User talk:Titus Atomicus

Edward Fenton (disambiguation)
Hello, could you please stop edit warring on this page to add an invalid entry? As I put in my initial edit summary: 'removed entry with no links, see WP:DDD.' disambiguation pages are eseentially indexes of Wikipedia articles. If you think the book meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG, you could create an article on it, directly yourself, or with support through articles for creation. Then it would be a useful entry on the page. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Hello, I do not have really time (at the moment) to create a new entry. However it is sad the popular author does not have the entry in wiki. Does that mean he does not exist? Why? Because Amazon does not have his books in the offer? Instead of letting others to complete this entry you are acting as a bot just trashing it. What you are doing is ridiculous and detrimental. Titus Atomicus (talk) 20:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

WP:NOTAFORUM
Article talk pages are not a place for you to discuss the subject of the article, they are for discussions about how the article can be improved. You comment was removed as a violation of WP:NOTAFORUM, restoring it was a violation of WP:BRD, and is the first step towards WP:Edit warring, which is not allowed. Please do not restore it again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC) That was my comment about improving the article. Do not be a vandal. Wikipedia is not your private enterprise. Titus Atomicus (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Bir Tawil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 19:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In my opinion Beyond My Ken started this war. Not the first time. It seems he constantly removes versions which are different from his opinions. I would like to point out we were on the article's talk page not on the article page itself. Titus Atomicus (talk) 19:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

So where is there an appropriate page to discuss article's talk pages and how to stop some of the editors' madness? Titus Atomicus (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

auto-suspending
After years of contributing to wikipedia I came across a character who turned out to be an arogant moron and a vandal. Beyond My Ken whom I met in Halayb Triangle and Bir Tawil articles behaves in an inappropriate way. He thinks probably he is an owner of wikipedia. Anyway I do not have time and I am not in a mood to play his games. It is like flogging a dead horse. I am fed up.

Hereby I am suspending all my edition works.

Titus Atomicus (talk) 22:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)