User talk:Tjliles2007

Image tagging for Image:10px-Redshirt.png
Thanks for uploading Image:10px-Redshirt.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 04:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:10px-Redshirt.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:10px-Redshirt.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:800px-Dpp.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:800px-Dpp.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

nice work!
nice work on the colorization in List of 2008 United States Democratic Party Superdelegates! Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 21:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Image preview problem
I've no idea why that happens, but it has to do with the 800px thumbnail preview not updating after the image has been changed. Sometimes when I update it it changes straight away, sometimes it takes a few refreshes, and sometimes it just seems to get stuck! In the latter case I go into the wikipage that it's used on and change the width by 5px, that seems to fix it... I don't think it has anything to do with the image size - that's probably because I'm using GIMP to edit and other people are using something else. Umeeksk (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Statewide opinion polling for the Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO  Hail!  19:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Alpha Superdelegates, nice addition but maybe too much?
First, Tjliles, kudos on your hard work with this page. Super work! I've been plinking away trying to get it more or less up-to-date. Right now, the Obama delegates are pretty solid and there are probably 25-30 Clintons still to be accounted for. Also, I ran through and re-worked the edits that were over-written by your recent update. FYI.

Anyhoo -- I think your recent addition of the alpha list may be too much for this page. I LIKE the alpha list. I also like the by-group list. But having dualing formats on the same page seems too much. I'd almost rather go with all one or the other -- either all alpha or all by category. I see maintaining clean parallel lists to be a problem. IMHO.

Again, great getting this page up and running. Regards! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scantron2 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Tjliles -- a question...
So - your plan is to roll over into the alpha list and ditch the other once the conversion is complete? That sounds good.

A question: will you want the names to be in "last, first" format so they'll sort properly? If so, I'd be happy to reformat those. Let me know.

Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scantron2 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

One last thing
Thanks for the reply.

FYI - the sorting doesn't work out so well for me. I'm using firefox, though I don't think that should matter. Anyway, when I click on the sort buttons, it sorts the delegates by first name, not last. And if I re-sort (by name, by group, then by endorsement, for example) it preserves the prior sort. The result of this is that once I leave alpha I never can get back. Not a big deal, but I thought I'd mention it.

I noticed that there are about a dozen more delegates in the group list versus alpha. I'll track those down and insert them (using the current formatting this time!) and then clean up the colors.

Thanks again for all your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scantron2 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Status of the list
Hey Tjliles,

I did a count and here's what I show for numbers:

Alpha list - Clinton 200 Obama 170 Uncommitted 387 Total 757

Group list - Clinton 202 Obama 172 Uncommitted 379 Total 753

This is a rough count. So - there are a few loose ends to clean up -- transferring over at least 2 Obama and Clinton citations plus doing a rough match to make sure we didn't drop any uncommitted delegates.

I just copied the current page to a standalone HTML file. If you want to drop section 3 out, I can finish the reconciliation tonight and won't need that history. I guess I'd be in favor of that doing that cut sooner rather than later, even though I won't be able to get to this until late PM (MDT).

Your call. Cheers!

--Scantron2 (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to List of 2008 United States Democratic Party superdelegates has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 17:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Edit
edit you reverted was a bad one, but you shouldn't revert it now as I was removing the invalid poll as discussed in talk. Rodrigue (talk) 18:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Merger proposal
Please see Talk:United States presidential election in Massachusetts, 2008.—Markles 00:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:800px-Dpp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:800px-Dpp.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 02:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Superdelegates
I've seen your rv in the superdelegates page, and I agree with your edit. However, It might be a good idea to check on the names if there is an endorsement or two we could add to the list. I'll give it a try. --Bouchecl (talk) 04:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Monroe levy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Monroe levy.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gwatney.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gwatney.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 22:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Gwatney.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gwatney.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Gwatney.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gwatney.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 23:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't use Wikinews- I don't know what their copyright policies are or how strictly they are enforced. I am seeing no evidence at all that that image is under a free license- the website you've taken it from has a clear copyright notice stating that all rights are reserved. Why do you believe the image is free? J Milburn (talk) 23:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Not at all the way it works- consensus and practice vary massively between projects, not to mention the fact that even if it's their on Wikinews, doesn't mean it is allowed. However, that's irrelevant- here, evidence is required that images are under a free license. If you cannot provide the evidence, the image will be deleted. J Milburn (talk) 23:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 09:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)