the paragraph on that unit wrong. Which is untrue. I wrote it factual and with the right machine specs. He decided at that point that rather than look for better sources for references, the article should be drastically trim down for lack of references. I think this user wants to meet Wikipedia standards, but also wants to incite me into to losing my civility and to disrupt the normal development of the Akai article. Can you help by making any comments? Thanks. 19:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Banned
How do I get unbanned? Grandthefthippo 22 August 2007 —The preceding  signed but undated.

The Greatest Hurricane Seasons of All Time
Hink and I thought this would be kind of fun. We're going around to some of our resident hurricane enthusiasts and asking them the same question: Worldwide, which season of what basin do you think earns the title 'The Greatest Season of All Time'. List your top five picks with a reason for at least your number one pick. It's not a big deal, but I thought it would be fun and interesting to hear what some of those really into it think. (By the way, nice picture on your userpage. I was just at Bryce Canyon over the summer. It really is an amazing place.) -- § Hurricane E  RIC  archive 22:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

CVU-TF Template
Hi Tito, and thanks for all the work you've done for the Task Force. Since StatusBot doesn't create each user's status page until the next round of updates, new Task Force members are often displayed with an error message, which breaks the table. Would it be possible to modify the code so that it adds the box, but shades it in a different color to indicate that no status information is available? Cheers! --Ratiocinate (t &bull; c) 15:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've taken the liberty to edit your code. Basically, I've changed it from:

if StatusBot Status page exists begin table switch Status page case 'online': background green case 'offline': background grey default: background yellow rest of table else Error: Status page does not exist

to: begin table if StatusBot Status page exists switch Status page case 'online': background green case 'offline': background grey default: background yellow else background red rest of table


 * Of course, feel free to change it if you so desire, or revert my changes if you dislike them. Cheers! --Ratiocinate (t &bull; c) 02:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Chacor / Erin talk page
I'm beginning to wonder if action within Wikipedia needs to be taken. Here is a portion of the Erin talk page which Chacor has been insisting on removing. How does this violate any wikipedia rules? He's claiming vandalism, trolling, and personal attacks. After reading the wikipedia related pages on those topics, any of those three looks like a significant stretch to me. If anything, I think Chacor may be guilty of flame war and personal attacks.

No Longer a TD
The HPC has stated that Erin is no longer a depression. For attempting to change the status, I got a nasty comment accusing me of vandalism from Chacor. Is this how the community is supposed to work or am I not "allowed" to make late-breaking changes to topics?
 * You called it a "landcane". That is clearly vandalism. – Chacor 03:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This is not vandalism. It is an unofficial weather term that you are not familiar with. Google landcane or landphoon. 66.114.93.6 23:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I am very familiar with the term, tyvm. The NWS did not refer to it as such. It is vandalism. – Chacor 10:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * So you are mirroring the NWS, despite there are multiple references on the web to the word landcane. However, with what's up on the article now; that describes it very well without using the forbidden word. I'm fine with that. But calling it vandalism is a bad decision on your part. You unnecessarly villainized the poor user. 66.114.93.6 07:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Thegreatdr 14:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Tito, you should know that the IP was vandalising - you yourself warned it for vandalism. The IP trolled on the talk page, accused me of vandalism when I was properly reverting its own vandalism and warned him for it, and DR sides with the troll, also has made an attack against me. "If anything, I think Chacor may be guilty of flame war and personal attacks." How is this justified at all? – Chacor 14:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow. If the comment on infoboxes is a personal attack, we're all sunk.  =)  Thegreatdr 14:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I was unaware of the Dean attack. I'd been taking some time off until Erin, and thought its history was more interesting than Dean (just a personal view as I don't root on major hurricanes for obvious reasons).  Anyhow, if the guy has a history of it, I could see how it could be interpreted as vandalism by those aware of the previous instances.  However, I was unaware of the Dean instance and was just judging this one edit on its own merit, assuming good faith.  Shouldn't good faith work both ways?  Do perceived personal attacks deserve retribution on wikipedia?  I don't think they do.  I was very careful above in being non-commital about whether Chacor was guilty or not.  I still don't know all the wikipedia nuances, even after 19 months.  Thegreatdr 15:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * "If anything, I think Chacor may be guilty of flame war and personal attacks." "I was very careful above in being non-commital" Really? – Chacor 15:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes. I'm sorry you don't see it that way.  I did not state that you were definitely guilty, I merely stated that you may be guilty.  I wanted clarificaiton.  Believe it or not, that still assumed some good faith.  Thegreatdr 15:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, WHAT? You said I "may be guilty of flame war and personal attacks." That is NOT assuming good faith. Even if any random person doesn't agree with me in this discussion, surely he or she would agree with me that this claim is ridiculous. You can't accuse someone of personal attacks and say you were assuming good faith... – Chacor 15:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I have been restrained in making such a comment, even during the Dora incident (if we're going to use the past to haunt users on wikipedia). Some of your actions since last winter are consistent with my comment.  None of us truly owns any of these pages.  Why act as if we do?  Thegreatdr 15:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't have to say a lot, I'll do it in two sentences: I haven't made any attacks, I've tried to remain civil while under attack, I made an appropriate removal of trolling which has been reverted. I've been attacked multiple times - here, on my talk page and here for it, with vague references to me violating Wikipedia policy when I haven't. I don't know what the aim is here, but if this user is trying to drive me off Wikipedia he's pretty darn close. – Chacor 15:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * As have I. I should have chatted with Chacor for a while longer before bringing it to a third party's attention, but the situation seemed to be escalating anyway.  Perhaps some cooling time was needed before bringing this to a third party.  I don't think that would have changed the fact that everyone interprets the Wikipedia pages on civil, own, vandalism, and personal attacks differently., which seems to be at the heart of this disagreement.  Thegreatdr 15:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You still claim you haven't made personal attacks when it's plain for all to see. I give up. You win. I'm out of here. – Chacor 15:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Guys, come on
And all of this has to occur on the day where I need to drive four hours on a trip? :S Everyone, please chill out. I really believe this is a hurricane in a teacup. I have to walk out the door Real Soon Now, but I'll say this: Doc, I'm not sure the flame war comment was warranted, as Chacor was acting on good faith. Chacor: I'm not sure the "He's trying to drive me off Wikipedia" comment is warranted either; unless you can read his mind, please shut up. On a more general statement, not tied to any particular incident, and pointed to everyone, not just you two: I realize that everyone has users that he or she doesn't like. But if you can't like each other, then try everything to at least get along, no?

One thing does need to be said: WikiProject guidelines are supposed to be flexible. There is absolutely no reason to remove good-faith questions from talk pages, or to try to accuse users for making questions or suggestions. There is no need to say to personalize issues and tell users that they "should know better", accusing of original research, name-calling, and all other behavior that gives the appearance of WP:OWN. I see these problems more and more these days, and they are usually justified using unwritten style guidelines, which is not actually convincing, and does make it a WikiProject-wide WP:OWN issue. In many ways, I think that we need to revisit several of our guidelines, and decide whether they really are helpful or not.

I'm sorry I can't really try to hash this out today, but I recommend everyone to go to a barbecue or something similar and just relax. Then come back and consider what is necessary to adjust the signal-to-noise ratio in these places nowadays. There is a ton of unnecessary tension right now. Why Can't We Be Friends? Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 23:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Tito, recommend moving this to project talk and discussing there as opposed to your talk. We are getting far too much instruction creep and to make it worse they are mostly unwritten so no-one really knows what the hell those project guidelines are any more! One comment aimed at all project editors WP:WPTC does not own 2007 Atlantic hurricane season or any other article, if we genuinely hold that perception it might be better to up-merge the project to meteorology and disband it.--Nilfanion (talk) 08:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Disbanding wouldn't actually fix anything, but I don't object to moving all this to WikiProject talk. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 00:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Darth Vader is your Father
The guy IP hops through the US. I think a one hour block will be more effective, as he's able to change it easily. --DarkFalls talk 03:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

As to the tag at WP:MFD you cleared, the MFD date 2007-09-08 needs to be closed out, as it is overdue. — xaosflux  Talk  23:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries. I put it there a day or so ago, one of the discussions got closed out, leaving just the one.  I may relist it to a newer day to clear it later.  Thanks, —  xaosflux  Talk  00:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Similarly good to see you!
Hey! Your note brought a grin to my face - glad to see you around! :D, and to be back in whatever fashion it ends up being! Has Wikipedia been treating you well? -- Nataly a 21:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Salsa dancing, yay! I picked out the fun thing from that list.  :)  Though I hope you find your various other studies fun, and that they are going well!  Things are going nicely on my side, it is nice to come back to Wikipedia feeling refreshed, and ready to do some editing, even if small. -- Nataly a  02:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It is frustrating when you want to do grand things for Wikipedia, and then life gets in the way. Such is life! :) Still, I'm sure your small contributions are most helpful. -- Nataly a  17:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Db-meta font size
I've commented on your recent edit to Template:Db-meta at Template talk:Db-meta. If you'd like to offer your perspective on the matter there, I'd be very grateful. Thanks in advance. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Your db-meta edit
While Wikipedia's tidy pass fixes the generated HTML so it's not a major issue, you put the  in the wrong place in this edit. To be completely correct, it should go one line earlier, just before the. Anomie 16:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, no
Several people told me to yes, please do that, because it might help. Other people said that it might actually not help, but nobody has pointed out any problems or harm from doing so. It can be beneficial and I don't see how it can be harmful.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  08:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wikimedia Fundraiser 2007.svg
Thank you for uploading Image:Wikimedia Fundraiser 2007.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 07:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh, I already deleted it. :P For anyone watching the talk page, I'm trying to create a banner for the upcoming fundraiser, and I'm debugging it here instead of doing it in Commons. It would be CopyrightByWikimedia, btw. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 07:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

WP1.0 template
Tito, I hope you're well. I've held off bugging you, because I could tell you were busy, but I was wondering if you could do some basic fixes to the WP1.0 template. The template generally works remarkably well, but there are just these few niggling details:
 * If you select v0.7=fail, it states, "This article is considered to fall outside the scope of the Version 0.7 test release," For example, if you look at Talk:Plastic, you failed it for low quality, not because it's outside the scope of the release (as part of WP:CORESUP, it's even within the scope for V0.5!).  It has a red traffic light, which corresponds on Release_Version_Nominations with a "fail on quality".  Meanwhile, if one types in v0.7=held it gives the same statement, but with the yellow traffic light.  Can you change the wording that results from v0.7=fail to say something like, "This article does not currently meet the quality requirements for an offline release.  Please improve the article and renominate." (Is that OK?)
 * If you select v0.7=nom, it says, "This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team". Well, actually it hasn't been!   See this example. Can you omit that section of the template, so it just reads "This article or list is a nominee for ...." ?
 * If you select WPCD=yes, it states that it is part of the 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection. But shouldn't this read 2007?  If you look, say, at Talk:Athens it says it was in the 2006 release, but if you check here you can see it wasn't!  This is probably because the same WPCD template was used for both the 2006 and the 2007 releases.
 * Should we have a nesting option (as there is with the other templates seen at Talk:Assyrian Church of the East)?  This would stop people being irritated by our template being full-size.  Or do you think our template should be kept separate from the project templates?  (I'm happy to see it nested, myself, but I don't have strong feeling on it).

Please let me know what you think. Thanks a lot! Walkerma 02:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I just saw this, it looks as if someone recently added the nesting feature! Walkerma 03:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Re:Quöoestëërëichenstaäd
Of course that's what my question was. It is a hoax. Look at the contribs. You seriously think one of a thousands speakers of some obscure language created an account and went straight to the Help desk to happen upon that question? It makes absolutely no sense. He's being silly, I'm simply pointing it out without being overly rude about it.  Lara Love  20:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You're right. I guess I just felt it necessary to point out the stupidity in his explanation. I've got stop feeding trolls.  Lara Love  02:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Use of third person
Where your User page says, "For those who are wondering why this page is written in 3rd person, I'm practicing my formal writing so I can become a more active member/editor of Wikipedia", wouldn't it be that much more effective to say, "For those who are wondering why this page is written in 3rd person, the author is practicing his formal writing so he can become a more active member/editor of Wikipedia."?

Thanks for your valuable addition to the Semantic Mediawiki discussion on Jimmy Wales' talk page. --Libertyvalley 14:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

User:EthanolRules
Earlier, you blocked this user for a month, however i would like to suggest that you extend that ban to indefinite, as contributions show that this user has several sockpuppets, many banned for similar reasons, often involving personal attacks and racist comments. For a list please see User:Jac16888/Sandbox. Thank you for your time.--Jac16888 02:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
For reverting vandalism to my user page. --John 04:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Ronald A. Carson
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ronald A. Carson. Since you deleted and/or restored this article at one point in time, you might want to participate in the deletion review if you have not already done so. -- Jreferee    t / c  23:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Block request
Can you please block User 203.87.199.182 (talk for this user) for frequent vandalism of the Imus, Cavite article? This user is already guilty of vandalizing/frequently reverting said article as well as involvement in vandalism of Cavite and Las Piñas articles in the past.

This user has to stop, so it's high time to bring in the rope. Thanks. Reyrefran 01:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

An old MFD
This is just a heads up that I have undone your deletion resulting from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia arranged by topic. The major delete argument was that the content can be found at http://nostalgia.wikipedia.org - in fact that site is a snapshot from 10 December 2001, and there were many edits since then. I have moved it to a subpage of Archive where historical Wikipedia pages belong. Graham 87 13:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Wdefcon/Vandalism Info
The WP:VINFO hasn't been updated in 24+ hours, which is why I change it to level 0. My edit summaries were chopped of in attempting to preview the change, so can you update the Wdefcon/Vandalism Information please?-- Pre ston  H  02:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

You're right
WP:CSD notice should of course go on the page I'm talking about, not the talk page I'm lamenting over. Sorry don't have time to sign my post. SineBot come to the rescue! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.236.33 (talk) 07:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Little help?
Hey man, I've been trying to work a customised edit counter that counts the number of pages I've created and was wondering if you knew how to help? I have found a script that interion created, but he's been awol for a while. I brought it up here, but nobody's responded yet. I also brought it up at the village pump, but the same outcome. The script is here. Would you mind looking at it to see how to run the script and (worst case scenario) tell me how many pages I've created? I'm really curious to know. Thanks mate! -- linca linca  12:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Not working..
Hello, I'm trying to use your tool, but it gives this error. Would you please have a look? Much appreciated! Phgao 08:51, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Crash trace: StatBundle.parseOverwriteFromSource(StatBundle.java:222) StatBundle.parseFromConnection(StatBundle.java:159) StatBundle. (StatBundle.java:81) Stats.mainDownload(Stats.java:116) QueryFrame$process.run(QueryFrame.java:848)

Can you fix this?
This pic isn't working. The old version is showing* over the new one uploaded on top. I tried using the purge function which didn't work. (*eta, in thumbnails where it is used) Good kitty 02:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Charley
Hey, if it's any consolation, it's been 353 days since I started working on the topic. If you finish Charley before September 28, 2008, you should be fine :P --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 05:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Marty
I think you would have been more useful at that time by giving me a good knock on the head... You might as well take the protection off as that edit war isn't going to flare up again. However your thoughts on the actual discussion would be appreciated (its at WP:WPDAB) ;)--Nilfanion (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Belarus assistance
Tito, could you take a look at this comment on my talk page and perhaps leave a reply. Isn't there a bot admins have available that can generate such categories - or does it not do this? Thanks, Walkerma 02:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! Walkerma 23:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

A-Class reviews
Care to comment on this? Walkerma 23:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Una ayuda?
Tito, I was asked to look at this, but I need another opinion in Spanish. My summary is at the bottom. It's a question of whether a person self-identifies as gay, or whether the magazine is quoting other (dubious) sources -- it's hard for me to tell. If you have a moment, can you take a look? Sandy Georgia (Talk) 01:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, resolved, Jossi got to it. Saludos, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 03:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

LOTD proposal
You either voted on the original list of the day proposal or the revised version. A more modest experimental proposal is now at issue at WP:LOTDP. Feel free to voice your opinion.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed you voted on the List of the Day proposal. A new one has been made and your comments are welcome. The Placebo Effect 02:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

small infobox template
Are you the one who does a lot of template tinkering? Can you modify the small infobox template to accommodate the depressions found in this article ? I've always hated the way this was set up because I think they should each get their own box. Good kitty 03:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Yet another discussion....!
Thanks for adding your views on A-Class last week. This week is a proposal here to reorganise a few of the subsections of the Release Versions page and the GA page (both use the same top level categories). I personally think most are very good suggestions, and it might be best to do all these changes at once and in synch with GA. Thanks, Walkerma 02:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)