User talk:Tja5280

June 2013
Hello, I'm Mathnerd 101. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Joan Blondell, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. - Math  nerd   101   15:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

On inappropriate external links and linkfarming
I reverted your addition to Maya Deren as it did not seem to add significant information: see WP:ELNO #1. I see you have also been adding external links to various other articles; please also read WP:LINKFARM. AllyD (talk) 16:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Bbb23 (talk) 00:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

External links to JWA.org
At, I defended addition of these links as being appropriate and useful for the articles to which they were added. I also asked for other opinions at  (to which there's been no reply). It would be helpful if you would acknowledge seeing the messages posted here and defend the addition of these links, as I believe they improve Wikipedia, and editors will likely stop reverting them immediately (as they should) and discuss their concerns here instead if you will engage in the conversation. —&#91;  Alan M 1  (talk) &#93;— 22:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Agree with AlanM1
The external links Tja5280 added are appropriate and useful additions to their articles. How they can be described as spam, I have no idea. I have taken the liberty of reversing several dozen of them as the reasons given for their removal are not valid. The articles at JWA are written by experts and have bibliographies (that means a list of sources used to write the article). The reversion by AllyD is almost valid, but not quite: the reason given was that the EL adds nothing significant;  but, the bibliography to the EL article lists three sources not in the wiki article, books by Sadoul and Vogel and the NYT obit. Tja5280 stopped editing on June 18, and she(?) was only on the letter "G". Is it hard to understand why she might have quit? --108.45.72.196 (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yup. That is unfortunate. I do recall emailing them at the time to try to repair any harm done. Not sure if I got an answer. On my to-do list is the creation of an external link template for that site (like we have for other often-used ELs) and going through their bios and adding links to them from WP. Pretty far down my list, unfortunately. —&#91;  Alan M 1  (talk) &#93;— 05:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)