User talk:Tiziana DF

April 2021
Your recent editing history at John Barrowman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sungodtemple a tcg fan!|!!1!1|11!|!! (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

I don't want an edit war but it's not right that the other person keeps writing false accuses and without any proof. I've seen there's been another person before me that deleted the same content but apparently someone doesn't care. Those accuses can cause an unfair harm if not true and don't think Wikipedia is the right place to write that kind of things Tiziana DF (talk) 14:50, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry but I've just seen that content I removed has been added again. Another person deleted it after me and it's been added again and then the editing button has been locked. What I got told should be valid for the other user too. Why in my case it was what I think it should be and for the other user is what it is? There's other people who think I'm right and it's not only me. I'd like at least an explanation. Tiziana DF (talk) 19:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)