User talk:Tkabal

February 2019
Hello, I'm Smartse. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The point being made where the edit was added, is widely mis cited. The article referenced clearly outlines the math utilized so people can have a reference for the counterpoint. Without it, the Wikipedia page is one-sided and not providing a good source of information on the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkabal (talk • contribs) 16:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clarifying. The most important thing for you to be aware of is that any information related to human health requires high quality sources. In this instance, Cannabidiol cites this review published last year that noted there were differences in doses comparing CBD with whole-plant extracts. Your link, refers to this piece of primary research which isn't (and shouldn't be) cited anywhere on Wikipedia. There isn't anything in either of our articles about doses, but that review says "Patients treated with CBD-rich extracts reported lower average dose (6.0 mg/kg/day) than those using purified CBD (25.3 mg/kg/day)." you can't use such a low quality source as yours to try and say that a peer-reviewed review article is wrong. SmartSE (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)