User talk:Tjlphd

Sonodynamic therapy
I've reverted your edit here. There are several reasons, but two most important ones are: As such, I don't think it could be accepted as is as a Wikipedia article. However, it could be edited such that it becomes one. If you own the copyright, you can verify it. For instructions how to, see WP:DCP and WP:CONSENT. --vuo (talk) 21:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Even if I didn't find this article on Google, I still think it's copied verbatim. Telltale signs are no inline references, but numbered citations lacking formatting, no linefeeds in reference list, and middot symbols copied as is. The style is also suggestive of a promotional article. Copying verbatim is fine as long as the editor owns the copyright and wishes to re-license the text for Wikipedia.
 * 2) The article is about activated therapies in general. This is problematic, because it conflates the proven treatment, photodynamic therapy, and the unproven or outright unscientific treatments like "sonophotodynamic therapy". It starts very heavy with two paragraphs that are not actually about the subject of the article.

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --vuo (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)